Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Omadacycline Versus Tigecycline in Treating Severe Pneumonia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Ye Zhang, Fei Wang, Min Wang, Wenhui Xu, Aiping Wang, Yueping Ding
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Omadacycline Versus Tigecycline in Treating Severe Pneumonia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Ye Zhang, Fei Wang, Min Wang, Wenhui Xu, Aiping Wang, Yueping Ding","doi":"10.2147/IDR.S541192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous omadacycline compared to intravenous tigecycline in patients with severe pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CRGNB), and to explore the factors influencing 28-day all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients with CRGNB-associated severe pneumonia who received intravenous omadacycline or tigecycline for at least 72 hours in the intensive care unit (ICU) between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2025. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality, while secondary endpoints included clinical efficacy and microbiological clearance rates. Safety was also assessed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with 28-day all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 patients with CRGNB-associated severe pneumonia were enrolled, including 43 in the omadacycline group and 37 in the tigecycline group. Compared with the tigecycline group, there was no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality (χ<sup>2</sup> = 2.882, p = 0.090) or microbiological clearance rate (58.14% vs 48.65%, p = 0.501) in the omadacycline group. However, the omadacycline group showed a significantly higher clinical efficacy rate (72.09% vs 43.24%, p = 0.012) and a markedly lower incidence of adverse events (4.65% vs 24.32%, p = 0.020). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that combination therapy with β-lactams was an independent predictor of reduced 28-day mortality, whereas central venous catheterization and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were independently associated with increased 28-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that omadacycline is comparable to tigecycline in clinical effectiveness for the treatment of CRGNB-associated severe pneumonia, while exhibiting a better safety profile. Novel tetracyclines may be used in combination with β-lactams for the treatment of severe pneumonia caused by CRGNB.</p>","PeriodicalId":13577,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Drug Resistance","volume":"18 ","pages":"4699-4710"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S541192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous omadacycline compared to intravenous tigecycline in patients with severe pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CRGNB), and to explore the factors influencing 28-day all-cause mortality.
Methods: Our retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients with CRGNB-associated severe pneumonia who received intravenous omadacycline or tigecycline for at least 72 hours in the intensive care unit (ICU) between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2025. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality, while secondary endpoints included clinical efficacy and microbiological clearance rates. Safety was also assessed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with 28-day all-cause mortality.
Results: A total of 80 patients with CRGNB-associated severe pneumonia were enrolled, including 43 in the omadacycline group and 37 in the tigecycline group. Compared with the tigecycline group, there was no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality (χ2 = 2.882, p = 0.090) or microbiological clearance rate (58.14% vs 48.65%, p = 0.501) in the omadacycline group. However, the omadacycline group showed a significantly higher clinical efficacy rate (72.09% vs 43.24%, p = 0.012) and a markedly lower incidence of adverse events (4.65% vs 24.32%, p = 0.020). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that combination therapy with β-lactams was an independent predictor of reduced 28-day mortality, whereas central venous catheterization and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were independently associated with increased 28-day mortality.
Conclusion: Our study found that omadacycline is comparable to tigecycline in clinical effectiveness for the treatment of CRGNB-associated severe pneumonia, while exhibiting a better safety profile. Novel tetracyclines may be used in combination with β-lactams for the treatment of severe pneumonia caused by CRGNB.
目的:比较静脉注射奥马达环素与静脉注射替加环素治疗耐碳青霉烯革兰氏阴性杆菌(CRGNB)所致重症肺炎患者的临床疗效和安全性,并探讨其28天全因死亡率的影响因素。方法:回顾性分析2023年4月1日至2025年3月31日期间在重症监护病房(ICU)接受静脉注射奥马达环素或替加环素至少72小时的crgnb相关性重症肺炎成年患者。主要终点是28天全因死亡率,次要终点包括临床疗效和微生物清除率。安全性也进行了评估。采用Logistic回归分析确定与28天全因死亡率相关的因素。结果:共纳入80例crgnb相关性重症肺炎患者,其中奥马达环素组43例,替加环素组37例。与替加环素组比较,奥马达环素组28天死亡率(χ2 = 2.882, p = 0.090)、微生物清除率(58.14% vs 48.65%, p = 0.501)差异无统计学意义。而奥马达环素组临床有效率明显高于对照组(72.09% vs 43.24%, p = 0.012),不良事件发生率明显低于对照组(4.65% vs 24.32%, p = 0.020)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,β-内酰胺类药物联合治疗是降低28天死亡率的独立预测因素,而中心静脉置管和基线c反应蛋白(CRP)水平与28天死亡率增加独立相关。结论:我们的研究发现,在治疗crgnb相关性重症肺炎的临床疗效方面,奥马达环素与替加环素相当,同时表现出更好的安全性。新型四环素类药物可与β-内酰胺类药物联合用于治疗CRGNB所致重症肺炎。
期刊介绍:
About Journal
Editors
Peer Reviewers
Articles
Article Publishing Charges
Aims and Scope
Call For Papers
ISSN: 1178-6973
Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suresh Antony
An international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the optimal treatment of infection (bacterial, fungal and viral) and the development and institution of preventative strategies to minimize the development and spread of resistance.