Investigation of the Endometrial Microbiome in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Individuals: Microbial Imbalance and Network Fragility.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
International Journal of Women's Health Pub Date : 2025-09-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S534065
Bolun Zhang, Shaochong Lin, Sidong Wang, Weiyu Chen, Yushu Chen, Dandan Cao, Qingzhi Liu, Yuanqing Yao
{"title":"Investigation of the Endometrial Microbiome in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Individuals: Microbial Imbalance and Network Fragility.","authors":"Bolun Zhang, Shaochong Lin, Sidong Wang, Weiyu Chen, Yushu Chen, Dandan Cao, Qingzhi Liu, Yuanqing Yao","doi":"10.2147/IJWH.S534065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that an abnormal endometrial microbiota may be a potential factor contributing to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). This study aimed to characterize the endometrial microbiota in patients with RPL and to explore its association with miscarriage.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, EndoMetrial Microbiome Assay (EMMA) data from women attending clinics were collected and categorized into RPL and control groups according to their miscarriage history. Species diversity analysis, differential microbiota analysis, and machine learning methods were employed to identify key microbial genera associated with RPL. Microbial network analysis was then performed to further characterize the endometrial microbiome in patients with RPL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in α-diversity were observed between the RPL and control groups across multiple indices (all P > 0.05); however, β-diversity differed significantly (Euclidean distance, P = 0.039). Regarding species composition, the control group showed a significantly higher abundance of <i>Lactobacillus</i>, whereas the RPL group had increased levels of pathogenic bacteria, including <i>Gardnerella, Staphylococcus</i>, and <i>Streptococcus</i>. Machine learning identified three key genera associated with RPL: <i>Streptococcus, Chryseobacterium</i>, and <i>Fusobacterium</i>. Microbial network analysis further revealed the fragility of the endometrial microbial community in patients with RPL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings offer novel insights into the mechanisms of endometrial microenvironmental changes in patients with RPL and highlight potential microbial biomarkers and therapeutic targets for future clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14356,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Women's Health","volume":"17 ","pages":"2853-2868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S534065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Emerging evidence suggests that an abnormal endometrial microbiota may be a potential factor contributing to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). This study aimed to characterize the endometrial microbiota in patients with RPL and to explore its association with miscarriage.

Patients and methods: Based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, EndoMetrial Microbiome Assay (EMMA) data from women attending clinics were collected and categorized into RPL and control groups according to their miscarriage history. Species diversity analysis, differential microbiota analysis, and machine learning methods were employed to identify key microbial genera associated with RPL. Microbial network analysis was then performed to further characterize the endometrial microbiome in patients with RPL.

Results: No significant differences in α-diversity were observed between the RPL and control groups across multiple indices (all P > 0.05); however, β-diversity differed significantly (Euclidean distance, P = 0.039). Regarding species composition, the control group showed a significantly higher abundance of Lactobacillus, whereas the RPL group had increased levels of pathogenic bacteria, including Gardnerella, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus. Machine learning identified three key genera associated with RPL: Streptococcus, Chryseobacterium, and Fusobacterium. Microbial network analysis further revealed the fragility of the endometrial microbial community in patients with RPL.

Conclusion: These findings offer novel insights into the mechanisms of endometrial microenvironmental changes in patients with RPL and highlight potential microbial biomarkers and therapeutic targets for future clinical applications.

反复妊娠流产个体子宫内膜微生物组的研究:微生物失衡和网络脆弱性。
目的:越来越多的证据表明,子宫内膜微生物群异常可能是导致复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)的潜在因素。本研究旨在表征RPL患者子宫内膜微生物群,并探讨其与流产的关系。患者和方法:根据特定的纳入和排除标准,收集就诊妇女的子宫内膜微生物组测定(EMMA)数据,并根据其流产史分为RPL组和对照组。采用物种多样性分析、差异微生物群分析和机器学习方法鉴定与RPL相关的关键微生物属。然后进行微生物网络分析以进一步表征RPL患者的子宫内膜微生物组。结果:RPL组与对照组在多个指标上α-多样性差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05);而β多样性差异显著(欧几里得距离,P = 0.039)。在菌种组成方面,对照组乳酸菌的丰度明显高于对照组,而RPL组的致病菌水平增加,包括加德纳菌、葡萄球菌和链球菌。机器学习确定了与RPL相关的三个关键属:链球菌、黄杆菌和梭杆菌。微生物网络分析进一步揭示了RPL患者子宫内膜微生物群落的脆弱性。结论:这些发现为RPL患者子宫内膜微环境变化的机制提供了新的见解,并为未来临床应用提供了潜在的微生物生物标志物和治疗靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Women's Health
International Journal of Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Women''s Health is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of women''s healthcare including gynecology, obstetrics, and breast cancer. Subject areas include: Chronic conditions including cancers of various organs specific and not specific to women Migraine, headaches, arthritis, osteoporosis Endocrine and autoimmune syndromes - asthma, multiple sclerosis, lupus, diabetes Sexual and reproductive health including fertility patterns and emerging technologies to address infertility Infectious disease with chronic sequelae including HIV/AIDS, HPV, PID, and other STDs Psychological and psychosocial conditions - depression across the life span, substance abuse, domestic violence Health maintenance among aging females - factors affecting the quality of life including physical, social and mental issues Avenues for health promotion and disease prevention across the life span Male vs female incidence comparisons for conditions that affect both genders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信