Asparaginase Premedication With Hydrocortisone Decreases Hypersensitivity Reactions.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Ryan Guerrettaz, Megan Wegter, Melodee Liegl, Amy Y Pan, Kalen McCabe, Rebecca Volmy, Michael Burke
{"title":"Asparaginase Premedication With Hydrocortisone Decreases Hypersensitivity Reactions.","authors":"Ryan Guerrettaz, Megan Wegter, Melodee Liegl, Amy Y Pan, Kalen McCabe, Rebecca Volmy, Michael Burke","doi":"10.1097/MPH.0000000000003128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While pegylated Escherichia coli asparaginase (PEG) is an integral component of leukemia and lymphoma treatment, hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) remain a common adverse event, often resulting in adjustments to the treatment regimen, increasing the burden on patients and families. HSR to asparaginase often indicates a transition to Erwinia asparaginase (ERW), which requires patients to return to the hospital 6 times for subcutaneous injections to replace one dose of IV PEG. Previous trials have demonstrated rates of HSR to pegylated E. coli asparaginase (PEG) anywhere from 0.5% to 25%. At our institution, despite premedication with antihistamine medications such as diphenhydramine and famotidine, we have observed a similar range of patients develop treatment-limiting HSR to PEG. In addition, nonallergic infusion reactions (IR) often overlap symptomatically with HSR, making it difficult to identify true HSR, thus leading to the conservative clinical decision to remove asparaginase from the treatment plan. There are reports of adding hydrocortisone to the premedication regimen for patients receiving PEG, but this has been reported mainly in the rechallenge setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis evaluating the benefits of adding hydrocortisone to a universal 2-drug premedication regimen of famotidine and diphenhydramine. Data were gathered via chart audit comparing a group of patients with a 2-drug regimen (diphenhydramine and famotidine) to a group of patients with a 3-drug regimen of diphenhydramine, famotidine, and hydrocortisone. Analysis included patients with any lymphoid malignancy treated with a frontline PEG-containing treatment regimen. A 1-year time interval was used to collect data for the preintervention and postintervention groups. All patients who received IV PEG were reviewed. HSRs or infusion reactions were reviewed independently to confirm and grade using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), v5 of allergic reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 85 patients analyzed over a 2-year period, 50 were in group 1 and given a 2-drug regimen of diphenhydramine and famotidine before PEG infusion. The rate of HSR in group 1 was 38% with 12% experiencing IRs. Group 2 contained 35 patients who received a 3-drug regimen with diphenhydramine, famotidine, and hydrocortisone. The rate of HSR in group 2 was 11% with another 11% experiencing IRs. Based on this data, rates of IR remained unchanged, while rates of HSR decreased significantly by more than 25% (P=0.007) with the addition of hydrocortisone to the premedication regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our retrospective cohort study provided preliminary evidence that the addition of hydrocortisone to a 2-drug premedication regimen of diphenhydramine and famotidine can decrease the rates of hypersensitivity reactions to IV PEG.</p>","PeriodicalId":16693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000003128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While pegylated Escherichia coli asparaginase (PEG) is an integral component of leukemia and lymphoma treatment, hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) remain a common adverse event, often resulting in adjustments to the treatment regimen, increasing the burden on patients and families. HSR to asparaginase often indicates a transition to Erwinia asparaginase (ERW), which requires patients to return to the hospital 6 times for subcutaneous injections to replace one dose of IV PEG. Previous trials have demonstrated rates of HSR to pegylated E. coli asparaginase (PEG) anywhere from 0.5% to 25%. At our institution, despite premedication with antihistamine medications such as diphenhydramine and famotidine, we have observed a similar range of patients develop treatment-limiting HSR to PEG. In addition, nonallergic infusion reactions (IR) often overlap symptomatically with HSR, making it difficult to identify true HSR, thus leading to the conservative clinical decision to remove asparaginase from the treatment plan. There are reports of adding hydrocortisone to the premedication regimen for patients receiving PEG, but this has been reported mainly in the rechallenge setting.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis evaluating the benefits of adding hydrocortisone to a universal 2-drug premedication regimen of famotidine and diphenhydramine. Data were gathered via chart audit comparing a group of patients with a 2-drug regimen (diphenhydramine and famotidine) to a group of patients with a 3-drug regimen of diphenhydramine, famotidine, and hydrocortisone. Analysis included patients with any lymphoid malignancy treated with a frontline PEG-containing treatment regimen. A 1-year time interval was used to collect data for the preintervention and postintervention groups. All patients who received IV PEG were reviewed. HSRs or infusion reactions were reviewed independently to confirm and grade using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), v5 of allergic reactions.

