Energy, exergy, environmental, and exergoeconomic (4E) analysis of a fossil fuel power plant with carbon capture unit for a sustainable future

IF 6.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tahir Abdul Hussain Ratlamwala , Khurram Kamal , Hafsa Javed , Sheikh Muhammad Ali Haider , Muhammad Abid , Sayem Zafar , Mohammed Alkahtani
{"title":"Energy, exergy, environmental, and exergoeconomic (4E) analysis of a fossil fuel power plant with carbon capture unit for a sustainable future","authors":"Tahir Abdul Hussain Ratlamwala ,&nbsp;Khurram Kamal ,&nbsp;Hafsa Javed ,&nbsp;Sheikh Muhammad Ali Haider ,&nbsp;Muhammad Abid ,&nbsp;Sayem Zafar ,&nbsp;Mohammed Alkahtani","doi":"10.1016/j.aej.2025.08.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The contribution of fossil fuels to the detrimental trend of global warming is undeniably real. Given the energy sector's heavy reliance on fossil fuels, it is crucial to take necessary actions to mitigate their adverse environmental impact. This study proposes a fossil fuel (natural gas) power plant integrated with a carbon capture unit (CCU) to minimize the associated environmental impacts. A thorough analysis of the system's energy, exergy, environmental, and exergoeconomic aspects (4E) reveals valuable insights into the proposed design. This CCU system captures CO<sub>2</sub> from the combined cycle power plant (CCPP) exhaust and employs it as a working fluid in the Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> Power Cycle. The system generates 42.4 MW of power, 25.3 MJ/s of heat energy for hot water production, 49.6 MJ/s of heat energy for water desalination, 192.3 kJ/s for space cooling, and medium-pressure (MP) steam with a heat energy of 24.9 MJ/s. The system achieves 50 % energy efficiency and 54 % exergy efficiency, capturing 190.37 kilo metric tons of CO<sub>2</sub> per year. Additionally, the study examines the impact of variations in inputs, including air-fuel ratio, fuel quantity, ambient temperature, and steam temperature at the Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) outlet, on system efficiencies. 4E analysis reveals that the proposed system is more beneficial than simple power plants with no carbon capture units.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7484,"journal":{"name":"alexandria engineering journal","volume":"130 ","pages":"Pages 68-84"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria engineering journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016825009536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contribution of fossil fuels to the detrimental trend of global warming is undeniably real. Given the energy sector's heavy reliance on fossil fuels, it is crucial to take necessary actions to mitigate their adverse environmental impact. This study proposes a fossil fuel (natural gas) power plant integrated with a carbon capture unit (CCU) to minimize the associated environmental impacts. A thorough analysis of the system's energy, exergy, environmental, and exergoeconomic aspects (4E) reveals valuable insights into the proposed design. This CCU system captures CO2 from the combined cycle power plant (CCPP) exhaust and employs it as a working fluid in the Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle. The system generates 42.4 MW of power, 25.3 MJ/s of heat energy for hot water production, 49.6 MJ/s of heat energy for water desalination, 192.3 kJ/s for space cooling, and medium-pressure (MP) steam with a heat energy of 24.9 MJ/s. The system achieves 50 % energy efficiency and 54 % exergy efficiency, capturing 190.37 kilo metric tons of CO2 per year. Additionally, the study examines the impact of variations in inputs, including air-fuel ratio, fuel quantity, ambient temperature, and steam temperature at the Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) outlet, on system efficiencies. 4E analysis reveals that the proposed system is more beneficial than simple power plants with no carbon capture units.
能源、能源、环境和能源经济(4E)分析的化石燃料发电厂与碳捕获装置的可持续未来
化石燃料对全球变暖这一有害趋势的贡献是不可否认的。鉴于能源部门对化石燃料的严重依赖,采取必要行动减轻其对环境的不利影响至关重要。本研究建议将化石燃料(天然气)发电厂与碳捕集装置(CCU)相结合,以尽量减少相关的环境影响。对系统的能源、能源、环境和能源经济方面(4E)的全面分析揭示了对拟议设计的有价值的见解。该CCU系统从联合循环发电厂(CCPP)废气中捕获二氧化碳,并将其用作超临界二氧化碳动力循环的工作流体。系统发电功率42.4 MW,产热水热能25.3 MJ/s,海水淡化热能49.6 MJ/s,空间冷却热能192.3 kJ/s,中压蒸汽热能24.9 MJ/s。该系统实现了50% %的能源效率和54% %的能源效率,每年捕获190.37千克公吨的二氧化碳。此外,该研究还考察了输入变量的影响,包括空燃比、燃料量、环境温度和热回收蒸汽发生器(HRSG)出口的蒸汽温度,对系统效率的影响。4E分析显示,拟议的系统比没有碳捕获装置的简单发电厂更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
alexandria engineering journal
alexandria engineering journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
1015
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Alexandria Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publishing high quality papers in the field of engineering and applied science. Alexandria Engineering Journal is cited in the Engineering Information Services (EIS) and the Chemical Abstracts (CA). The papers published in Alexandria Engineering Journal are grouped into five sections, according to the following classification: • Mechanical, Production, Marine and Textile Engineering • Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering • Civil and Architecture Engineering • Chemical Engineering and Applied Sciences • Environmental Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信