Barriers and facilitators to usability of a smartphone-based digital mental health tool in older adults: Insights from a secondary analysis of mindLAMP.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Elombe Calvert, Katherine Hackett, John Torous, Tania Giovannetti
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to usability of a smartphone-based digital mental health tool in older adults: Insights from a secondary analysis of mindLAMP.","authors":"Elombe Calvert, Katherine Hackett, John Torous, Tania Giovannetti","doi":"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As demand for mental healthcare access grows among older adult populations, digital mental health tools have emerged as promising tools. However, bridging the digital divide among older technology users remains critical. This post-hoc analysis evaluated potential factors influencing the adoption of a digital mental health tool in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 37 older adults who used a digital phenotyping app (mindLAMP) for 4 weeks to capture passive sensor data and complete nightly surveys. We examined associations between baseline participant features including demographics, cognition, mood, technology attitudes and use, and usability outcomes including app training metrics, adherence, and self-reported usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants had a mean age of 72, with most identifying as female (68 %), college educated (76 %), retired (81 %), and White (59 %). The app demonstrated high usability, with baseline training averaging 20.2 (±6.5) minutes and 80 % nightly survey completion. At study completion, 30/37 participants reported finding the app easy to use. While not significant after correction, female sex, Black race, and some college education emerged as potentially promising factors associated with better usability outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that with modest training, older adults can engage with digital health tools and report positive usability experiences. Differences in usability outcomes by sex, race, and education point to potential characteristics that may influence engagement. However, given the small, highly educated sample, these findings should be replicated in larger, more diverse cohorts to better understand which factors support the successful use of digital health tools in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"100123"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As demand for mental healthcare access grows among older adult populations, digital mental health tools have emerged as promising tools. However, bridging the digital divide among older technology users remains critical. This post-hoc analysis evaluated potential factors influencing the adoption of a digital mental health tool in older adults.

Methods: We analyzed data from 37 older adults who used a digital phenotyping app (mindLAMP) for 4 weeks to capture passive sensor data and complete nightly surveys. We examined associations between baseline participant features including demographics, cognition, mood, technology attitudes and use, and usability outcomes including app training metrics, adherence, and self-reported usability.

Results: Participants had a mean age of 72, with most identifying as female (68 %), college educated (76 %), retired (81 %), and White (59 %). The app demonstrated high usability, with baseline training averaging 20.2 (±6.5) minutes and 80 % nightly survey completion. At study completion, 30/37 participants reported finding the app easy to use. While not significant after correction, female sex, Black race, and some college education emerged as potentially promising factors associated with better usability outcomes.

Discussion: These findings suggest that with modest training, older adults can engage with digital health tools and report positive usability experiences. Differences in usability outcomes by sex, race, and education point to potential characteristics that may influence engagement. However, given the small, highly educated sample, these findings should be replicated in larger, more diverse cohorts to better understand which factors support the successful use of digital health tools in older adults.

老年人使用基于智能手机的数字心理健康工具的障碍和促进因素:来自mindLAMP的二次分析的见解。
背景:随着老年人口对精神卫生保健服务需求的增长,数字精神卫生工具已成为有前途的工具。然而,弥合老技术用户之间的数字鸿沟仍然至关重要。这项事后分析评估了影响老年人采用数字心理健康工具的潜在因素。方法:我们分析了37名老年人的数据,这些老年人使用数字表型应用程序(mindLAMP)进行为期4周的被动传感器数据采集并完成夜间调查。我们研究了基线参与者特征(包括人口统计、认知、情绪、技术态度和使用)与可用性结果(包括应用程序培训指标、依从性和自我报告的可用性)之间的关联。结果:参与者的平均年龄为72岁,其中大多数是女性(68%),受过大学教育(76%),退休(81%)和白人(59%)。该应用程序显示出高可用性,基线训练平均为20.2(±6.5)分钟,夜间调查完成率为80%。在研究结束时,30/37的参与者报告说,他们发现这个应用程序很容易使用。女性性别、黑人种族和一些大学教育程度在修正后并不显著,但与更好的可用性结果相关的潜在有希望的因素出现了。讨论:这些发现表明,经过适当的培训,老年人可以使用数字健康工具并报告积极的可用性体验。性别、种族和教育在可用性结果上的差异指向了可能影响用户粘性的潜在特征。然而,鉴于样本规模小,受教育程度高,这些发现应该在更大,更多样化的队列中得到复制,以更好地了解哪些因素支持老年人成功使用数字健康工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信