Results: In 85 patients analyzed over a 2-year period, 50 were in group 1 and given a 2-drug regimen of diphenhydramine and famotidine before PEG infusion. The rate of HSR in group 1 was 38% with 12% experiencing IRs. Group 2 contained 35 patients who received a 3-drug regimen with diphenhydramine, famotidine, and hydrocortisone. The rate of HSR in group 2 was 11% with another 11% experiencing IRs. Based on this data, rates of IR remained unchanged, while rates of HSR decreased significantly by more than 25% (P=0.007) with the addition of hydrocortisone to the premedication regimen.

Conclusions: Our retrospective cohort study provided preliminary evidence that the addition of hydrocortisone to a 2-drug premedication regimen of diphenhydramine and famotidine can decrease the rates of hypersensitivity reactions to IV PEG.

天冬酰胺酶预处理氢化可的松减少过敏反应。
背景:虽然聚乙二醇化大肠杆菌天冬酰胺酶(PEG)是白血病和淋巴瘤治疗的重要组成部分,但过敏反应(HSR)仍然是一个常见的不良事件,经常导致治疗方案的调整,增加患者和家庭的负担。对天冬酰胺酶的HSR通常表明向Erwinia天冬酰胺酶(ERW)过渡,这需要患者返回医院6次进行皮下注射以替代1剂IV PEG。先前的试验表明,对聚乙二醇化的大肠杆菌天冬酰胺酶(PEG)的HSR率在0.5%至25%之间。在我们的机构,尽管预先使用抗组胺药物,如苯海拉明和法莫替丁,我们观察到类似范围的患者出现治疗限制性HSR到PEG。此外,非过敏性输液反应(IR)往往与HSR在症状上重叠,使得难以识别真正的HSR,从而导致保守的临床决定将天冬酰胺酶从治疗计划中去除。有报道将氢化可的松添加到接受PEG的患者的药物前治疗方案中,但这主要是在再挑战环境中报道的。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性分析,评估在法莫替丁和苯海拉明的通用2药前治疗方案中加入氢化可的松的益处。通过图表审计收集数据,比较两种药物治疗方案(苯海拉明和法莫替丁)和三种药物治疗方案(苯海拉明、法莫替丁和氢化可的松)的患者组。分析包括接受一线含peg治疗方案的任何淋巴细胞恶性肿瘤患者。采用1年的时间间隔收集干预前组和干预后组的数据。对所有接受静脉PEG治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。使用过敏反应通用术语标准(CTCAE, v5)对hsr或输液反应进行独立审查,以确认和分级。结果:85例患者中,50例为1组,在PEG输注前给予苯海拉明和法莫替丁两种药物方案。第1组HSR发生率为38%,其中12%发生ir。第二组35例患者接受苯海拉明、法莫替丁和氢化可的松三药联合治疗。第二组的高铁发生率为11%,另有11%的患者经历了恶性循环。根据这些数据,在药物前治疗方案中加入氢化可的松后,IR率保持不变,而HSR率显著下降超过25% (P=0.007)。结论:我们的回顾性队列研究提供了初步证据,表明在苯海拉明和法莫替丁两种药物的用药前方案中加入氢化可的松可以降低IV PEG的超敏反应率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
415
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JPHO) reports on major advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and blood diseases in children. The journal publishes original research, commentaries, historical insights, and clinical and laboratory observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信