Estrogen therapy in patients with gynecologic cancer: a survey of gynecologists and oncologists in the United States.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jamie L McDowell, Myla Strawderman, Sarah J Betstadt, Richard G Moore
{"title":"Estrogen therapy in patients with gynecologic cancer: a survey of gynecologists and oncologists in the United States.","authors":"Jamie L McDowell, Myla Strawderman, Sarah J Betstadt, Richard G Moore","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endometrial cancer (EC) and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) affect women of all ages, and the incidence of endometrial cancer in premenopausal women is rising. Menopause can be detrimental to longevity and quality of life, but evidence suggests estrogen therapy (ET) is safe in these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the practice patterns of gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists (GYO) in the United States in regards to prescription of ET to gynecologic cancer patients. It was hypothesized that ET is underused in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2024, a web-based survey was administered through email or postcard mailer to members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Participants were asked demographic questions and whether they provide ET for patients with a history of EC, EOC, and cervical cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 293 participants answered questions about at least one type of cancer. When asked if willing to provide ET, 63.82% (187/293) selected \"yes\" for EC, 65.19% (176/270) for EOC, and 96.8% (274/283) for cervical cancer. Due to lack of heterogeneity, cervical cancer was omitted from analysis. Gynecologic oncology providers were more likely than OBGYNs to prescribe ET for EC (P = 0.0006) and EOC patients (P = 0.0009). Those in practice for 10 or more years (P = 0.022), or who identified as male (P = 0.019), were more likely to prescribe ET to EC patients. Of those who do not prescribe ET, the most common reasons were belief that hormones are contraindicated, better options exist, and risk outweighs benefits. These options were selected more frequently by OBGYNs than GYOs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many gynecologists, and some gynecologic oncologists, are uncomfortable prescribing hormone therapy to patients with a history of endometrial or epithelial ovarian cancer, despite evidence suggesting its safety. This indicates a need for clinician education to ensure patients are counseled appropriately about options for treating menopausal symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Endometrial cancer (EC) and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) affect women of all ages, and the incidence of endometrial cancer in premenopausal women is rising. Menopause can be detrimental to longevity and quality of life, but evidence suggests estrogen therapy (ET) is safe in these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the practice patterns of gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists (GYO) in the United States in regards to prescription of ET to gynecologic cancer patients. It was hypothesized that ET is underused in this population.

Methods: In 2024, a web-based survey was administered through email or postcard mailer to members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Participants were asked demographic questions and whether they provide ET for patients with a history of EC, EOC, and cervical cancer.

Results: A total of 293 participants answered questions about at least one type of cancer. When asked if willing to provide ET, 63.82% (187/293) selected "yes" for EC, 65.19% (176/270) for EOC, and 96.8% (274/283) for cervical cancer. Due to lack of heterogeneity, cervical cancer was omitted from analysis. Gynecologic oncology providers were more likely than OBGYNs to prescribe ET for EC (P = 0.0006) and EOC patients (P = 0.0009). Those in practice for 10 or more years (P = 0.022), or who identified as male (P = 0.019), were more likely to prescribe ET to EC patients. Of those who do not prescribe ET, the most common reasons were belief that hormones are contraindicated, better options exist, and risk outweighs benefits. These options were selected more frequently by OBGYNs than GYOs.

Conclusion: Many gynecologists, and some gynecologic oncologists, are uncomfortable prescribing hormone therapy to patients with a history of endometrial or epithelial ovarian cancer, despite evidence suggesting its safety. This indicates a need for clinician education to ensure patients are counseled appropriately about options for treating menopausal symptoms.

妇科癌症患者的雌激素治疗:美国妇科医生和肿瘤学家的调查。
目的:子宫内膜癌(EC)和上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)影响各个年龄段的女性,绝经前妇女子宫内膜癌的发病率呈上升趋势。更年期可能对寿命和生活质量有害,但有证据表明雌激素治疗(ET)对这些患者是安全的。本研究的目的是评估美国妇科医生和妇科肿瘤学家(GYO)在妇科癌症患者的ET处方方面的实践模式。据推测,ET在这一人群中未得到充分利用。方法:在2024年,通过电子邮件或明信片向妇科肿瘤学会和美国妇产科医师学会的成员进行了一项基于网络的调查。参与者被问及人口统计学问题,以及他们是否为有EC、EOC和宫颈癌病史的患者提供ET。结果:共有293名参与者回答了至少一种癌症的问题。当被问及是否愿意提供ET时,63.82%(187/293)选择EC, 65.19%(176/270)选择EOC, 96.8%(274/283)选择宫颈癌。由于缺乏异质性,宫颈癌在分析中被省略。妇科肿瘤医生比妇产科医生更有可能给EC (P = 0.0006)和EOC患者开ET (P = 0.0009)。那些从业10年以上(P = 0.022)或男性(P = 0.019)的人更有可能给EC患者开ET。在那些不开ET的人中,最常见的原因是相信激素是禁忌症,有更好的选择,风险大于收益。这些选项被妇产科医生比妇产科医生更频繁地选择。结论:尽管有证据表明激素治疗是安全的,但许多妇科医生和一些妇科肿瘤学家还是不愿意给有子宫内膜癌或上皮性卵巢癌病史的患者开激素治疗的处方。这表明需要对临床医生进行教育,以确保患者在治疗更年期症状的选择方面得到适当的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信