EXPRESS: Influence of word Age-of-Acquisition (AoA), vocabulary size, formal-lexical similarity, and semantic richness of words on lexical recognition and production: A study on foreign-word training.

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Miguel Á Pérez-Sánchez, Lidia Gómez-Cobos, Javier Marín, Hans Stadthagen-Gonzalez, Cristina Izura
{"title":"EXPRESS: Influence of word Age-of-Acquisition (AoA), vocabulary size, formal-lexical similarity, and semantic richness of words on lexical recognition and production: A study on foreign-word training.","authors":"Miguel Á Pérez-Sánchez, Lidia Gómez-Cobos, Javier Marín, Hans Stadthagen-Gonzalez, Cristina Izura","doi":"10.1177/17470218251378127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A distinctive feature of the lexicon is its susceptibility to the order in which words are acquired; those learned earlier are accessed and retrieved more quickly than those acquired later-a phenomenon known as the age of acquisition (AoA) effect. This study investigates how vocabulary size (i.e., word-set size), formal-lexical similarity (i.e., neighbourhood density), and semantic richness (i.e., number of meanings) influence the AoA effect in lexical recognition and production. Three experiments were conducted with Spanish-speaking participants learning Welsh words in a controlled laboratory setting. Some words (\"early\") were trained from the outset, while others (\"late\") were introduced later and interleaved with the early words. Experiment 1 (47 participants) explored the relationship between AoA and vocabulary size, showing that vocabulary size has a strengthening modulatory effect on the AoA effect in lexical decision accuracy, although the interaction was only marginally significant. Experiment 2 (27 participants) examined formal-lexical similarity, finding that AoA is unaffected by neighbourhood density. Experiment 3 (18 participants) assessed semantic richness, showing that AoA effects are modulated by the number of meanings a word possesses in a task-dependent manner: an AoA effect emerged only for two-meaning words in lexical decision, whereas it was observed only for one-meaning words in picture naming. Overall, the results provide mixed evidence for the AoA effect in word production and recognition, primarily influenced by semantic richness and task demands. While the findings mainly support the mapping hypothesis, they also challenge certain predictions derived from it, as well as from the semantic and integrated accounts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251378127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251378127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A distinctive feature of the lexicon is its susceptibility to the order in which words are acquired; those learned earlier are accessed and retrieved more quickly than those acquired later-a phenomenon known as the age of acquisition (AoA) effect. This study investigates how vocabulary size (i.e., word-set size), formal-lexical similarity (i.e., neighbourhood density), and semantic richness (i.e., number of meanings) influence the AoA effect in lexical recognition and production. Three experiments were conducted with Spanish-speaking participants learning Welsh words in a controlled laboratory setting. Some words ("early") were trained from the outset, while others ("late") were introduced later and interleaved with the early words. Experiment 1 (47 participants) explored the relationship between AoA and vocabulary size, showing that vocabulary size has a strengthening modulatory effect on the AoA effect in lexical decision accuracy, although the interaction was only marginally significant. Experiment 2 (27 participants) examined formal-lexical similarity, finding that AoA is unaffected by neighbourhood density. Experiment 3 (18 participants) assessed semantic richness, showing that AoA effects are modulated by the number of meanings a word possesses in a task-dependent manner: an AoA effect emerged only for two-meaning words in lexical decision, whereas it was observed only for one-meaning words in picture naming. Overall, the results provide mixed evidence for the AoA effect in word production and recognition, primarily influenced by semantic richness and task demands. While the findings mainly support the mapping hypothesis, they also challenge certain predictions derived from it, as well as from the semantic and integrated accounts.

词汇习得年龄、词汇量、形式词汇相似度和语义丰富度对词汇识别和生成的影响:一项外来词训练的研究。
词汇的一个显著特征是它易受词汇习得顺序的影响;较早习得的知识比较晚习得的知识被更快地获取和检索,这种现象被称为习得年龄效应。本研究探讨词汇量(即词集大小)、形式词汇相似度(即邻域密度)和语义丰富度(即意义数量)如何影响词汇识别和生成中的AoA效应。三个实验中,讲西班牙语的参与者在受控的实验室环境中学习威尔士语。一些单词(“early”)从一开始就被训练,而另一些单词(“late”)则是后来引入的,并与早期的单词交织在一起。实验1(47名被试)探讨了AoA与词汇量的关系,发现词汇量对AoA对词汇决策准确性的影响具有增强的调节作用,但交互作用不显著。实验2(27名参与者)检查了形式-词汇相似性,发现AoA不受邻居密度的影响。实验3(18名参与者)评估了语义丰富性,发现AoA效应以任务依赖的方式受到单词所拥有的意义数量的调节:仅在词汇决策中出现双义词的AoA效应,而仅在图片命名中出现单义词的AoA效应。结果表明,语义丰富度和任务需求对语义生成和识别的影响是混合的。虽然这些发现主要支持映射假说,但它们也挑战了由此得出的某些预测,以及从语义和综合的解释中得出的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信