Sari Winham, Michael LeGal, Jennifer Ernst, Ashley Foldes, Jasmine Cura, Courtney Fried
{"title":"Impact of Prone Positioning With Continuous Enteral Nutrition on Aspiration Pneumonia in Non-Intubated Patients With COVID-19.","authors":"Sari Winham, Michael LeGal, Jennifer Ernst, Ashley Foldes, Jasmine Cura, Courtney Fried","doi":"10.1177/10547738251368972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a triad of therapies for patients: oxygen, nutrition, and patient positioning. In the progressive care units, patients were placed in a prone position while receiving continuous enteral nutrition (EN) to optimize healing and oxygenation. The study aimed to identify the rate of aspiration pneumonia in non-ventilated COVID-19 patients placed in a prone position while receiving continuous EN. This was a single-group, descriptive retrospective study. The study was conducted at a two-time Magnet<sup>®</sup> designated academic medical and health science center in the Southwestern United States. The sample included 97 electronic health records (EHRs) of patients diagnosed with COVID-19, receiving continuous EN, and placed in a prone position from March 15, 2020 to June 1, 2022. Data were extracted from EHRs using ICD-10 codes, including patient demographics, EN frequency, gastric tube placement, patient positioning, and incidence of aspiration pneumonia. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used. The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and Fisher's exact test were employed for comparisons. Statistical significance was set at <i>p</i> ≤ .05. Out of 97 patients, 8 (8.25%) developed aspiration pneumonia. The majority of patients (75%) had post-pyloric feeding tubes. All patients who developed aspiration pneumonia had post-pyloric tubes. Placing COVID-19 patients in a prone position while receiving continuous EN may be a safe practice. Diligent nursing assessment is crucial to minimize aspiration risk and optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"393-400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738251368972","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a triad of therapies for patients: oxygen, nutrition, and patient positioning. In the progressive care units, patients were placed in a prone position while receiving continuous enteral nutrition (EN) to optimize healing and oxygenation. The study aimed to identify the rate of aspiration pneumonia in non-ventilated COVID-19 patients placed in a prone position while receiving continuous EN. This was a single-group, descriptive retrospective study. The study was conducted at a two-time Magnet® designated academic medical and health science center in the Southwestern United States. The sample included 97 electronic health records (EHRs) of patients diagnosed with COVID-19, receiving continuous EN, and placed in a prone position from March 15, 2020 to June 1, 2022. Data were extracted from EHRs using ICD-10 codes, including patient demographics, EN frequency, gastric tube placement, patient positioning, and incidence of aspiration pneumonia. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used. The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and Fisher's exact test were employed for comparisons. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ .05. Out of 97 patients, 8 (8.25%) developed aspiration pneumonia. The majority of patients (75%) had post-pyloric feeding tubes. All patients who developed aspiration pneumonia had post-pyloric tubes. Placing COVID-19 patients in a prone position while receiving continuous EN may be a safe practice. Diligent nursing assessment is crucial to minimize aspiration risk and optimize patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).