{"title":"Towards a transdiagnostic approach to psychopathology in the postpartum period","authors":"Jessilyn M. Froelich, Emily D. Gerstein","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Psychopathology research and clinical practice have historically relied on traditional diagnostic approaches, though there is a growing body of evidence suggesting these methods are likely outdated and are not suited for capturing the nuance and complexity of mental health symptomatology. Transdiagnostic approaches to psychopathology have been proposed as an alternative to traditional nosology, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases and their corresponding versions. The postpartum period may be a time when transdiagnostic approaches could be useful, as it has both normative and maladaptive psychological challenges with clear overlapping risk, protective, and maintenance factors related to its psychopathology. The benefits of taking a transdiagnostic approach in the postpartum period are vast – examining postpartum psychopathology transdiagnostically can help identify common thematic elements experienced by new mothers, thus leading to improved screening, further assessment, and targeted treatment. This paper reviews the current diagnostic approaches to postpartum psychopathology, the benefits of a transdiagnostic approach in the postpartum period, relevant biopsychosocial factors, and proposes ways to incorporate this transdiagnostic approach in a way that works to benefit new mothers. Additionally, potential challenges and barriers to implementation are explored.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102646"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825001138","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Psychopathology research and clinical practice have historically relied on traditional diagnostic approaches, though there is a growing body of evidence suggesting these methods are likely outdated and are not suited for capturing the nuance and complexity of mental health symptomatology. Transdiagnostic approaches to psychopathology have been proposed as an alternative to traditional nosology, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases and their corresponding versions. The postpartum period may be a time when transdiagnostic approaches could be useful, as it has both normative and maladaptive psychological challenges with clear overlapping risk, protective, and maintenance factors related to its psychopathology. The benefits of taking a transdiagnostic approach in the postpartum period are vast – examining postpartum psychopathology transdiagnostically can help identify common thematic elements experienced by new mothers, thus leading to improved screening, further assessment, and targeted treatment. This paper reviews the current diagnostic approaches to postpartum psychopathology, the benefits of a transdiagnostic approach in the postpartum period, relevant biopsychosocial factors, and proposes ways to incorporate this transdiagnostic approach in a way that works to benefit new mothers. Additionally, potential challenges and barriers to implementation are explored.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology.
While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.