Femtosecond Laser Flap-in-Flap Technique for Correction of Post-LASIK Myopic Regression.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mouamen M Seleet, Ismail I Hamza, Nancy E Ahmed
{"title":"Femtosecond Laser Flap-in-Flap Technique for Correction of Post-LASIK Myopic Regression.","authors":"Mouamen M Seleet, Ismail I Hamza, Nancy E Ahmed","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250624-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To discuss the technique and outcome of what the authors called the \"flap-in-flap\" technique and report its safety as a procedure for correction of post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) myopic regression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven eyes of 4 patients were included in this study. All patients had previously undergone LASIK for compound myopic astigmatism using the Moria M2 micro-keratome (Moria) 8 to 12 years prior to presentation. All had myopic refractive errors at presentation with a spherical equivalent ranging from -1.25 to -3.30 diopters. A new thinner femtosecond laser flap was created in the old LASIK flap and gently raised, and laser enhancement was performed. All patients were followed up 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after the procedure. At these visits, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), refraction, and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were measured. Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) and corneal anterior segment optical coherence tomography examinations were obtained on the third visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All eyes underwent uneventful enhancement using the flap-in-flap technique. All patients showed an improvement in vision, with 100% of eyes reaching a postoperative UDVA equal to or better than the preoperative CDVA. None of the eyes showed intraoperative complications such as gas breakthroughs or difficult dissections, and no postoperative flap-related complications were seen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study describes a technique for post-LASIK enhancement that is surgically safe and shows excellent visual outcomes with the potential to conserve the residual stromal bed and percentage of tissue altered, thus avoiding the risk of post-enhancement ectasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 9","pages":"e990-e997"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250624-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To discuss the technique and outcome of what the authors called the "flap-in-flap" technique and report its safety as a procedure for correction of post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) myopic regression.

Methods: Seven eyes of 4 patients were included in this study. All patients had previously undergone LASIK for compound myopic astigmatism using the Moria M2 micro-keratome (Moria) 8 to 12 years prior to presentation. All had myopic refractive errors at presentation with a spherical equivalent ranging from -1.25 to -3.30 diopters. A new thinner femtosecond laser flap was created in the old LASIK flap and gently raised, and laser enhancement was performed. All patients were followed up 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after the procedure. At these visits, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), refraction, and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were measured. Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) and corneal anterior segment optical coherence tomography examinations were obtained on the third visit.

Results: All eyes underwent uneventful enhancement using the flap-in-flap technique. All patients showed an improvement in vision, with 100% of eyes reaching a postoperative UDVA equal to or better than the preoperative CDVA. None of the eyes showed intraoperative complications such as gas breakthroughs or difficult dissections, and no postoperative flap-related complications were seen.

Conclusions: This study describes a technique for post-LASIK enhancement that is surgically safe and shows excellent visual outcomes with the potential to conserve the residual stromal bed and percentage of tissue altered, thus avoiding the risk of post-enhancement ectasia.

飞秒激光瓣中瓣技术矫正lasik术后近视。
目的:探讨作者所称的“皮瓣中皮瓣”技术的技术和结果,并报告其作为激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后近视矫正的安全性。方法:选取4例患者7只眼作为研究对象。所有患者在就诊前8至12年都曾使用Moria M2微角刀(Moria)接受过LASIK治疗复度性近视散光。所有患者均有近视屈光不正,其球形等效范围为-1.25至-3.30屈光度。在旧的LASIK皮瓣上创建了一个新的更薄的飞秒激光皮瓣,轻轻凸起,并进行激光增强。术后随访1周、1个月、3个月。在这些访问中,测量未矫正距离视力(UDVA),屈光和矫正距离视力(CDVA)。Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH)和角膜前段光学相干断层扫描检查在第三次就诊时进行。结果:所有眼均采用皮瓣中的皮瓣技术进行了平稳的增强。所有患者的视力均有改善,100%的眼睛术后UDVA等于或优于术前CDVA。术中无气体突破、解剖困难等并发症,术后无皮瓣相关并发症。结论:本研究描述了一种手术安全的lasik后增强技术,具有良好的视觉效果,有可能保留残余基质床和改变的组织百分比,从而避免了增强后扩张的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信