A phylogenetic approach to prioritising crop wild relatives in Brassiceae (Brassicaceae) for breeding applications.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Elena Castillo-Lorenzo, Kasper P Hendriks, Flora Gilmour, Amelia Shepherd-Clowes, Freya Cornwell-Davison, Víctor M Rodríguez, Pablo Velasco, Elinor Breman, Juan Viruel
{"title":"A phylogenetic approach to prioritising crop wild relatives in Brassiceae (Brassicaceae) for breeding applications.","authors":"Elena Castillo-Lorenzo, Kasper P Hendriks, Flora Gilmour, Amelia Shepherd-Clowes, Freya Cornwell-Davison, Víctor M Rodríguez, Pablo Velasco, Elinor Breman, Juan Viruel","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcaf201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Crop wild relatives (CWRs) are key resources for enhancing agricultural resilience, providing genetic traits that can improve pest resistance, abiotic stress tolerance, and nutritional composition in domesticated crops. Within the mustard family (Brassicaceae) this is especially significant in the Brassiceae tribe, which includes economically important genera for agriculture such as Brassica and Sinapis. However, while breeding programmes have historically focused on major crops within this tribe, the potential of their wild relatives, particularly for underutilised and minor crops, remains insufficiently explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sequenced 175 accessions from six genera, Brassica, Crambe, Diplotaxis, Eruca, Raphanus and Sinapis, using herbarium, seed, and living collections. We combined those sequences with 30 nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences from GenBank. Libraries were prepared with Angiosperms353 and Brassicaceae bait kits to build a phylogenetic tree to calculate the phylogenetic distances between tips.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We studied the ITS region to build a robust phylogeny for 189 accessions spanning 90 taxa, incorporating newly generated sequences, which included a total of 30 taxa not sequenced before, alongside publicly available sequence data. Phylogenetic distances derived from an ultrametric tree were used to infer cross-compatibility and identify 23 candidate CWRs across the five genera. Our results confirm known relationships based on gene pool classifications of CWRs but also highlight previously overlooked or misclassified taxa that may hold value for crop improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work demonstrates the efficacy of ITS markers for CWR identification and supports their use as a scalable tool for integrating biological collections into modern breeding and conservation strategies. It provides a comprehensive framework for targeting wild genetic diversity in Brassiceae crops and prioritising species for future pre-breeding research.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Crop wild relatives (CWRs) are key resources for enhancing agricultural resilience, providing genetic traits that can improve pest resistance, abiotic stress tolerance, and nutritional composition in domesticated crops. Within the mustard family (Brassicaceae) this is especially significant in the Brassiceae tribe, which includes economically important genera for agriculture such as Brassica and Sinapis. However, while breeding programmes have historically focused on major crops within this tribe, the potential of their wild relatives, particularly for underutilised and minor crops, remains insufficiently explored.

Methods: We sequenced 175 accessions from six genera, Brassica, Crambe, Diplotaxis, Eruca, Raphanus and Sinapis, using herbarium, seed, and living collections. We combined those sequences with 30 nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences from GenBank. Libraries were prepared with Angiosperms353 and Brassicaceae bait kits to build a phylogenetic tree to calculate the phylogenetic distances between tips.

Key results: We studied the ITS region to build a robust phylogeny for 189 accessions spanning 90 taxa, incorporating newly generated sequences, which included a total of 30 taxa not sequenced before, alongside publicly available sequence data. Phylogenetic distances derived from an ultrametric tree were used to infer cross-compatibility and identify 23 candidate CWRs across the five genera. Our results confirm known relationships based on gene pool classifications of CWRs but also highlight previously overlooked or misclassified taxa that may hold value for crop improvement.

Conclusions: This work demonstrates the efficacy of ITS markers for CWR identification and supports their use as a scalable tool for integrating biological collections into modern breeding and conservation strategies. It provides a comprehensive framework for targeting wild genetic diversity in Brassiceae crops and prioritising species for future pre-breeding research.

芸苔科作物野生近缘优先排序的系统发育研究。
背景与目的:作物野生近缘种(Crop wild relatives, CWRs)是增强农业抗灾能力的关键资源,它们提供的遗传性状可以提高驯化作物的抗病虫害能力、非生物胁迫耐受性和营养成分。在芥菜科(芸苔科)中,这在芸苔科部落中尤为重要,其中包括经济上重要的农业属,如芸苔和sinapi。然而,虽然育种计划历来侧重于该部落的主要作物,但其野生近缘种的潜力,特别是未充分利用和次要作物的潜力,仍未得到充分探索。方法:利用植物标本室、种子和活体标本,对芸苔属、芥蓝属、紫芸属、莴苣属和Sinapis 6属175份植物进行了测序。我们将这些序列与来自GenBank的30个核内部转录间隔序列(ITS)结合。利用Angiosperms353和芸苔科(Brassicaceae)毒饵包构建文库,构建系统发育树,计算其尖端之间的系统发育距离。主要结果:我们对ITS区域进行了研究,并将新生成的序列(包括30个未测序的分类群)与公开可用的序列数据结合起来,建立了跨越90个分类群的189个物种的稳健系统发育。系统发育距离来自一个超测量树推断交叉兼容性和确定23候选CWRs跨越5个属。我们的研究结果证实了基于CWRs基因库分类的已知关系,但也突出了以前被忽视或错误分类的分类群,这些分类群可能对作物改良有价值。结论:这项工作证明了ITS标记在CWR鉴定中的有效性,并支持其作为一种可扩展的工具,将生物收集整合到现代育种和保护策略中。它为油菜科作物的野生遗传多样性定位和品种优选提供了一个全面的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信