Territorial equity assessment within a colorectal cancer screening program: Usefulness of colonoscopy quality indicators.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Rebeca Font, Anna Serradesanferm, Ramon Clèries, Judit Solà, Maria Pellisé, Francesc Balaguer, Josep M Castellví, Oscar Navarro-Campàs, Natàlia Pascual-Argente, Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Josep A Espinàs, Antoni Castells
{"title":"Territorial equity assessment within a colorectal cancer screening program: Usefulness of colonoscopy quality indicators.","authors":"Rebeca Font, Anna Serradesanferm, Ramon Clèries, Judit Solà, Maria Pellisé, Francesc Balaguer, Josep M Castellví, Oscar Navarro-Campàs, Natàlia Pascual-Argente, Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Josep A Espinàs, Antoni Castells","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2025.502559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary goal of a public health system is to ensure universal access to high-quality medical care. However, disparities in health outcomes have been observed across socio-demographic groups, some of them potentially related to their geographical location. To assess territorial equity, the Catalan Colorectal Cancer Screening Program was used, focusing on the adenoma detection rate (ADR) endoscopists.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This population-based screening program is based on fecal immunochemical testing. Positive individuals undergo colonoscopy in the endoscopy unit corresponding to their area of residence. Both ADR and serrated polyp detection rate (SPDR) of all endoscopists were assessed and reported in terms of variability among endoscopy units and proportion of endoscopists who did not reach pre-established quality standards (40% and 20%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35,825 colonoscopies performed by 206 endoscopists of 39 endoscopy units were evaluated. Analysis of ADR variability revealed that 11 units (28.2%) performed significantly above the average of Catalonia, while 3 units (7.7%) performed below it. In terms of SPDR variability, 22 units (56.4%) significantly exceeded the average, whereas 8 units (20.5%) fell below this benchmark. Moreover, all endoscopists in 28 units (71.8%) achieved the ADR threshold of 40%, while this was the case in only 12 (30.8%) when using the SPDR threshold of 20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality of colonoscopy, measured by the ADR, was high with minimal variability among units; however, using the SPDR revealed greater variability. This analysis underscores the value of indicators derived from screening programs as essential tools for evaluating potential territorial inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":" ","pages":"502559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2025.502559","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary goal of a public health system is to ensure universal access to high-quality medical care. However, disparities in health outcomes have been observed across socio-demographic groups, some of them potentially related to their geographical location. To assess territorial equity, the Catalan Colorectal Cancer Screening Program was used, focusing on the adenoma detection rate (ADR) endoscopists.

Patients and methods: This population-based screening program is based on fecal immunochemical testing. Positive individuals undergo colonoscopy in the endoscopy unit corresponding to their area of residence. Both ADR and serrated polyp detection rate (SPDR) of all endoscopists were assessed and reported in terms of variability among endoscopy units and proportion of endoscopists who did not reach pre-established quality standards (40% and 20%, respectively).

Results: A total of 35,825 colonoscopies performed by 206 endoscopists of 39 endoscopy units were evaluated. Analysis of ADR variability revealed that 11 units (28.2%) performed significantly above the average of Catalonia, while 3 units (7.7%) performed below it. In terms of SPDR variability, 22 units (56.4%) significantly exceeded the average, whereas 8 units (20.5%) fell below this benchmark. Moreover, all endoscopists in 28 units (71.8%) achieved the ADR threshold of 40%, while this was the case in only 12 (30.8%) when using the SPDR threshold of 20%.

Conclusion: Quality of colonoscopy, measured by the ADR, was high with minimal variability among units; however, using the SPDR revealed greater variability. This analysis underscores the value of indicators derived from screening programs as essential tools for evaluating potential territorial inequities.

结直肠癌筛查项目的地域公平性评估:结肠镜检查质量指标的有效性。
目标:公共卫生系统的主要目标是确保普遍获得高质量的医疗服务。然而,在社会人口群体中观察到健康结果的差异,其中一些可能与其地理位置有关。为了评估区域公平,使用加泰罗尼亚结直肠癌筛查计划,重点关注内窥镜医师的腺瘤检出率(ADR)。患者和方法:这种基于人群的筛查方案是基于粪便免疫化学测试。阳性个体在与其居住区域相对应的内窥镜检查单位进行结肠镜检查。对所有内镜医师的不良反应和锯齿状息肉检出率(SPDR)进行评估,并根据不同内镜单位的变异性和未达到预先建立的质量标准的内镜医师比例(分别为40%和20%)进行报告。结果:对39个内镜单位206名内镜医师共35,825例结肠镜检查进行了评估。对ADR变异性的分析显示,11个单位(28.2%)的表现明显高于加泰罗尼亚的平均水平,而3个单位(7.7%)的表现低于平均水平。在SPDR可变性方面,22个单位(56.4%)明显超过平均水平,而8个单位(20.5%)低于该基准。此外,28个单位(71.8%)的内镜医师均达到了40%的ADR阈值,而在使用20%的SPDR阈值时,仅有12个单位(30.8%)达到了ADR阈值。结论:以不良反应(ADR)衡量的结肠镜检查质量较高,各单位间差异极小;然而,使用SPDR显示出更大的变异性。这一分析强调了从筛查项目中得出的指标作为评估潜在地域不平等的重要工具的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology and Hepatology is the first journal to cover the latest advances in pathology of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, pancreas, and bile ducts, making it an indispensable tool for gastroenterologists, hepatologists, internists and general practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信