Progression-free survival as a surrogate of overall survival in metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer: an EORTC gynecologic cancer group study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ramon Yarza, Aranzazu Barquin, Giuseppe Caruso, Helena Guedes, Melpomeni Kountouri, Jose Manuel Estrada-Lorenzo, Giorgio Bogani, Corneel Coens, Fernanda Herrera, Judith Kroep, Ainhoa Madariaga
{"title":"Progression-free survival as a surrogate of overall survival in metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer: an EORTC gynecologic cancer group study.","authors":"Ramon Yarza, Aranzazu Barquin, Giuseppe Caruso, Helena Guedes, Melpomeni Kountouri, Jose Manuel Estrada-Lorenzo, Giorgio Bogani, Corneel Coens, Fernanda Herrera, Judith Kroep, Ainhoa Madariaga","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The value of progression-free survival as a surrogate marker for overall survival remains a matter of debate. Herein, we evaluated the validity of progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in trials of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Standardized treatment effects (z-scores) for progression-free-survival and overall survival were derived from reported HRs. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and surrogate threshold effect (STE) were calculated to assess surrogacy according to German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care guidelines. Sub-group analyses were performed by treatment modality, line of therapy, and prior radiotherapy exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen randomized trials encompassing 25 treatment comparisons and 10,381 patients with recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer were included. A strong correlation was observed between z<sub>PFS</sub> and z<sub>OS</sub> across all studies (r = 0.82, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.92, p < .001). The STE was 3.07, indicating that moderate-to-large progression-free-survival benefits are required to predict overall-survival improvement. Correlation was strongest among chemoimmunotherapy trials (r = 0.87, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.98, p = .011, STE = 3.34), while chemotherapy-alone trials showed a weak and non-significant association (r = 0.42, 95% CI -0.49 to 0.89, p = .35, STE = 3.64). Surrogacy appeared stronger in post-first-line trials and in studies with limited prior radiotherapy exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Progression-free survival shows a strong but context-dependent correlation with overall survival among endometrial cancer trials. While it may serve as a valid surrogate marker, particularly in chemoimmunotherapy, its reliability varies by treatment context. These findings support the selective use of progression-free survival as a surrogate in endometrial cancer and underscore the importance of tailored endpoint strategies in oncology trial design.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 11","pages":"102115"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The value of progression-free survival as a surrogate marker for overall survival remains a matter of debate. Herein, we evaluated the validity of progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in trials of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Standardized treatment effects (z-scores) for progression-free-survival and overall survival were derived from reported HRs. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and surrogate threshold effect (STE) were calculated to assess surrogacy according to German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care guidelines. Sub-group analyses were performed by treatment modality, line of therapy, and prior radiotherapy exposure.

Results: Sixteen randomized trials encompassing 25 treatment comparisons and 10,381 patients with recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer were included. A strong correlation was observed between zPFS and zOS across all studies (r = 0.82, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.92, p < .001). The STE was 3.07, indicating that moderate-to-large progression-free-survival benefits are required to predict overall-survival improvement. Correlation was strongest among chemoimmunotherapy trials (r = 0.87, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.98, p = .011, STE = 3.34), while chemotherapy-alone trials showed a weak and non-significant association (r = 0.42, 95% CI -0.49 to 0.89, p = .35, STE = 3.64). Surrogacy appeared stronger in post-first-line trials and in studies with limited prior radiotherapy exposure.

Conclusions: Progression-free survival shows a strong but context-dependent correlation with overall survival among endometrial cancer trials. While it may serve as a valid surrogate marker, particularly in chemoimmunotherapy, its reliability varies by treatment context. These findings support the selective use of progression-free survival as a surrogate in endometrial cancer and underscore the importance of tailored endpoint strategies in oncology trial design.

无进展生存期作为转移性或复发性子宫内膜癌总生存期的替代:EORTC妇科癌症组研究
目的:无进展生存期作为总生存期替代指标的价值仍然存在争议。在此,我们评估了无进展生存期作为复发或转移性子宫内膜癌试验中总生存期的替代终点的有效性。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析。无进展生存期和总生存期的标准化治疗效果(z分数)来源于报告的hr。根据德国卫生保健质量和效率研究所指南,计算Pearson相关系数(r)和代孕阈值效应(STE)来评估代孕。亚组分析按治疗方式、治疗线和既往放疗暴露进行。结果:16个随机试验包括25个治疗比较和10,381例复发或转移性子宫内膜癌患者。在所有研究中观察到zPFS和zOS之间有很强的相关性(r = 0.82, 95% CI 0.63 ~ 0.92, p < 0.001)。STE为3.07,表明预测总体生存改善需要中等到较大的无进展生存获益。化疗免疫试验的相关性最强(r = 0.87, 95% CI 0.34 ~ 0.98, p = 0.011, STE = 3.34),而单独化疗试验的相关性较弱且不显著(r = 0.42, 95% CI -0.49 ~ 0.89, p = 0.35, STE = 3.64)。在一线后试验和之前有限放疗暴露的研究中,代孕表现得更强。结论:在子宫内膜癌试验中,无进展生存期与总生存期有很强的相关性,但与环境相关。虽然它可以作为一种有效的替代标志物,特别是在化学免疫治疗中,但其可靠性因治疗环境而异。这些发现支持在子宫内膜癌中选择性地使用无进展生存期作为替代指标,并强调了在肿瘤试验设计中定制终点策略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信