The feasibility and effect of a peer-facilitated, remote handcycling sport program for aging adults with spinal cord injury or disease: a mixed methods case series.

IF 0.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lovisa Cheung, Robert Buren, Natasha L Benn, Charlene Alton, B Catharine Craven, Susan Marzolini, Kristin E Musselman
{"title":"The feasibility and effect of a peer-facilitated, remote handcycling sport program for aging adults with spinal cord injury or disease: a mixed methods case series.","authors":"Lovisa Cheung, Robert Buren, Natasha L Benn, Charlene Alton, B Catharine Craven, Susan Marzolini, Kristin E Musselman","doi":"10.1038/s41394-025-00721-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Concurrent mixed methods case series.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the feasibility and effect of a peer-facilitated, remote handcycling sport program on physical, psychological, and social health of individuals with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) aged ≥50 years.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Participants' homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Manual wheelchair users aged ≥50 years with chronic SCI/D were eligible. Participants completed remote, group-based handcycling at moderate-vigorous intensity twice weekly for 12 weeks, co-led by a physiotherapist and peer with SCI/D. Handcycling duration was progressively increased to 45 min. Outcome measures were completed at three timepoints (pre-, post-, 12 weeks post-training). True change was assessed using the two-standard deviation band method for the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale, Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES), Positive Affect and Well-Being Scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, and minimal detectable change for the 6 min Push Test (6MPT). Semi-structured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five participants enrolled; four completed the program and one was withdrawn following fractures unrelated to program. Overall, divergence was observed when comparing quantitative and qualitative findings. Interview data revealed participants perceived physical, psychological, and social health improvements, but there was minimal change in quantitative scores. A few instances of convergence were noted; e.g., immediately post-intervention, SP01 experienced improvement in 6MPT distance, which corroborated SP01's perceived physical health improvements. At 12-week follow-up, SP03 experienced reduction in ESES score, which aligned with SP03's reports of skin issues limiting sport.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote handcycling provided some health benefits for participants with SCI/D aged ≥50 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":22079,"journal":{"name":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","volume":"11 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-025-00721-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Concurrent mixed methods case series.

Objectives: To examine the feasibility and effect of a peer-facilitated, remote handcycling sport program on physical, psychological, and social health of individuals with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) aged ≥50 years.

Setting: Participants' homes.

Methods: Manual wheelchair users aged ≥50 years with chronic SCI/D were eligible. Participants completed remote, group-based handcycling at moderate-vigorous intensity twice weekly for 12 weeks, co-led by a physiotherapist and peer with SCI/D. Handcycling duration was progressively increased to 45 min. Outcome measures were completed at three timepoints (pre-, post-, 12 weeks post-training). True change was assessed using the two-standard deviation band method for the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale, Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES), Positive Affect and Well-Being Scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, and minimal detectable change for the 6 min Push Test (6MPT). Semi-structured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Five participants enrolled; four completed the program and one was withdrawn following fractures unrelated to program. Overall, divergence was observed when comparing quantitative and qualitative findings. Interview data revealed participants perceived physical, psychological, and social health improvements, but there was minimal change in quantitative scores. A few instances of convergence were noted; e.g., immediately post-intervention, SP01 experienced improvement in 6MPT distance, which corroborated SP01's perceived physical health improvements. At 12-week follow-up, SP03 experienced reduction in ESES score, which aligned with SP03's reports of skin issues limiting sport.

Conclusions: Remote handcycling provided some health benefits for participants with SCI/D aged ≥50 years.

同行促进的远程自行车运动项目对脊髓损伤或疾病的老年人的可行性和效果:混合方法病例系列。
研究设计:并发混合方法病例系列。目的:探讨同伴促进的远程自行车运动项目对年龄≥50岁的脊髓损伤或疾病(SCI/D)患者的生理、心理和社会健康的可行性和效果。场景:参与者的家。方法:年龄≥50岁的慢性SCI/D患者使用手动轮椅。参与者在一名物理治疗师和患有SCI/D的同伴的共同指导下,每周完成两次以小组为基础的中等强度的远程骑行,持续12周。骑车时间逐渐增加到45分钟。结果测量在三个时间点(训练前、训练后、训练后12周)完成。采用脊髓独立性量表、Moorong自我效能量表、运动自我效能量表(ESES)、积极影响与幸福感量表和感知社会支持多维量表的双标准差带法评估真实变化,并采用6分钟推压测试(6MPT)的最小可检测变化。采用主题分析对半结构化访谈进行分析。结果:5名受试者入组;其中4人完成了手术,1人因与手术无关的骨折而退出手术。总的来说,在比较定量和定性结果时观察到分歧。访谈数据显示,参与者感知到身体、心理和社会健康方面的改善,但定量得分的变化很小。注意到一些趋同的例子;例如,干预后,SP01在6MPT距离上立即得到改善,这证实了SP01感知到的身体健康改善。在12周的随访中,SP03的ESES评分下降,这与SP03报告的皮肤问题限制运动一致。结论:远程骑行对年龄≥50岁的SCI/D患者有一定的健康益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spinal Cord Series and Cases
Spinal Cord Series and Cases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
92
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信