Neurofilament Light Chain and Differentiation of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia From Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Abstract

Importance Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), the most common subtype of FTD, is a leading form of early-onset dementia worldwide. Accurate and timely diagnosis of bvFTD is frequently delayed due to symptoms overlapping with common psychiatric disorders, and interest has increased in identifying biomarkers that may aid in differentiating bvFTD from psychiatric disorders. Objective To summarize and critically review studies examining whether neurofilament light chain (NfL) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or blood is a viable aid in the differential diagnosis of bvFTD vs psychiatric disorders. Evidence Review A systematic review was conducted, searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Collaborative according to Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines. Eligible articles included cohorts of patients with bvFTD and psychiatric disorders ascertained using validated methods and conducted analyses to evaluate NfL from CSF and/or blood in distinguishing bvFTD from psychiatric disorders. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Findings A total of 3828 titles and abstracts and 434 full-text articles were reviewed, yielding 12 articles meeting eligibility criteria. The studies included 694 unique patients with bvFTD and 1594 unique patients with a range of psychiatric disorders. Four studies measured NfL levels in CSF, 6 in blood, and 2 in both. Levels of NfL in CSF and blood were significantly higher among patients with bvFTD than patients with psychiatric disorders. In receiving operator characteristic curve analyses, the area under the curve (AUC) for NfL in CSF for bvFTD vs psychiatric disorders ranged from 0.86 to 0.95 (sensitivities: 63%-96%, specificities: 81%-100%). The AUCs for NfL in blood ranged from 0.79 to 0.98 (sensitivities: 65%-100%, specificities: 69%-96%). Conclusions and Relevance The findings in this systematic review indicate that NfL may help supplement clinical diagnostic evaluations in differentiating bvFTD from psychiatric disorder diagnoses. Considering the limitations of the existing literature, future studies should prospectively recruit patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms, quantify symptom severity, obtain NfL levels in real-time using clinically available assays, consider the potential impact of patient age on diagnostic accuracy, establish clinically relevant cutoffs, and correlate NfL with autopsy-confirmed brain pathology.