Addressing the Increasing Rate of Caesarean Sections in an Australian Healthcare System: A Systems Science Approach to Identify Stakeholder Perspectives.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Siobhan O'Halloran, Susan Perlen, Anna Chapman, Sominsky Luba, Samantha L Dawson, Rachael Cusworth, Laura Alston, Vidanka Vasilevski, Linda Sweet, Peter Vuillermin, Alison M Hutchinson
{"title":"Addressing the Increasing Rate of Caesarean Sections in an Australian Healthcare System: A Systems Science Approach to Identify Stakeholder Perspectives.","authors":"Siobhan O'Halloran, Susan Perlen, Anna Chapman, Sominsky Luba, Samantha L Dawson, Rachael Cusworth, Laura Alston, Vidanka Vasilevski, Linda Sweet, Peter Vuillermin, Alison M Hutchinson","doi":"10.1111/nhs.70220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing globally. We aimed to understand stakeholders' perspectives on factors driving CS in pregnancy care to inform areas for intervention. Stakeholders from five health services participated in three Group Model Building workshops to identify the drivers of CS and intervention opportunities. A Causal Loop Diagram was developed to identify priority action areas. Workshop transcripts were thematically analyzed to understand the factors influencing CS rates and to identify areas for interventions to improve CS decision-making. Participants identified 29 drivers that were grouped into four priority areas for action: mothers' health and confidence, clinicians providing care, clinical monitoring and intervention, and health system issues. Five major themes emerged from the transcripts: health system issues, maternal factors, clinical factors, clinical management, and guidelines and adherence. Intervention ideas included: feedback data use across health services, improving the quality of data, and modifying data entry prompts. The factors driving CS rates related to clinicians, maternal service users, the health system, and the health service. A standardized audit and feedback tool to assess, monitor, and compare CS rates within health systems may address CS overuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":49730,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Health Sciences","volume":"27 3","pages":"e70220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.70220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing globally. We aimed to understand stakeholders' perspectives on factors driving CS in pregnancy care to inform areas for intervention. Stakeholders from five health services participated in three Group Model Building workshops to identify the drivers of CS and intervention opportunities. A Causal Loop Diagram was developed to identify priority action areas. Workshop transcripts were thematically analyzed to understand the factors influencing CS rates and to identify areas for interventions to improve CS decision-making. Participants identified 29 drivers that were grouped into four priority areas for action: mothers' health and confidence, clinicians providing care, clinical monitoring and intervention, and health system issues. Five major themes emerged from the transcripts: health system issues, maternal factors, clinical factors, clinical management, and guidelines and adherence. Intervention ideas included: feedback data use across health services, improving the quality of data, and modifying data entry prompts. The factors driving CS rates related to clinicians, maternal service users, the health system, and the health service. A standardized audit and feedback tool to assess, monitor, and compare CS rates within health systems may address CS overuse.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

解决日益增长的剖腹产率在澳大利亚医疗保健系统:系统科学的方法来确定利益相关者的观点。
全球剖宫产率正在上升。我们的目的是了解利益相关者对孕期护理中CS驱动因素的看法,为干预领域提供信息。来自五个保健服务机构的利益攸关方参加了三个小组模型构建讲习班,以确定保健服务的驱动因素和干预机会。制定了因果循环图,以确定优先行动领域。对研讨会记录进行主题分析,以了解影响CS率的因素,并确定干预措施以改善CS决策的领域。与会者确定了29个驱动因素,将其分为四个优先行动领域:母亲的健康和信心、提供护理的临床医生、临床监测和干预以及卫生系统问题。记录中出现了五个主要主题:卫生系统问题、孕产妇因素、临床因素、临床管理以及指南和依从性。干预想法包括:在卫生服务中使用反馈数据、提高数据质量和修改数据输入提示。影响CS率的因素与临床医生、孕产妇服务使用者、卫生系统和卫生服务有关。一种标准化的审计和反馈工具来评估、监测和比较卫生系统内CS的比率,可能会解决CS的过度使用问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NHS has a multidisciplinary focus and broad scope and a particular focus on the translation of research into clinical practice, inter-disciplinary and multidisciplinary work, primary health care, health promotion, health education, management of communicable and non-communicable diseases, implementation of technological innovations and inclusive multicultural approaches to health services and care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信