A U-shaped relationship between body mass index and the risk of elevated liver stiffness in older people: evidence from the 5-year retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Liang Lv, Lu Long, Yue Zheng, Nan Yang, Jinyu Xiao, Tianpei Ma, Xin Chen, Xinyang Dui, Xiaoxue Liu, Tao Zhang, Huan Zhou, Juan Liao, Jiayuan Li
{"title":"A U-shaped relationship between body mass index and the risk of elevated liver stiffness in older people: evidence from the 5-year retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Liang Lv, Lu Long, Yue Zheng, Nan Yang, Jinyu Xiao, Tianpei Ma, Xin Chen, Xinyang Dui, Xiaoxue Liu, Tao Zhang, Huan Zhou, Juan Liao, Jiayuan Li","doi":"10.1038/s41366-025-01849-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and liver stiffness in older people remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between BMI and the risk of elevated liver stiffness in older people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>2736 participants from the West China Health and Aging Cohort Study (WCHAC) were included in the present study. Liver stiffness was assessed using transient elastography (TE). The association of the 5-year average BMI level with elevated liver stiffness risk was estimated using multinomial logistic regression. The group-based trajectory model (GBTM) was applied to identify BMI trajectories. Additionally, restricted cubic spline analysis was conducted to explore the dose-response association between BMI and the risk of elevated liver stiffness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the second BMI quartile (21.93-23.58) had the lowest prevalence of elevated liver stiffness, and then the risk increased with higher BMI quartiles (BMI Q4 vs. Q2, OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.37-3.11 and Q5 vs. Q2, OR = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.78-4.39). There were five BMI trajectories over the five-year period: low-normal-weight stable (7.42%), moderate-normal-weight stable (29.10%), low-level-overweight stable (36.22%), high-level-overweight stable (20.32%) and stable obesity (6.94%). Participants in the moderate-normal-weight stable group had the lowest prevalence of elevated liver stiffness. Compared with this group, the adjusted ORs (95% CI) elevated liver stiffness prevalence were 2.02 (1.39-2.97) for the high-level-overweight stable, and 2.83 (1.72-4.64) for the group of people with stable obesity. Dose-response analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between BMI and elevated liver stiffness risk, suggesting an optimal BMI range of 21.8-24.3 kg/m² for older people to minimize elevated liver stiffness risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study elucidated the U-shaped relationship between BMI and the risk of elevated liver stiffness as measured by TE, and the optimal BMI range from 21.8 to 24.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for the lowest risk of elevated liver stiffness in older people.</p>","PeriodicalId":14183,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Obesity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-025-01849-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and liver stiffness in older people remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between BMI and the risk of elevated liver stiffness in older people.

Methods: 2736 participants from the West China Health and Aging Cohort Study (WCHAC) were included in the present study. Liver stiffness was assessed using transient elastography (TE). The association of the 5-year average BMI level with elevated liver stiffness risk was estimated using multinomial logistic regression. The group-based trajectory model (GBTM) was applied to identify BMI trajectories. Additionally, restricted cubic spline analysis was conducted to explore the dose-response association between BMI and the risk of elevated liver stiffness.

Results: Participants in the second BMI quartile (21.93-23.58) had the lowest prevalence of elevated liver stiffness, and then the risk increased with higher BMI quartiles (BMI Q4 vs. Q2, OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.37-3.11 and Q5 vs. Q2, OR = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.78-4.39). There were five BMI trajectories over the five-year period: low-normal-weight stable (7.42%), moderate-normal-weight stable (29.10%), low-level-overweight stable (36.22%), high-level-overweight stable (20.32%) and stable obesity (6.94%). Participants in the moderate-normal-weight stable group had the lowest prevalence of elevated liver stiffness. Compared with this group, the adjusted ORs (95% CI) elevated liver stiffness prevalence were 2.02 (1.39-2.97) for the high-level-overweight stable, and 2.83 (1.72-4.64) for the group of people with stable obesity. Dose-response analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between BMI and elevated liver stiffness risk, suggesting an optimal BMI range of 21.8-24.3 kg/m² for older people to minimize elevated liver stiffness risk.

Conclusions: Our study elucidated the U-shaped relationship between BMI and the risk of elevated liver stiffness as measured by TE, and the optimal BMI range from 21.8 to 24.3 kg/m2 for the lowest risk of elevated liver stiffness in older people.

老年人体重指数与肝硬化风险呈u型关系:来自5年回顾性队列研究的证据
背景:老年人体重指数(BMI)与肝脏硬度之间的关系尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是研究老年人身体质量指数与肝硬化风险升高之间的关系。方法:从中国西部健康与老龄化队列研究(WCHAC)中纳入2736名受试者。采用瞬时弹性图(TE)评估肝脏硬度。使用多项逻辑回归估计5年平均BMI水平与肝僵硬风险升高的关系。采用基于组的轨迹模型(GBTM)识别BMI轨迹。此外,我们还进行了限制性三次样条分析,以探讨BMI与肝脏僵硬度升高风险之间的剂量-反应关系。结果:第二个BMI四分位数(21.93-23.58)的参与者肝脏僵硬升高的患病率最低,然后随着BMI四分位数的增加,风险增加(BMI Q4 vs. Q2, OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.37-3.11; Q5 vs. Q2, OR = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.78-4.39)。在5年期间,有5种BMI轨迹:低正常体重稳定(7.42%)、中等正常体重稳定(29.10%)、低超重稳定(36.22%)、高超重稳定(20.32%)和稳定肥胖(6.94%)。中等正常体重稳定组的参与者肝硬度升高的患病率最低。与该组相比,高度超重稳定组的调整后ORs (95% CI)升高的肝脏硬度患病率为2.02(1.39-2.97),而稳定肥胖组的调整后ORs (95% CI)为2.83(1.72-4.64)。剂量-反应分析显示BMI与肝僵硬风险升高之间呈u型关系,表明老年人的最佳BMI范围为21.8-24.3 kg/m²,以尽量减少肝僵硬风险升高。结论:我们的研究阐明了BMI与TE测量的肝硬度升高风险之间的u型关系,老年人肝硬度升高风险最低的最佳BMI范围为21.8 - 24.3 kg/m2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Obesity
International Journal of Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obesity is a multi-disciplinary forum for research describing basic, clinical and applied studies in biochemistry, physiology, genetics and nutrition, molecular, metabolic, psychological and epidemiological aspects of obesity and related disorders. We publish a range of content types including original research articles, technical reports, reviews, correspondence and brief communications that elaborate on significant advances in the field and cover topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信