İsmail Güzel, İbrahim Ulusoy, Mehmet Yılmaz, Mehmet Fırat Tantekin, Aybars Kıvrak
{"title":"Early versus Delayed Plate Fixation in Pilon Fractures.","authors":"İsmail Güzel, İbrahim Ulusoy, Mehmet Yılmaz, Mehmet Fırat Tantekin, Aybars Kıvrak","doi":"10.7547/25-087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pilon fractures refer to distal tibial fractures that may involve extra-articular, partial articular, or complete intra-articular components, most commonly caused by high-energy trauma. The choice between early (<72 hours) and delayed (>7 days) surgical fixation significantly impacts clinical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the effects of early vs. delayed plate fixation on fracture healing time, functional outcomes, and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 80 patients who underwent surgical treatment for pilon fractures between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: Early surgery (<72 hours, n=40) Delayed surgery (>7 days, n=40) Additionally, patients were categorized based on the fixation method: Single plate fixation (n=40) Double plate fixation (n=40) Outcome Measures: Fracture healing time (weeks) - Defined as cortical continuity on radiographs Functional outcomes (AOFAS score) Complication rates (infection, malunion, implant failure) Results: Shorter healing time was observed in the early surgery group (14.2 vs. 16.8 weeks, p<0.05). Better functional outcomes were recorded in the early surgery group (AOFAS score: 82.3±6.5 vs. 78.1±7.2, p<0.05). Lower infection rates were noted in the delayed surgery group (7.5% vs. 12.5%, p<0.05). Double plate fixation provided better mechanical stability but resulted in higher soft tissue complication rates. Single plate fixation preserved soft tissue integrity but had higher malunion and implant failure rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early surgery is associated with shorter healing time and better functional outcomes, but increased soft tissue complications require careful management. Delayed surgery offers a safer approach for soft tissue healing but may prolong functional recovery. While double plate fixation ensures greater stability, it may increase soft tissue morbidity, whereas single plate fixation reduces soft tissue complications but may compromise stability. A personalized surgical approach is recommended for optimal outcomes in pilon fracture management.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/25-087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pilon fractures refer to distal tibial fractures that may involve extra-articular, partial articular, or complete intra-articular components, most commonly caused by high-energy trauma. The choice between early (<72 hours) and delayed (>7 days) surgical fixation significantly impacts clinical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the effects of early vs. delayed plate fixation on fracture healing time, functional outcomes, and complication rates.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 80 patients who underwent surgical treatment for pilon fractures between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: Early surgery (<72 hours, n=40) Delayed surgery (>7 days, n=40) Additionally, patients were categorized based on the fixation method: Single plate fixation (n=40) Double plate fixation (n=40) Outcome Measures: Fracture healing time (weeks) - Defined as cortical continuity on radiographs Functional outcomes (AOFAS score) Complication rates (infection, malunion, implant failure) Results: Shorter healing time was observed in the early surgery group (14.2 vs. 16.8 weeks, p<0.05). Better functional outcomes were recorded in the early surgery group (AOFAS score: 82.3±6.5 vs. 78.1±7.2, p<0.05). Lower infection rates were noted in the delayed surgery group (7.5% vs. 12.5%, p<0.05). Double plate fixation provided better mechanical stability but resulted in higher soft tissue complication rates. Single plate fixation preserved soft tissue integrity but had higher malunion and implant failure rates.
Conclusion: Early surgery is associated with shorter healing time and better functional outcomes, but increased soft tissue complications require careful management. Delayed surgery offers a safer approach for soft tissue healing but may prolong functional recovery. While double plate fixation ensures greater stability, it may increase soft tissue morbidity, whereas single plate fixation reduces soft tissue complications but may compromise stability. A personalized surgical approach is recommended for optimal outcomes in pilon fracture management.
背景:皮隆骨折是指胫骨远端骨折,可能涉及关节外、部分关节或全部关节内构件,最常见的是由高能创伤引起的。早期(7天)手术固定的选择显著影响临床结果。本研究旨在比较早期与延迟钢板固定对骨折愈合时间、功能结局和并发症发生率的影响。材料和方法:本回顾性研究分析了2018年至2023年接受手术治疗的80例皮隆骨折患者。患者被分为两组:早期手术(7天,n=40)另外,根据固定方法对患者进行分类:单钢板固定(n=40)双钢板固定(n=40)结果测量:骨折愈合时间(周)-定义为x线片上的皮质连续性功能结果(AOFAS评分)并发症发生率(感染,不愈合,植入物失败)结果:早期手术组的愈合时间较短(14.2 vs. 16.8周,p。早期手术与较短的愈合时间和较好的功能结果相关,但增加的软组织并发症需要仔细处理。延迟手术为软组织愈合提供了更安全的方法,但可能会延长功能恢复。虽然双钢板固定确保更大的稳定性,但可能增加软组织发病率,而单钢板固定减少软组织并发症,但可能损害稳定性。个体化的手术方法被推荐用于治疗枕部骨折的最佳结果。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.