Patients as partners in medical publications: the ISMPP journey of engagement.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Simon R Stones, Dawn Lobban, Catherine Skobe, Nichola Gokool, Trishna Bharadia, Anna Geraci, Robert J Matheis
{"title":"Patients as partners in medical publications: the ISMPP journey of engagement.","authors":"Simon R Stones, Dawn Lobban, Catherine Skobe, Nichola Gokool, Trishna Bharadia, Anna Geraci, Robert J Matheis","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2556317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient engagement (PE) has evolved from an emerging concept to a fundamental ethos underpinning healthcare research and communication. In this commentary, we explore the historical evolution in medical research from patients being participants in clinical trials to becoming integral partners in communicating medical research findings. The progression from \"why\" to \"how\" PE should occur represents a fundamental shift in the medical publication landscape. We also highlight the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals' (ISMPP) journey in embracing and advancing PE within medical publications through ISMPP's initiatives and activities, including the establishment of its PE Task Force, patient membership, and support programs, while examining the cultural transformations occurring within the profession. Looking ahead, we discuss opportunities for expanding patient roles, improving accessibility to tools and frameworks, and integrating patient perspectives into leadership positions. This commentary serves as both a reflective narrative and a call to action for medical publication professionals to champion authentic and meaningful PE, ensuring publications truly engage and serve the patients at the heart of the research they describe, as exemplified by ISMPP.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2556317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient engagement (PE) has evolved from an emerging concept to a fundamental ethos underpinning healthcare research and communication. In this commentary, we explore the historical evolution in medical research from patients being participants in clinical trials to becoming integral partners in communicating medical research findings. The progression from "why" to "how" PE should occur represents a fundamental shift in the medical publication landscape. We also highlight the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals' (ISMPP) journey in embracing and advancing PE within medical publications through ISMPP's initiatives and activities, including the establishment of its PE Task Force, patient membership, and support programs, while examining the cultural transformations occurring within the profession. Looking ahead, we discuss opportunities for expanding patient roles, improving accessibility to tools and frameworks, and integrating patient perspectives into leadership positions. This commentary serves as both a reflective narrative and a call to action for medical publication professionals to champion authentic and meaningful PE, ensuring publications truly engage and serve the patients at the heart of the research they describe, as exemplified by ISMPP.

患者作为医学出版物的合作伙伴:ISMPP的参与之旅。
患者参与(PE)已经从一个新兴概念演变为支持医疗保健研究和交流的基本精神。在这篇评论中,我们探讨了医学研究的历史演变,从患者参与临床试验到成为交流医学研究成果的不可或缺的合作伙伴。从“为什么”到“如何”PE应该发生的进展代表了医学出版物领域的根本转变。我们还重点介绍了国际医学出版专业人员协会(ISMPP)通过其倡议和活动在医学出版物中拥抱和推进体育运动的历程,包括建立其体育工作小组,患者会员资格和支持计划,同时检查行业内发生的文化转变。展望未来,我们将讨论扩大患者角色、改善工具和框架的可及性以及将患者观点纳入领导职位的机会。这篇评论既是一种反思的叙述,也是对医学出版物专业人员的行动呼吁,以支持真实和有意义的体育运动,确保出版物真正参与并服务于他们所描述的研究的核心,如ISMPP的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信