Causal Association between Erectile Dysfunction with Urate Levels and Gout: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Qingqiang Gao, Liang He, Jian Zhang, Leilei Zhu
{"title":"Causal Association between Erectile Dysfunction with Urate Levels and Gout: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.","authors":"Qingqiang Gao, Liang He, Jian Zhang, Leilei Zhu","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257807.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A plethora of studies have demonstrated that the level of uric acid (UA) and gout are the risk factors for erectile dysfunction (ED). However, the causal effect of UA level and gout on ED is still unclear. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study aims to examine the bidirectional causality between ED and UA levels as well as gout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a bidirectional MR analysis using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to investigate the causal association between ED and UA levels as well as gout. We meticulously selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on rigorous criteria as instrumental variables. Four two-sample MR analysis methods, including inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode, were applied in our study. Furthermore, several sensitivity analyses including Cochrane's Q-test, MR-Egger intercept test, the Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) global test, and leave-one-out analysis were performed to assess heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included one dataset related to UA levels (GWAS meta-analysis conducted by Tin <i>et al</i>.), two datasets related to gout (ukb-b-12765 and finn-R9-M13_GOUT), and one dataset related to ED (GWAS meta-analysis conducted by Bovijn <i>et al</i>.). MR results of the IVW method indicated that UA levels and gout were not causally associated with ED in three UA levels/gout-related datasets (IVW, odds ratios (OR): 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92-1.07, <i>p</i> = 0.834; 3.20, 0.17-61.69, 0.441; 1.03, 0.97-1.09, 0.372, respectively). The reverse MR revealed no evidence of a causal effect of ED on UA levels or gout according to the IVW method (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96-1.02, <i>p</i>: 0.568; 1.00, 1.00-1.00, 0.555; 0.97, 0.89-1.05, 0.425, respectively). The results of other MR analysis methods were consistent with IVW. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis suggested that the results were robust, with no pleiotropy or heterogeneity detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our MR study supports no bidirectional causal effect of UA level or gout on ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"78 7","pages":"902-908"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257807.119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A plethora of studies have demonstrated that the level of uric acid (UA) and gout are the risk factors for erectile dysfunction (ED). However, the causal effect of UA level and gout on ED is still unclear. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study aims to examine the bidirectional causality between ED and UA levels as well as gout.

Methods: We performed a bidirectional MR analysis using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to investigate the causal association between ED and UA levels as well as gout. We meticulously selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on rigorous criteria as instrumental variables. Four two-sample MR analysis methods, including inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode, were applied in our study. Furthermore, several sensitivity analyses including Cochrane's Q-test, MR-Egger intercept test, the Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) global test, and leave-one-out analysis were performed to assess heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and stability.

Results: The study included one dataset related to UA levels (GWAS meta-analysis conducted by Tin et al.), two datasets related to gout (ukb-b-12765 and finn-R9-M13_GOUT), and one dataset related to ED (GWAS meta-analysis conducted by Bovijn et al.). MR results of the IVW method indicated that UA levels and gout were not causally associated with ED in three UA levels/gout-related datasets (IVW, odds ratios (OR): 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92-1.07, p = 0.834; 3.20, 0.17-61.69, 0.441; 1.03, 0.97-1.09, 0.372, respectively). The reverse MR revealed no evidence of a causal effect of ED on UA levels or gout according to the IVW method (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96-1.02, p: 0.568; 1.00, 1.00-1.00, 0.555; 0.97, 0.89-1.05, 0.425, respectively). The results of other MR analysis methods were consistent with IVW. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis suggested that the results were robust, with no pleiotropy or heterogeneity detected.

Conclusions: Our MR study supports no bidirectional causal effect of UA level or gout on ED.

勃起功能障碍与尿酸水平和痛风之间的因果关系:一项双样本孟德尔随机研究。
背景:大量研究表明,尿酸(UA)和痛风水平是勃起功能障碍(ED)的危险因素。然而,UA水平与痛风对ED的因果关系尚不清楚。这项孟德尔随机化(MR)研究旨在检查ED和UA水平以及痛风之间的双向因果关系。方法:我们使用全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的汇总统计数据进行双向MR分析,以调查ED和UA水平以及痛风之间的因果关系。我们根据严格的标准精心选择单核苷酸多态性(snp)作为工具变量。本研究采用反方差加权(IVW)、MR- egger、加权中位数和加权模式四种双样本MR分析方法。此外,我们还进行了多项敏感性分析,包括Cochrane’s q检验、MR-Egger截距检验、孟德尔随机化多效性残差和异常值(MR-PRESSO)全球检验和留一分析,以评估异质性、水平多效性和稳定性。结果:该研究包括一个与UA水平相关的数据集(Tin等人进行的GWAS荟萃分析),两个与痛风相关的数据集(ukb-b-12765和fin - r9 - m13_gout),以及一个与ED相关的数据集(Bovijn等人进行的GWAS荟萃分析)。IVW方法的MR结果显示,在三个UA水平/痛风相关数据集中,UA水平和痛风与ED无因果关系(IVW,优势比(OR): 0.99, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.92-1.07, p = 0.834;3.20, 0.17-61.69, 0.441;分别为1.03、0.97 ~ 1.09、0.372)。根据IVW方法,反向MR显示ED对UA水平或痛风没有因果影响的证据(or: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96-1.02, p: 0.568; 1.00, 1.00-1.00, 0.555; 0.97, 0.89-1.05, 0.425)。其他MR分析方法的结果与IVW一致。此外,敏感性分析表明,结果是稳健的,没有检测到多效性或异质性。结论:我们的MR研究支持UA水平或痛风对ED没有双向因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信