Microbial enriched vermicompost efficiently substitutes soil nutrients, microbial populations and enzymatic activity for the growth and yield of tuberose (Agave amica Medik.) cv. Single.

IF 3.1 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Mukesh Kumar, Veena Chaudhary, Vidisha Chaudhary, Ravi Kumar, Krishna Kaushik, Rajan Bhatt, R K Naresh, Ahmed Gaber, Akbar Hossain
{"title":"Microbial enriched vermicompost efficiently substitutes soil nutrients, microbial populations and enzymatic activity for the growth and yield of tuberose (Agave amica Medik.) cv. Single.","authors":"Mukesh Kumar, Veena Chaudhary, Vidisha Chaudhary, Ravi Kumar, Krishna Kaushik, Rajan Bhatt, R K Naresh, Ahmed Gaber, Akbar Hossain","doi":"10.1007/s12223-025-01325-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to reduce the chemical fertilizers with microbial inoculant-rich vermicompost, which enhanced the growth, flowering, and soil health of the tuberose crop. A total of six treatments were applied with reducing doses of synthetic fertilizers under a factorial randomized design and replicated thrice. In this study, vermicompost (VC) made from cow dung and vegetable waste utilizing Eisenia foetida and their mixed biomass were enriched with microbial inoculants and assessed for their impact on microbial and enzymatic populations including urease, acid phosphatase activity and dehydrogenase activity in soil, nutrient availability, and tuberose development and flowering. The enriched vermicompost was effectively prepared through seventy- day incubation process involving rock phosphate, Azotobacter chroococcum, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus megaterium), and potassium-solubilizing bacteria (Frateuria aurantia). Compared with simple vermicompost, enriched vermicompost was found to be superior in terms of N, P, K, and micronutrient contents. The tuberose growth parameters revealed that treatment T<sub>3</sub> (8-ton enriched VC ha<sup>-1</sup>) had the minimum number of days for 50% sprouting and the maximum number of leaves/plant among the different treatments, whereas T<sub>5</sub> (50% RDF ha<sup>-1</sup> + 4-ton enriched VC ha<sup>-1</sup>) and T<sub>6</sub> (25% RDF ha<sup>-1</sup> + 6-ton enriched VC ha<sup>-1</sup>) had the maximum plant height and the maximum number of shoots/bulb, respectively. With respect to the flowering parameters, plants fertilized with T<sub>4</sub> (75% RDF ha<sup>-1</sup> + 2-ton enriched VC ha<sup>-1</sup>) resulted in a minimum of 50% blooming, and plants fertilized with T<sub>5</sub> presented a minimum number of days to spike visibility and opening of flowers and were superior in terms of the maximum floret and spike length, number of spikes/bulb, number of florets/spike, and vase life of the spike. Higher NP and K contents and soil microbial and enzymatic activities, such as those of soil bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, total microbial population, urease, acid phosphatase, and dehydrogenase activities, were recorded in treatment T<sub>3</sub>, whereas the soil organic carbon content was on par with those in treatments T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>6</sub>. This study suggests that enriched vermicompost may replace 50% of synthetic fertilizers, increase flower yield, and improve soil health of tuberose.