Long-term outcomes and quality of life after repair of benign biliary stricture of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injury.

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jyoti Kharel, Thakur Deen Yadav, Rajesh Gupta, Harjeet Singh
{"title":"Long-term outcomes and quality of life after repair of benign biliary stricture of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injury.","authors":"Jyoti Kharel, Thakur Deen Yadav, Rajesh Gupta, Harjeet Singh","doi":"10.1007/s12664-025-01832-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bile duct injury (BDI) is a potentially devastating complication of cholecystectomy. Although the repair may be successful, patients often experience a decline in their quality of life (QoL). However, there is a paucity of data regarding the factors influencing long-term outcomes and QOL in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent benign biliary stricture (BBS) repair with at least three years of follow-up were assessed for inclusion in the study. Long-term outcomes were assessed with MacDonald Grading. QOL assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire, with a control group of patients who had uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 156 patients screened, 41 were included in the study, with a median follow-up duration of five (IQR 4.8) years. Successful long-term outcomes with MacDonald outcome grade A were observed in 28 (68.3%) patients, 12 (29.2%) patients had grade B and one (2.4%) had grade-D outcomes. External biliary fistula at the time of repair had grade-D outcome in one patient (14.2%) and grades B and A in three (42.9%) patients each. The higher strictures (types IV and V) were associated with higher MacDonald grade-B outcomes compared to types I-III strictures (7 [53.8%] vs. 5 [17.9%]) , whereas lower strictures were more likely to have grade-A outcomes as compared to higher strictures (22 [78.6%] vs. 6 [46.2%] [p = 0.044]). Patients with BDI repair reported significantly lower scores in all eight SF-36 domains compared to controls (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The long-term outcomes of delayed BBS repair are favorable in high-volume center. Despite the acceptable post operative clinical outcomes, the long-term QOL remains compromised after BBS repairs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-025-01832-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bile duct injury (BDI) is a potentially devastating complication of cholecystectomy. Although the repair may be successful, patients often experience a decline in their quality of life (QoL). However, there is a paucity of data regarding the factors influencing long-term outcomes and QOL in these patients.

Methods: Patients who underwent benign biliary stricture (BBS) repair with at least three years of follow-up were assessed for inclusion in the study. Long-term outcomes were assessed with MacDonald Grading. QOL assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire, with a control group of patients who had uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Results: Of 156 patients screened, 41 were included in the study, with a median follow-up duration of five (IQR 4.8) years. Successful long-term outcomes with MacDonald outcome grade A were observed in 28 (68.3%) patients, 12 (29.2%) patients had grade B and one (2.4%) had grade-D outcomes. External biliary fistula at the time of repair had grade-D outcome in one patient (14.2%) and grades B and A in three (42.9%) patients each. The higher strictures (types IV and V) were associated with higher MacDonald grade-B outcomes compared to types I-III strictures (7 [53.8%] vs. 5 [17.9%]) , whereas lower strictures were more likely to have grade-A outcomes as compared to higher strictures (22 [78.6%] vs. 6 [46.2%] [p = 0.044]). Patients with BDI repair reported significantly lower scores in all eight SF-36 domains compared to controls (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The long-term outcomes of delayed BBS repair are favorable in high-volume center. Despite the acceptable post operative clinical outcomes, the long-term QOL remains compromised after BBS repairs.

胆囊切除术后胆管损伤良性胆道狭窄修复术后的远期疗效及生活质量。
胆管损伤(BDI)是胆囊切除术中一种潜在的破坏性并发症。虽然修复可能是成功的,但患者的生活质量(QoL)往往会下降。然而,缺乏影响这些患者长期预后和生活质量的因素的数据。方法:接受良性胆道狭窄(BBS)修复且随访至少3年的患者被纳入本研究。采用MacDonald评分法评估长期疗效。使用SF-36问卷评估生活质量,对照组为无并发症的腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)患者。结果:156例筛查患者中,41例纳入研究,中位随访时间为5年(IQR 4.8)年。28例(68.3%)患者的麦克唐纳预后等级为A级,12例(29.2%)患者为B级,1例(2.4%)患者为d级。修复时,1例(14.2%)患者的预后为d级,3例(42.9%)患者的预后为B级和A级。与I-III型狭窄相比,较高的狭窄(IV型和V型)具有较高的麦克唐纳b级预后(7例[53.8%]对5例[17.9%]),而较低的狭窄与较高的狭窄相比,更有可能具有a级预后(22例[78.6%]对6例[46.2%][p = 0.044])。与对照组相比,BDI修复患者在所有8个SF-36域的评分均显著降低(p)。结论:延迟BBS修复在大容量中心的长期结果是有利的。尽管术后临床结果可接受,但BBS修复后的长期生活质量仍然受到损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信