Utilizing the Human Animal Bond to Promote Preventive Care Engagement in Underserved Communities: A Descriptive Study of 2 U.S. One Health Clinics.

IF 2.5 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Kimberly Aguirre Siliezar, Sonny Patel, Reema Chande, Alaina Joiner, MacKenzie C Hoover, Mary W Mathis, Janet Hendrickson, Julio Siliezar, Kristin Jankowski
{"title":"Utilizing the Human Animal Bond to Promote Preventive Care Engagement in Underserved Communities: A Descriptive Study of 2 U.S. One Health Clinics.","authors":"Kimberly Aguirre Siliezar, Sonny Patel, Reema Chande, Alaina Joiner, MacKenzie C Hoover, Mary W Mathis, Janet Hendrickson, Julio Siliezar, Kristin Jankowski","doi":"10.1177/21501319251369270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>The purpose of this descriptive study was to strengthen understanding of the human-animal bond and the impact of One Health Clinics (OHCs) on the communities they serve. We aimed to assess how joint access to veterinary care and human health services enables community members to engage with healthcare for themselves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals attending 2 OHCs in the United States were surveyed to gain insight into reasons for attending OHCs, attitudes on the human-animal bond, healthcare access and utilization, and pet owner satisfaction and trust toward medical and veterinary professionals. Both clinics operated in areas with limited medical and veterinary healthcare access, but varied in clinic structure and availability of human healthcare volunteers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 175 surveys were analyzed. Most participants attended primarily for veterinary services (Clinic A: 91%, Clinic B: 75%). However, a significantly higher proportion of Clinic B participants received health screenings (91% vs 32%, <i>P</i> < .0001), learned new health information (48% vs 31%, <i>P</i> = .0129), and were provided with follow-up health resources (84% vs 51%, <i>P</i> = .000007). Across both sites, the majority expressed high trust in medical and veterinary providers (Clinic A: 84%-95%, Clinic B: 90%-98%) and reported high satisfaction with the care received. Most participants considered their pets vital family members (Clinic A: 81%, Clinic B: 93%), and many credited their pets with supporting physical activity and reducing feelings of depression and loneliness. Importantly, a majority of respondents at both clinics indicated they were more likely to seek healthcare for themselves if veterinary services were also available (Clinic A: 56%, Clinic B: 72%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that OHCs have the potential to enhance access to human healthcare in underserved communities by utilizing veterinary services as a point of engagement. Participants reported a strong bond with their pet. Based on reported levels of trust and satisfaction, the OHC model may help strengthen relationships between underserved communities and human healthcare and veterinary professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"21501319251369270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251369270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/objectives: The purpose of this descriptive study was to strengthen understanding of the human-animal bond and the impact of One Health Clinics (OHCs) on the communities they serve. We aimed to assess how joint access to veterinary care and human health services enables community members to engage with healthcare for themselves.

Methods: Individuals attending 2 OHCs in the United States were surveyed to gain insight into reasons for attending OHCs, attitudes on the human-animal bond, healthcare access and utilization, and pet owner satisfaction and trust toward medical and veterinary professionals. Both clinics operated in areas with limited medical and veterinary healthcare access, but varied in clinic structure and availability of human healthcare volunteers.

Results: A total of 175 surveys were analyzed. Most participants attended primarily for veterinary services (Clinic A: 91%, Clinic B: 75%). However, a significantly higher proportion of Clinic B participants received health screenings (91% vs 32%, P < .0001), learned new health information (48% vs 31%, P = .0129), and were provided with follow-up health resources (84% vs 51%, P = .000007). Across both sites, the majority expressed high trust in medical and veterinary providers (Clinic A: 84%-95%, Clinic B: 90%-98%) and reported high satisfaction with the care received. Most participants considered their pets vital family members (Clinic A: 81%, Clinic B: 93%), and many credited their pets with supporting physical activity and reducing feelings of depression and loneliness. Importantly, a majority of respondents at both clinics indicated they were more likely to seek healthcare for themselves if veterinary services were also available (Clinic A: 56%, Clinic B: 72%).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that OHCs have the potential to enhance access to human healthcare in underserved communities by utilizing veterinary services as a point of engagement. Participants reported a strong bond with their pet. Based on reported levels of trust and satisfaction, the OHC model may help strengthen relationships between underserved communities and human healthcare and veterinary professionals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用人与动物的纽带促进服务不足社区的预防保健参与:对2家美国一家健康诊所的描述性研究。
前言/目的:本描述性研究的目的是加强对人与动物之间的联系以及“一个健康诊所”(OHCs)对其所服务社区的影响的理解。我们的目的是评估如何联合获得兽医护理和人类健康服务,使社区成员自己参与医疗保健。方法:对在美国参加2家宠物健康中心的个体进行调查,了解他们参加宠物健康中心的原因、对人-动物关系的态度、医疗保健的获取和利用以及宠物主人对医疗和兽医专业人员的满意度和信任度。这两个诊所都在医疗和兽医保健服务有限的地区开展业务,但诊所结构和人类保健志愿者的可用性各不相同。结果:共分析175份问卷。大多数参与者主要是为了兽医服务(诊所A: 91%,诊所B: 75%)。然而,诊所B参与者接受健康筛查的比例明显更高(91%对32%,P P =。0129),并提供随访卫生资源(84%对51%,P = 0.000007)。在这两个地点,大多数人对医疗和兽医提供者表示高度信任(诊所A: 84%-95%,诊所B: 90%-98%),并对所接受的护理表示高度满意。大多数参与者认为他们的宠物是重要的家庭成员(诊所A: 81%,诊所B: 93%),许多人认为他们的宠物支持身体活动,减少抑郁和孤独的感觉。重要的是,这两个诊所的大多数受访者表示,如果也有兽医服务,他们更有可能为自己寻求医疗保健(诊所a: 56%,诊所B: 72%)。结论:这些发现表明,卫生保健中心有潜力利用兽医服务作为参与点,在服务不足的社区提高人类卫生保健的可及性。参与者报告说,他们与宠物的关系很密切。根据报告的信任和满意度水平,OHC模式可能有助于加强服务不足的社区与人类卫生保健和兽医专业人员之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信