Efficacy and Safety of Combination Tamsulosin and Dutasteride versus Tamsulosin Monotherapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hao Yu, Hongying Chen, Xuejun Wang, Jiakuan Li, Xiaomei Shen, Xuerong Ye
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Combination Tamsulosin and Dutasteride versus Tamsulosin Monotherapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hao Yu, Hongying Chen, Xuejun Wang, Jiakuan Li, Xiaomei Shen, Xuerong Ye","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257807.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and drug-related adverse events (AEs) of the combination of tamsulosin and dutasteride versus tamsulosin monotherapy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant articles published in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane from 2004 to 2024 were searched and downloaded. These studies were screened following pre-established inclusion criteria, and data were extracted. Review Manager software was used for methodological quality assessment of randomised controlled trials and statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies containing 8793 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Combined dutasteride and tamsulosin more significantly improved symptoms (mean difference (MD): -1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.27, -0.84; <i>p</i> < 0.001), increased maximum urine flow (MD: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.91; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and decreased prostate volume (MD: -14.42; 95% CI: -20.62, -8.22; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and prostate-specific antigen (MD: -2.32; 95% CI: -3.03, -1.61; <i>p</i> < 0.001) in patients with BPH than tamsulosin monotherapy. The combined drug also reduced the negative effect on patients' living status (MD: -0.68; 95% CI: -1.02, -0.33; <i>p</i> < 0.001), acute urinary retention or BPH-related surgeries (odds ratio (OR): 0.33; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.44; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and clinical progression of BPH (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.61; <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin significantly increased the incidence of drug-related AEs (OR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.67, 2.73; <i>p</i> < 0.001) in patients with BPH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with BPH, the combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin is a beneficial treatment option, but the impact on drug-related AEs events needs to be considered on an individual basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"78 7","pages":"866-876"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257807.115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and drug-related adverse events (AEs) of the combination of tamsulosin and dutasteride versus tamsulosin monotherapy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods: Relevant articles published in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane from 2004 to 2024 were searched and downloaded. These studies were screened following pre-established inclusion criteria, and data were extracted. Review Manager software was used for methodological quality assessment of randomised controlled trials and statistical analysis.

Results: Eight studies containing 8793 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Combined dutasteride and tamsulosin more significantly improved symptoms (mean difference (MD): -1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.27, -0.84; p < 0.001), increased maximum urine flow (MD: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.91; p < 0.001) and decreased prostate volume (MD: -14.42; 95% CI: -20.62, -8.22; p < 0.001) and prostate-specific antigen (MD: -2.32; 95% CI: -3.03, -1.61; p < 0.001) in patients with BPH than tamsulosin monotherapy. The combined drug also reduced the negative effect on patients' living status (MD: -0.68; 95% CI: -1.02, -0.33; p < 0.001), acute urinary retention or BPH-related surgeries (odds ratio (OR): 0.33; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.44; p < 0.001) and clinical progression of BPH (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.61; p < 0.001). However, the combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin significantly increased the incidence of drug-related AEs (OR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.67, 2.73; p < 0.001) in patients with BPH.

Conclusions: In patients with BPH, the combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin is a beneficial treatment option, but the impact on drug-related AEs events needs to be considered on an individual basis.

坦索罗辛联合度他雄胺与坦索罗辛单药治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
背景:我们进行了一项荟萃分析,比较坦索罗新联合度他雄胺与坦索罗新单药治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的疗效和药物相关不良事件(ae)。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane 2004 - 2024年发表的相关文章并下载。这些研究按照预先建立的纳入标准进行筛选,并提取数据。采用Review Manager软件对随机对照试验进行方法学质量评价和统计分析。结果:8项研究共8793例患者被纳入meta分析。杜他雄胺联合坦索罗辛更显著地改善了症状(平均差异(MD): -1.55;95%置信区间(CI): -2.27, -0.84;与坦索罗辛单药治疗相比,BPH患者最大尿流量(MD: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.91, p < 0.001)增加,前列腺体积(MD: -14.42, 95% CI: -20.62, -8.22, p < 0.001)和前列腺特异性抗原(MD: -2.32, 95% CI: -3.03, -1.61, p < 0.001)减少。联合用药还降低了患者生活状态(MD: -0.68; 95% CI: -1.02, -0.33; p < 0.001)、急性尿潴留或bph相关手术的负面影响(优势比(or): 0.33;95% ci: 0.25, 0.44;p < 0.001)和BPH的临床进展(OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.61; p < 0.001)。然而,dutasteride联合tamsulosin显著增加了BPH患者药物相关ae的发生率(OR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.67, 2.73; p < 0.001)。结论:对于BPH患者,度他雄胺联合坦索罗辛是一种有益的治疗选择,但对药物相关不良事件的影响需要根据个人情况进行考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信