</p>","PeriodicalId":12346,"journal":{"name":"Folia microbiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia microbiologica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-025-01325-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to reduce the chemical fertilizers with microbial inoculant-rich vermicompost, which enhanced the growth, flowering, and soil health of the tuberose crop. A total of six treatments were applied with reducing doses of synthetic fertilizers under a factorial randomized design and replicated thrice. In this study, vermicompost (VC) made from cow dung and vegetable waste utilizing Eisenia foetida and their mixed biomass were enriched with microbial inoculants and assessed for their impact on microbial and enzymatic populations including urease, acid phosphatase activity and dehydrogenase activity in soil, nutrient availability, and tuberose development and flowering. The enriched vermicompost was effectively prepared through seventy- day incubation process involving rock phosphate, Azotobacter chroococcum, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus megaterium), and potassium-solubilizing bacteria (Frateuria aurantia). Compared with simple vermicompost, enriched vermicompost was found to be superior in terms of N, P, K, and micronutrient contents. The tuberose growth parameters revealed that treatment T3 (8-ton enriched VC ha-1) had the minimum number of days for 50% sprouting and the maximum number of leaves/plant among the different treatments, whereas T5 (50% RDF ha-1 + 4-ton enriched VC ha-1) and T6 (25% RDF ha-1 + 6-ton enriched VC ha-1) had the maximum plant height and the maximum number of shoots/bulb, respectively. With respect to the flowering parameters, plants fertilized with T4 (75% RDF ha-1 + 2-ton enriched VC ha-1) resulted in a minimum of 50% blooming, and plants fertilized with T5 presented a minimum number of days to spike visibility and opening of flowers and were superior in terms of the maximum floret and spike length, number of spikes/bulb, number of florets/spike, and vase life of the spike. Higher NP and K contents and soil microbial and enzymatic activities, such as those of soil bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, total microbial population, urease, acid phosphatase, and dehydrogenase activities, were recorded in treatment T3, whereas the soil organic carbon content was on par with those in treatments T3 and T6. This study suggests that enriched vermicompost may replace 50% of synthetic fertilizers, increase flower yield, and improve soil health of tuberose.

富微生物蚯蚓堆肥有效替代土壤养分、微生物种群和酶活性,促进龙舌兰(Agave amica Medik.)生长和产量。单身。
本研究的目的是通过施用富含微生物菌剂的蚯蚓堆肥,减少化肥用量,促进薯类作物的生长、开花和土壤健康。在因子随机设计下,共6个处理施用减少剂量的合成肥料,重复3次。本研究以牛粪和蔬菜垃圾为原料,利用Eisenia foetida及其混合生物量,在蚯蚓堆肥(VC)中添加微生物接种剂,并评估其对土壤微生物和酶种群的影响,包括脲酶、酸性磷酸酶活性和脱氢酶活性,养分有效性以及结核的发育和开花。通过70天的磷矿、嗜绿固氮菌、增磷菌(巨芽孢杆菌)和增钾菌(金友情菌)的孵育过程,有效地制备了富集的蚯蚓堆肥。与简单蚯蚓堆肥相比,强化蚯蚓堆肥在氮、磷、钾和微量元素含量方面均优于普通蚯蚓堆肥。结果表明,不同处理中,T3(8吨富集VC ha-1)处理50%发芽期最短,单株叶数最多,T5 (50% RDF ha-1 + 4吨富集VC ha-1)和T6 (25% RDF ha-1 + 6吨富集VC ha-1)处理株高最高,芽/球茎数最多。在开花参数方面,T4 (75% RDF ha-1 + 2吨富集VC ha-1)处理植株开花率最低,T5处理植株穗能见度和开花天数最短,在最大小花和穗长、穗数/球茎数、穗数/穗数和穗花瓶寿命方面均优于T4处理植株。处理T3的NP、K含量和土壤细菌、真菌、放线菌、微生物总数、脲酶、酸性磷酸酶和脱氢酶活性均高于处理T3和T6,土壤有机碳含量与处理T3和T6相当。本研究表明,添加蚯蚓堆肥可替代50%的合成肥料,提高花产量,改善马铃薯的土壤健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia microbiologica
Folia microbiologica 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Unlike journals which specialize ever more narrowly, Folia Microbiologica (FM) takes an open approach that spans general, soil, medical and industrial microbiology, plus some branches of immunology. This English-language journal publishes original papers, reviews and mini-reviews, short communications and book reviews. The coverage includes cutting-edge methods and promising new topics, as well as studies using established methods that exhibit promise in practical applications such as medicine, animal husbandry and more. The coverage of FM is expanding beyond Central and Eastern Europe, with a growing proportion of its contents contributed by international authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信