Development of Diagnostic Reference Levels for Nuclear Medicine in Brazil: Insights from a University Hospital.

IF 1.3 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Lucas Paixão, Luciene G Mota, Stephanie S Freitas, Sandra M Dumont
{"title":"Development of Diagnostic Reference Levels for Nuclear Medicine in Brazil: Insights from a University Hospital.","authors":"Lucas Paixão, Luciene G Mota, Stephanie S Freitas, Sandra M Dumont","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.125.270129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are essential for optimizing radiologic practices and ensuring patient safety. This study aimed to establish typical DRLs for nuclear medicine (NM) procedures performed at a Brazilian public university hospital. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of 2,609 patient records from 13 routine NM procedures was conducted. Administered activities were analyzed to determine typical DRLs using the median (50th percentile), and data dispersion was evaluated using the interquartile range. Effective doses were estimated on the basis of International Commission on Radiological Protection dose coefficients. <b>Results:</b> For most procedures, typical DRLs were below the national reference levels, indicating optimized practices. Two procedures (static renal and parathyroid scintigraphy) had DRLs exceeding national values because of specific protocol adjustments. Elevated variability was observed in myocardial perfusion (1-d protocol) and lung perfusion procedures, attributed to clinical workflow constraints and individualized adjustments based on patient condition or clinical indications. Dosimetric estimates confirmed that all procedures were within safe exposure limits. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study reinforces the importance of establishing typical DRLs as a foundation for national DRL updates. The results provide valuable insights for optimizing NM practices in Brazil, supporting radiologic protection, and improving patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":16548,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.125.270129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are essential for optimizing radiologic practices and ensuring patient safety. This study aimed to establish typical DRLs for nuclear medicine (NM) procedures performed at a Brazilian public university hospital. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 2,609 patient records from 13 routine NM procedures was conducted. Administered activities were analyzed to determine typical DRLs using the median (50th percentile), and data dispersion was evaluated using the interquartile range. Effective doses were estimated on the basis of International Commission on Radiological Protection dose coefficients. Results: For most procedures, typical DRLs were below the national reference levels, indicating optimized practices. Two procedures (static renal and parathyroid scintigraphy) had DRLs exceeding national values because of specific protocol adjustments. Elevated variability was observed in myocardial perfusion (1-d protocol) and lung perfusion procedures, attributed to clinical workflow constraints and individualized adjustments based on patient condition or clinical indications. Dosimetric estimates confirmed that all procedures were within safe exposure limits. Conclusion: This study reinforces the importance of establishing typical DRLs as a foundation for national DRL updates. The results provide valuable insights for optimizing NM practices in Brazil, supporting radiologic protection, and improving patient safety.

巴西核医学诊断参考水平的发展:来自一所大学医院的见解。
诊断参考水平(drl)对于优化放射学实践和确保患者安全至关重要。本研究旨在建立在巴西公立大学医院进行的核医学(NM)手术的典型drl。方法:回顾性分析13例常规NM手术2,609例患者的记录。使用中位数(第50百分位)分析给药活动以确定典型drl,并使用四分位数范围评估数据离散度。有效剂量是根据国际放射防护委员会剂量系数估计的。结果:多数程序的典型drl低于国家参考水平,提示优化做法。两个程序(静态肾脏和甲状旁腺扫描)的drl超过国家价值,因为具体的方案调整。在心肌灌注(1-d方案)和肺灌注过程中观察到变异性升高,这归因于临床工作流程限制和基于患者病情或临床适应症的个体化调整。剂量学估计证实,所有程序都在安全暴露限度之内。结论:本研究强调了建立典型DRL作为国家DRL更新基础的重要性。研究结果为优化巴西的NM实践、支持放射防护和提高患者安全提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of nuclear medicine technology
Journal of nuclear medicine technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信