[Area-level socioeconomic deprivation, socioeconomic status, and depressive symptoms: a multilevel analysis using data from the GEDA 2019/2020 study].

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lina Wollgast, Christina Kersjes, Claudia Hövener, Niels Michalski
{"title":"[Area-level socioeconomic deprivation, socioeconomic status, and depressive symptoms: a multilevel analysis using data from the GEDA 2019/2020 study].","authors":"Lina Wollgast, Christina Kersjes, Claudia Hövener, Niels Michalski","doi":"10.1007/s00103-025-04123-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of mental disorders in Germany is associated with socioeconomic position. International studies further indicate area-level correlations linking higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation with increased mental health burdens. However, these area-level associations have not yet been systematically examined in Germany and it is unclear whether socioeconomic disparities in mental health outcomes are contingent upon area-level socioeconomic deprivation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Representative data from the German Health Update survey (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) (N = 21,876) are used to estimate and visualize depressive symptoms prevalence (Patient Health Questionnaire- 8 ≥ 10) via small-area estimation. Prevalence rates are analyzed stratified by socioeconomic position (education and income) and by the degree of area-level socioeconomic deprivation in the residential municipalities. Multiple logistic multilevel regression models are employed to adjust for confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of depressive symptoms does not exhibit a systematic geographical distribution across German districts. However, risk of depression is significantly higher in highly (Odds Ratio = 3.29) and moderately (Odds Ratio = 1.86) socioeconomically deprived municipalities compared to low-deprivation municipalities. Additionally, there are clear educational and income disparities to the detriment of individuals with a lower socioeconomic position. These differences are more pronounced in highly deprived regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Area-level socioeconomic deprivation is a key risk factor for compromised mental health in Germany. Individuals with lower education and income in deprived areas are particularly vulnerable, highlighting the need for targeted interventions and policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"1118-1127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04123-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of mental disorders in Germany is associated with socioeconomic position. International studies further indicate area-level correlations linking higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation with increased mental health burdens. However, these area-level associations have not yet been systematically examined in Germany and it is unclear whether socioeconomic disparities in mental health outcomes are contingent upon area-level socioeconomic deprivation.

Methods: Representative data from the German Health Update survey (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) (N = 21,876) are used to estimate and visualize depressive symptoms prevalence (Patient Health Questionnaire- 8 ≥ 10) via small-area estimation. Prevalence rates are analyzed stratified by socioeconomic position (education and income) and by the degree of area-level socioeconomic deprivation in the residential municipalities. Multiple logistic multilevel regression models are employed to adjust for confounding.

Results: The prevalence of depressive symptoms does not exhibit a systematic geographical distribution across German districts. However, risk of depression is significantly higher in highly (Odds Ratio = 3.29) and moderately (Odds Ratio = 1.86) socioeconomically deprived municipalities compared to low-deprivation municipalities. Additionally, there are clear educational and income disparities to the detriment of individuals with a lower socioeconomic position. These differences are more pronounced in highly deprived regions.

Conclusion: Area-level socioeconomic deprivation is a key risk factor for compromised mental health in Germany. Individuals with lower education and income in deprived areas are particularly vulnerable, highlighting the need for targeted interventions and policies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

[地区层面的社会经济剥夺、社会经济地位和抑郁症状:使用GEDA 2019/2020研究数据的多层次分析]。
背景:德国精神障碍的患病率与社会经济地位有关。国际研究进一步表明,在地区层面上,社会经济剥夺程度越高,心理健康负担就越重。然而,在德国,这些地区层面的关联尚未得到系统的研究,目前尚不清楚心理健康结果的社会经济差异是否取决于地区层面的社会经济剥夺。方法:使用德国健康更新调查(GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS)的代表性数据(N = 21,876),通过小区域估计估计和可视化抑郁症状的患病率(患者健康问卷- 8 ≥10)。患病率按社会经济地位(教育和收入)和居住城市地区一级社会经济剥夺程度分层分析。采用多逻辑多水平回归模型对混杂因素进行校正。结果:抑郁症状的患病率在德国各地区没有表现出系统的地理分布。然而,与低社会经济剥夺的城市相比,重度(优势比 = 3.29)和中度(优势比 = 1.86)社会经济剥夺的城市患抑郁症的风险明显更高。此外,明显的教育和收入差距对社会经济地位较低的个人不利。这些差异在高度贫困地区更为明显。结论:地区层面的社会经济剥夺是德国心理健康受损的关键危险因素。贫困地区受教育程度和收入较低的个人尤其容易受到伤害,因此需要有针对性的干预措施和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信