Compositionality in the semantic network: a model-driven representational similarity analysis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Marco Ciapparelli, Marco Marelli, William Graves, Carlo Reverberi
{"title":"Compositionality in the semantic network: a model-driven representational similarity analysis.","authors":"Marco Ciapparelli, Marco Marelli, William Graves, Carlo Reverberi","doi":"10.1093/cercor/bhaf246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Semantic composition allows us to construct complex meanings (e.g., \"dog house\", \"house dog\") from simpler constituents (\"dog\", \"house\"). Neuroimaging studies have often relied on high-level contrasts (e.g., meaningful > non-meaningful phrases) to identify brain regions sensitive to composition. However, such an approach is less apt at addressing how composition is carried out, namely what functions best characterize constituents integration. Here, we rely on simple computational models to explicitly characterize alternative compositional operations, and use representational similarity analysis to compare models to target regions of interest. We re-analyze fMRI data aggregated from four published studies (N = 85), all employing two-word combinations but differing in task requirements. Confirmatory and exploratory analyses reveal compositional representations in the left inferior frontal gyrus (BA45), even when the task did not require semantic access. These results suggest that BA45 represents combinatorial information automatically across task demands, and further characterize composition as the (symmetric) intersection of constituent features. Additionally, a cluster of compositional representations emerges in the left middle superior temporal sulcus, while semantic, but not compositional, representations are observed in the left angular gyrus. Overall, our work clarifies which brain regions represent semantic information compositionally across contexts and tasks, and qualifies which operations best describe composition.</p>","PeriodicalId":9715,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral cortex","volume":"35 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral cortex","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaf246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Semantic composition allows us to construct complex meanings (e.g., "dog house", "house dog") from simpler constituents ("dog", "house"). Neuroimaging studies have often relied on high-level contrasts (e.g., meaningful > non-meaningful phrases) to identify brain regions sensitive to composition. However, such an approach is less apt at addressing how composition is carried out, namely what functions best characterize constituents integration. Here, we rely on simple computational models to explicitly characterize alternative compositional operations, and use representational similarity analysis to compare models to target regions of interest. We re-analyze fMRI data aggregated from four published studies (N = 85), all employing two-word combinations but differing in task requirements. Confirmatory and exploratory analyses reveal compositional representations in the left inferior frontal gyrus (BA45), even when the task did not require semantic access. These results suggest that BA45 represents combinatorial information automatically across task demands, and further characterize composition as the (symmetric) intersection of constituent features. Additionally, a cluster of compositional representations emerges in the left middle superior temporal sulcus, while semantic, but not compositional, representations are observed in the left angular gyrus. Overall, our work clarifies which brain regions represent semantic information compositionally across contexts and tasks, and qualifies which operations best describe composition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

语义网络中的组合性:模型驱动的表征相似性分析。
语义组合允许我们从更简单的成分(“狗”,“房子”)构建复杂的含义(例如,“狗房子”,“房子狗”)。神经影像学研究通常依赖于高水平对比(例如,有意义的和无意义的短语)来识别对成分敏感的大脑区域。然而,这种方法不太适合解决如何进行组合的问题,即哪些功能最好地描述了组件集成。在这里,我们依靠简单的计算模型来明确表征可选择的组合操作,并使用表征相似性分析来比较模型与感兴趣的目标区域。我们重新分析了来自四项已发表研究(N = 85)的fMRI数据,所有研究均采用双词组合,但任务要求不同。验证性和探索性分析表明,即使在任务不需要语义访问时,左侧额下回(BA45)也存在组成表征。这些结果表明,BA45自动表示跨任务需求的组合信息,并进一步将组合表征为组成特征的(对称)交集。此外,在左侧中颞上沟中出现了一组组合表征,而在左侧角回中观察到语义表征,而不是组合表征。总的来说,我们的工作澄清了哪些大脑区域代表跨上下文和任务的语义信息组合,并限定了哪些操作最能描述组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebral cortex
Cerebral cortex 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
510
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Cerebral Cortex publishes papers on the development, organization, plasticity, and function of the cerebral cortex, including the hippocampus. Studies with clear relevance to the cerebral cortex, such as the thalamocortical relationship or cortico-subcortical interactions, are also included. The journal is multidisciplinary and covers the large variety of modern neurobiological and neuropsychological techniques, including anatomy, biochemistry, molecular neurobiology, electrophysiology, behavior, artificial intelligence, and theoretical modeling. In addition to research articles, special features such as brief reviews, book reviews, and commentaries are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信