Canadian correctional program officers facilitating programming for sex offenders: The stickiness of stigma

Q1 Social Sciences
Rosemary Ricciardelli , Dale Spencer , Micheal P. Taylor
{"title":"Canadian correctional program officers facilitating programming for sex offenders: The stickiness of stigma","authors":"Rosemary Ricciardelli ,&nbsp;Dale Spencer ,&nbsp;Micheal P. Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The stigma of being convicted (or suspected) of sex–related offenses is long recognized, resulting in people being viewed as being the most abhorrent of offenders. Sex offenders (SOs) have been studied, as well as the parole and correctional officers who work with them. Yet, despite their centralized role in prisoner rehabilitation, correctional program officers (CPOs) facilitating programs to SOs have yet to be examined in relation to their interpretations of SOs and of prison culture around SOs. Drawing on interviews with 12 CPOs who have delivered SO-focused programming to groups of SOs exclusively, we unpack the stigma and label of SOs in institutions and the community, the perceived implications of stigmatization on SO and CPOs, and on their ability to complete programs safely and successfully. Our findings reveal i) SOs remain stigmatized with repercussion for reintegration opportunities; ii) SOs remain at the bottom of the prisoner hierarchy; iii) SOs require support to physically attend programs; and iv) the SO stigma sticks to people facilitating sex offender programs. Findings are discussed in relation to stigma theories but also considerations for program delivery and CPO education and wellness are put forth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36925,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Synergy","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100639"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Synergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X25000683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The stigma of being convicted (or suspected) of sex–related offenses is long recognized, resulting in people being viewed as being the most abhorrent of offenders. Sex offenders (SOs) have been studied, as well as the parole and correctional officers who work with them. Yet, despite their centralized role in prisoner rehabilitation, correctional program officers (CPOs) facilitating programs to SOs have yet to be examined in relation to their interpretations of SOs and of prison culture around SOs. Drawing on interviews with 12 CPOs who have delivered SO-focused programming to groups of SOs exclusively, we unpack the stigma and label of SOs in institutions and the community, the perceived implications of stigmatization on SO and CPOs, and on their ability to complete programs safely and successfully. Our findings reveal i) SOs remain stigmatized with repercussion for reintegration opportunities; ii) SOs remain at the bottom of the prisoner hierarchy; iii) SOs require support to physically attend programs; and iv) the SO stigma sticks to people facilitating sex offender programs. Findings are discussed in relation to stigma theories but also considerations for program delivery and CPO education and wellness are put forth.
加拿大惩教计划官员促进性犯罪者的规划:污名的粘性
长期以来,被判(或涉嫌)性犯罪是一种耻辱,这导致人们被视为最可恶的罪犯。性犯罪者(so),以及与他们一起工作的假释和惩教官员都被研究过。然而,尽管惩教项目官员(CPOs)在囚犯康复中发挥着中心作用,但他们对社会主义分子和围绕社会主义分子的监狱文化的解释尚未得到审查。通过对12位专门为社会组织提供以社会组织为中心的节目的社会组织的采访,我们揭示了社会组织在机构和社区中的耻辱和标签,耻辱对社会组织和社会组织的感知影响,以及他们安全成功地完成项目的能力。我们的研究结果表明,i)社会主义组织仍然被污名化,对重返社会的机会产生影响;ii) so仍然处于囚犯层级的最底层;iii) SOs需要支持才能参加项目;iv)为性犯罪者项目提供便利的人会背负SO的污名。研究结果讨论了相关的污名理论,但也考虑到项目交付和CPO教育和健康提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信