{"title":"Plasma glucose and HbA1c discrepancy may indicate hemoglobinopathy: a case series.","authors":"Gulru Birce Sonmezoz","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2557519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic disease characterised by elevated plasma glucose (PG) levels. HbA1c has been widely utilized for diabetes diagnosis. However, certain conditions restrict its use. In such cases, plasma glucose (PG) measurements and self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) are recommended. This case series highlights the importance of considering both HbA1c and PG or SMBG in the evaluation of patients with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>This case series presents three cases of patients with diabetes who exhibited a discrepancy between PG and HbA1c levels. Only one patient demonstrated isolated microcytosis, while the remaining two had completely normal hematologic profiles. Due to this discrepancy, hemoglobin electrophoresis was conducted, revealing various hemoglobinopathies in all cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with discrepancies between PG levels and HbA1c, we suggest a thorough evaluation that includes consideration of potential hemoglobinopathies. These hemoglobin variants can present with isolated microcytosis or entirely normal hematologic parameters and may lead to falsely low HbA1c values. In cases of discordance between PG and HbA1c, hemoglobin electrophoresis can serve as a valuable diagnostic tool. Identifying hemoglobinopathies before determining treatment regimens can help mitigate the risk of complications from inadequate treatment, and awareness of HbA1c limitations allows clinicians to use both HbA1c and PG/SMBG to optimize diabetes management and minimize the risk of diabetic complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2557519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic disease characterised by elevated plasma glucose (PG) levels. HbA1c has been widely utilized for diabetes diagnosis. However, certain conditions restrict its use. In such cases, plasma glucose (PG) measurements and self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) are recommended. This case series highlights the importance of considering both HbA1c and PG or SMBG in the evaluation of patients with diabetes.
Case report: This case series presents three cases of patients with diabetes who exhibited a discrepancy between PG and HbA1c levels. Only one patient demonstrated isolated microcytosis, while the remaining two had completely normal hematologic profiles. Due to this discrepancy, hemoglobin electrophoresis was conducted, revealing various hemoglobinopathies in all cases.
Conclusion: For patients with discrepancies between PG levels and HbA1c, we suggest a thorough evaluation that includes consideration of potential hemoglobinopathies. These hemoglobin variants can present with isolated microcytosis or entirely normal hematologic parameters and may lead to falsely low HbA1c values. In cases of discordance between PG and HbA1c, hemoglobin electrophoresis can serve as a valuable diagnostic tool. Identifying hemoglobinopathies before determining treatment regimens can help mitigate the risk of complications from inadequate treatment, and awareness of HbA1c limitations allows clinicians to use both HbA1c and PG/SMBG to optimize diabetes management and minimize the risk of diabetic complications.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance