Impact of diagnostic laparoscopy on resectability and treatment strategy in FIGO III-IV ovarian cancer.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
H Endres, D Dayan, F Ebner, S Huwer, D Jakob, M Medl, L Yagcioglu, I Juhasz-Boess, F A Taran, L Jung
{"title":"Impact of diagnostic laparoscopy on resectability and treatment strategy in FIGO III-IV ovarian cancer.","authors":"H Endres, D Dayan, F Ebner, S Huwer, D Jakob, M Medl, L Yagcioglu, I Juhasz-Boess, F A Taran, L Jung","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-08173-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical utility of diagnostic laparoscopy in guiding treatment strategy and surgical outcomes for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer, specifically regarding operability assessment and the likelihood of complete cytoreduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 183 patients with histologically confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III-IV ovarian cancer treated with curative intent between January 2018 and December 2023 at a tertiary referral center. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy prior to primary treatment (n = 80) and those managed without laparoscopy (n = 103). Laparoscopy was selectively employed when operability was uncertain. The primary outcome was the rate of complete macroscopic tumor resection. Secondary endpoints included intraoperative inoperability, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) rates, and surgical complexity. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and predictive value calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete macroscopic resection was achieved in 57.5% of patients in the laparoscopy group compared to 68.0% in the control group. Among FIGO III cases, complete resection was lower in the laparoscopy group (63.0% vs. 77.0%), while rates were similar for FIGO IV (53.8% vs. 54.8%). Diagnostic laparoscopy had a positive predictive value of 59% and was a statistically significant, albeit weak, predictor of operability (p = 0.003, phi = 0.13). Patients in the laparoscopy group were more frequently triaged to NACT (78.8% vs. 50.5%). Intraoperative inoperability was also higher (29% vs. 14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diagnostic laparoscopy influenced treatment strategy by increasing NACT use and reducing non-beneficial surgeries. Though it did not improve overall cytoreduction rates, it enabled personalized treatment planning, especially in patients with ambiguous resectability, thereby potentially lowering surgical morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08173-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical utility of diagnostic laparoscopy in guiding treatment strategy and surgical outcomes for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer, specifically regarding operability assessment and the likelihood of complete cytoreduction.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 183 patients with histologically confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III-IV ovarian cancer treated with curative intent between January 2018 and December 2023 at a tertiary referral center. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy prior to primary treatment (n = 80) and those managed without laparoscopy (n = 103). Laparoscopy was selectively employed when operability was uncertain. The primary outcome was the rate of complete macroscopic tumor resection. Secondary endpoints included intraoperative inoperability, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) rates, and surgical complexity. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and predictive value calculations.

Results: Complete macroscopic resection was achieved in 57.5% of patients in the laparoscopy group compared to 68.0% in the control group. Among FIGO III cases, complete resection was lower in the laparoscopy group (63.0% vs. 77.0%), while rates were similar for FIGO IV (53.8% vs. 54.8%). Diagnostic laparoscopy had a positive predictive value of 59% and was a statistically significant, albeit weak, predictor of operability (p = 0.003, phi = 0.13). Patients in the laparoscopy group were more frequently triaged to NACT (78.8% vs. 50.5%). Intraoperative inoperability was also higher (29% vs. 14%).

Conclusion: Diagnostic laparoscopy influenced treatment strategy by increasing NACT use and reducing non-beneficial surgeries. Though it did not improve overall cytoreduction rates, it enabled personalized treatment planning, especially in patients with ambiguous resectability, thereby potentially lowering surgical morbidity.

诊断性腹腔镜对FIGO III-IV型卵巢癌可切除性及治疗策略的影响。
目的:探讨诊断性腹腔镜在指导晚期卵巢癌患者治疗策略和手术效果方面的临床应用,特别是在可操作性评估和完全细胞减少的可能性方面。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2018年1月至2023年12月在三级转诊中心接受组织学证实的国际妇产科学联合会(FIGO) III-IV期卵巢癌治疗的183例患者。患者被分为两组:在初次治疗前接受腹腔镜诊断的患者(n = 80)和未接受腹腔镜治疗的患者(n = 103)。当手术不确定时,选择性采用腹腔镜。主要观察指标为肿瘤肉眼完全切除率。次要终点包括术中不可操作性、新辅助化疗(NACT)率和手术复杂性。统计分析包括卡方检验和预测值计算。结果:腹腔镜组57.5%的患者实现了肉眼完全切除,而对照组为68.0%。在FIGO III病例中,腹腔镜组的完全切除率较低(63.0%比77.0%),而FIGO IV组的完全切除率相似(53.8%比54.8%)。诊断性腹腔镜检查的阳性预测值为59%,虽然预测操作性较弱,但具有统计学意义(p = 0.003, phi = 0.13)。腹腔镜组患者更常被分类为NACT(78.8%比50.5%)。术中不操作性也较高(29% vs. 14%)。结论:诊断性腹腔镜通过增加NACT的使用和减少非有益手术来影响治疗策略。虽然它不能提高总体的细胞减少率,但它可以实现个性化的治疗计划,特别是在可切除性不明确的患者中,从而潜在地降低手术发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信