Soil quality under coca cultivation: Evidence from Peru’s largest coca-growing region challenges degradation narratives and maintains alternative crop opportunities

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hernán Manrique López , Gabriel Velasquez , Edwin Becerra , Adenka Muñoz , Robrecht Van Der Bauwhede , Olivier Honnay
{"title":"Soil quality under coca cultivation: Evidence from Peru’s largest coca-growing region challenges degradation narratives and maintains alternative crop opportunities","authors":"Hernán Manrique López ,&nbsp;Gabriel Velasquez ,&nbsp;Edwin Becerra ,&nbsp;Adenka Muñoz ,&nbsp;Robrecht Van Der Bauwhede ,&nbsp;Olivier Honnay","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While drug control institutions and national governments are increasingly denouncing the negative impacts of coca (<em>Erythroxylum</em> sp.) cultivation on soil degradation, empirical evidence on its effects on soil quality remains limited. Here, we present a first analysis comparing the physicochemical properties of soils that have been under coca cultivation for different time periods, compared to reference soils under rainforest. Using 125 soil samples collected in 2023 in <em>Valle de los Ríos Apurímac, Ene y Mantaro</em> (VRAEM), we assessed key soil properties at the surface level (0–20 cm). Compared to reference rainforest soils, soil pH was slightly higher (+0.3–0.5 pH units) in recently (&lt; 10 years) cultivated coca fields likely related to liming practices and increased base cation cycling. Electrical conductivity was lower in all cultivated fields, and total nitrogen was only slightly lower in fields under cultivation for 11–20 years. Promisingly, soil degradation under coca cultivation could not be evidenced in terms of bulk density, cation exchange capacity, soil organic carbon concentration and cumulative carbon stock (0–60 cm depth), phosphorus nor exchangeable aluminum. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the effects of coca cultivation on soil degradation are not as severe as presumed, challenging prevailing narratives on its environmental impact and indicating that crop substitution programs could also mitigate these issues using agro-ecological approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"396 ","pages":"Article 109958"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925004906","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While drug control institutions and national governments are increasingly denouncing the negative impacts of coca (Erythroxylum sp.) cultivation on soil degradation, empirical evidence on its effects on soil quality remains limited. Here, we present a first analysis comparing the physicochemical properties of soils that have been under coca cultivation for different time periods, compared to reference soils under rainforest. Using 125 soil samples collected in 2023 in Valle de los Ríos Apurímac, Ene y Mantaro (VRAEM), we assessed key soil properties at the surface level (0–20 cm). Compared to reference rainforest soils, soil pH was slightly higher (+0.3–0.5 pH units) in recently (< 10 years) cultivated coca fields likely related to liming practices and increased base cation cycling. Electrical conductivity was lower in all cultivated fields, and total nitrogen was only slightly lower in fields under cultivation for 11–20 years. Promisingly, soil degradation under coca cultivation could not be evidenced in terms of bulk density, cation exchange capacity, soil organic carbon concentration and cumulative carbon stock (0–60 cm depth), phosphorus nor exchangeable aluminum. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the effects of coca cultivation on soil degradation are not as severe as presumed, challenging prevailing narratives on its environmental impact and indicating that crop substitution programs could also mitigate these issues using agro-ecological approaches.
古柯种植下的土壤质量:来自秘鲁最大古柯种植区的证据挑战了退化的说法,并保持了替代作物的机会
虽然药物管制机构和各国政府越来越多地谴责古柯种植对土壤退化的负面影响,但关于其对土壤质量影响的经验证据仍然有限。在这里,我们提出了第一个分析,比较了不同时期种植古柯的土壤的物理化学性质,与热带雨林下的参考土壤相比。利用2023年在埃内曼塔罗山谷Ríos Apurímac (VRAEM)收集的125个土壤样本,我们评估了地表(0-20 cm)的关键土壤特性。与参考雨林土壤相比,最近(<; 10年)种植古柯田的土壤pH值略高(+ 0.3-0.5 pH单位),可能与石灰化做法和碱阳离子循环增加有关。电导率在所有耕地中均较低,全氮在11 ~ 20年的耕地中仅略低。有希望的是,古柯种植下的土壤退化不能在容重、阳离子交换容量、土壤有机碳浓度和累积碳储量(0-60 cm深度)、磷和交换性铝方面得到证明。总之,研究结果表明,古柯种植对土壤退化的影响并不像人们想象的那么严重,这挑战了有关古柯种植对环境影响的普遍说法,并表明作物替代计划也可以利用农业生态方法缓解这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信