Towards a transdiagnostic approach to psychopathology in the postpartum period

IF 12.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jessilyn M. Froelich, Emily D. Gerstein
{"title":"Towards a transdiagnostic approach to psychopathology in the postpartum period","authors":"Jessilyn M. Froelich,&nbsp;Emily D. Gerstein","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Psychopathology research and clinical practice have historically relied on traditional diagnostic approaches, though there is a growing body of evidence suggesting these methods are likely outdated and are not suited for capturing the nuance and complexity of mental health symptomatology. Transdiagnostic approaches to psychopathology have been proposed as an alternative to traditional nosology, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases and their corresponding versions. The postpartum period may be a time when transdiagnostic approaches could be useful, as it has both normative and maladaptive psychological challenges with clear overlapping risk, protective, and maintenance factors related to its psychopathology. The benefits of taking a transdiagnostic approach in the postpartum period are vast – examining postpartum psychopathology transdiagnostically can help identify common thematic elements experienced by new mothers, thus leading to improved screening, further assessment, and targeted treatment. This paper reviews the current diagnostic approaches to postpartum psychopathology, the benefits of a transdiagnostic approach in the postpartum period, relevant biopsychosocial factors, and proposes ways to incorporate this transdiagnostic approach in a way that works to benefit new mothers. Additionally, potential challenges and barriers to implementation are explored.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102646"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825001138","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychopathology research and clinical practice have historically relied on traditional diagnostic approaches, though there is a growing body of evidence suggesting these methods are likely outdated and are not suited for capturing the nuance and complexity of mental health symptomatology. Transdiagnostic approaches to psychopathology have been proposed as an alternative to traditional nosology, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases and their corresponding versions. The postpartum period may be a time when transdiagnostic approaches could be useful, as it has both normative and maladaptive psychological challenges with clear overlapping risk, protective, and maintenance factors related to its psychopathology. The benefits of taking a transdiagnostic approach in the postpartum period are vast – examining postpartum psychopathology transdiagnostically can help identify common thematic elements experienced by new mothers, thus leading to improved screening, further assessment, and targeted treatment. This paper reviews the current diagnostic approaches to postpartum psychopathology, the benefits of a transdiagnostic approach in the postpartum period, relevant biopsychosocial factors, and proposes ways to incorporate this transdiagnostic approach in a way that works to benefit new mothers. Additionally, potential challenges and barriers to implementation are explored.
产后精神病理的跨诊断方法
精神病理学研究和临床实践历来依赖于传统的诊断方法,尽管越来越多的证据表明,这些方法可能已经过时,不适合捕捉精神健康症状学的细微差别和复杂性。精神病理学的跨诊断方法已被提议作为传统分类学的替代方法,如《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》或《国际疾病分类》及其相应版本。产后可能是一个跨诊断方法有用的时期,因为它既有规范性的心理挑战,也有适应不良的心理挑战,与精神病理相关的风险、保护和维持因素明显重叠。在产后期间采用跨诊断方法的好处是巨大的-跨诊断检查产后精神病理可以帮助确定新妈妈经历的共同主题因素,从而改善筛查,进一步评估和有针对性的治疗。本文回顾了目前产后精神病理学的诊断方法,产后跨诊断方法的益处,相关的生物心理社会因素,并提出了将这种跨诊断方法纳入新母亲的方法。此外,还探讨了实施的潜在挑战和障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信