Treatments to Avoid Ranula Recurrence: A Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Marina Rocha Fonseca Souza, Moisés Willian Aparecido Gonçalves, Roberta Rayra Martins-Chaves, Rachel Alvarenga-Brant, Bruno Chrcanovic, Long Ge, Honghao Lai, Ricardo Santiago Gomez, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer
{"title":"Treatments to Avoid Ranula Recurrence: A Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Marina Rocha Fonseca Souza, Moisés Willian Aparecido Gonçalves, Roberta Rayra Martins-Chaves, Rachel Alvarenga-Brant, Bruno Chrcanovic, Long Ge, Honghao Lai, Ricardo Santiago Gomez, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer","doi":"10.1111/jop.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral and plunging ranulas require effective treatment strategies to minimize recurrence; yet no consensus exists on the most effective approach.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review evaluated several treatments for the recurrence of oral and plunging ranulas.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in five bibliographic databases and gray literature. Randomized and non-randomized studies were included if they investigated treatment approaches for oral or plunging ranulas. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was recurrence of (1) oral and (2) plunging ranula. For each type of ranula, a random-model frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) was established for seven treatment strategies: enucleation, micromarsupialization, marsupialization, marsupialization with packing, partial sublingual gland excision, sublingual gland excision, and sublingual gland excision plus submandibular gland excision. A minimal important difference (MID) and the GRADE approach for NMA were used for interpretation of data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies were included (all non-randomized-14 for oral ranula and six for plunging ranula). No treatment demonstrated clear superiority in preventing recurrence. Certainty of evidence was low to very low for oral ranulas and very low for plunging ranulas, primarily due to the risk of bias, imprecision, and intransitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the low certainty of evidence, no single treatment can be considered superior to others. Future research should prioritize longer follow-up randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":16588,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.70041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral and plunging ranulas require effective treatment strategies to minimize recurrence; yet no consensus exists on the most effective approach.

Objectives: This systematic review evaluated several treatments for the recurrence of oral and plunging ranulas.

Methodology: A comprehensive search was conducted in five bibliographic databases and gray literature. Randomized and non-randomized studies were included if they investigated treatment approaches for oral or plunging ranulas. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was recurrence of (1) oral and (2) plunging ranula. For each type of ranula, a random-model frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) was established for seven treatment strategies: enucleation, micromarsupialization, marsupialization, marsupialization with packing, partial sublingual gland excision, sublingual gland excision, and sublingual gland excision plus submandibular gland excision. A minimal important difference (MID) and the GRADE approach for NMA were used for interpretation of data.

Results: Eighteen studies were included (all non-randomized-14 for oral ranula and six for plunging ranula). No treatment demonstrated clear superiority in preventing recurrence. Certainty of evidence was low to very low for oral ranulas and very low for plunging ranulas, primarily due to the risk of bias, imprecision, and intransitivity.

Conclusions: Given the low certainty of evidence, no single treatment can be considered superior to others. Future research should prioritize longer follow-up randomized controlled trials.

避免牛痘复发的治疗:一项网络荟萃分析。
背景:需要有效的治疗策略以减少复发;然而,对于最有效的方法尚未达成共识。目的:本系统综述评价了几种治疗口腔和下陷性毛囊复发的方法。方法:对5个书目数据库和灰色文献进行全面检索。随机和非随机的研究,如果他们调查治疗方法的口腔或下陷的毛囊包括在内。两名独立审稿人筛选研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。主要结局是:(1)口腔和(2)下陷瘘管复发。针对每种类型的腱鞘,采用随机模型频率网络meta分析(NMA)对7种治疗策略进行分析:去核、微有袋切除、有袋切除、有袋切除合并填塞、部分舌下腺切除、舌下腺切除、舌下腺切除加颌下腺切除。最小重要差异(MID)和GRADE方法用于NMA的数据解释。结果:纳入了18项研究(均为非随机研究,14项针对口服甲壳,6项针对深置甲壳)。在预防复发方面没有明显的优势。由于存在偏倚、不精确和不可传递性的风险,口服甲壳和穿刺甲壳的证据确定性低至极低。结论:鉴于证据的低确定性,没有一种治疗方法可以被认为优于其他治疗方法。未来的研究应优先考虑长期随访的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine is to publish manuscripts of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in oral pathology and oral medicine. Papers advancing the science or practice of these disciplines will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of techniques within the spheres of light and electron microscopy, tissue and organ culture, immunology, histochemistry and immunocytochemistry, microbiology, genetics and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信