Efficacy and welfare effects of different forms of physical restraint for upper airway endoscopy of horses.

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Claire O'Brien, Olivier Simon, Samantha H Franklin, Gustavo Ferlini Agne, Sarah Weaver, Sharanne L Raidal
{"title":"Efficacy and welfare effects of different forms of physical restraint for upper airway endoscopy of horses.","authors":"Claire O'Brien, Olivier Simon, Samantha H Franklin, Gustavo Ferlini Agne, Sarah Weaver, Sharanne L Raidal","doi":"10.1111/evj.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical restraint of horses for veterinary procedures is necessary to allow completion of tasks effectively and without injury to patient or personnel.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare physiological effects and behavioural responses to four commonly used restraint techniques for upper respiratory tract (URT) endoscopy in unsedated horses.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Blocked and randomised interventional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve university owned teaching horses were blocked into groups of four and randomly allocated to one of four restraint methods (nose twitch, ear hold, Stableizer® and nil restraint) for URT endoscopy. Horse response to restraint and endoscopy was evaluated subjectively and by objective measures of procedural efficacy (duration and head movement), time domain indices of heart rate variability (HRV), saliva cortisol and plasma β-endorphin concentrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Horses demonstrated strong individual differences for procedure tolerance and preferred method of restraint, but there were no differences observed in outcome measures related to procedural efficacy or neuroendocrine response associated with restraint type. Repetition of experimental procedures was associated with a progressive decrease in mean (95% CI) minimum heart rate from 34.2 (31.7-36.7) to 30.1 (28.0-32.2) bpm (p < 0.001), and increased HRV measures related to parasympathetic dominance. Cortisol was greatest on Day 2 (1.5, 1.1-2.5 nmol/L; median, 95% CI), compared with Day 1 (0.8, 0.5-1.6 nmol/L; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Convenience sample of horses familiar with most study interventions; intervention was minimally invasive and of short duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study findings did not support current recommendations to prioritise one type of restraint over other available techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.70081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical restraint of horses for veterinary procedures is necessary to allow completion of tasks effectively and without injury to patient or personnel.

Objectives: To compare physiological effects and behavioural responses to four commonly used restraint techniques for upper respiratory tract (URT) endoscopy in unsedated horses.

Study design: Blocked and randomised interventional study.

Methods: Twelve university owned teaching horses were blocked into groups of four and randomly allocated to one of four restraint methods (nose twitch, ear hold, Stableizer® and nil restraint) for URT endoscopy. Horse response to restraint and endoscopy was evaluated subjectively and by objective measures of procedural efficacy (duration and head movement), time domain indices of heart rate variability (HRV), saliva cortisol and plasma β-endorphin concentrations.

Results: Horses demonstrated strong individual differences for procedure tolerance and preferred method of restraint, but there were no differences observed in outcome measures related to procedural efficacy or neuroendocrine response associated with restraint type. Repetition of experimental procedures was associated with a progressive decrease in mean (95% CI) minimum heart rate from 34.2 (31.7-36.7) to 30.1 (28.0-32.2) bpm (p < 0.001), and increased HRV measures related to parasympathetic dominance. Cortisol was greatest on Day 2 (1.5, 1.1-2.5 nmol/L; median, 95% CI), compared with Day 1 (0.8, 0.5-1.6 nmol/L; p = 0.02).

Main limitations: Convenience sample of horses familiar with most study interventions; intervention was minimally invasive and of short duration.

Conclusions: Study findings did not support current recommendations to prioritise one type of restraint over other available techniques.

不同形式的物理约束对马上呼吸道内窥镜检查的疗效和福利效果。
背景:在兽医程序中对马匹进行物理约束是必要的,可以有效地完成任务,并且不会伤害患者或人员。目的:比较非镇静马上呼吸道内窥镜检查中常用的四种约束技术的生理效应和行为反应。研究设计:阻断和随机介入研究。方法:将12匹大学所属的教学马分成4组,随机分配到4种约束方法(抽鼻、捂耳、Stableizer®和无约束)中的一种进行上呼吸道内窥镜检查。通过程序有效性(持续时间和头部运动)、心率变异性(HRV)时域指数、唾液皮质醇和血浆β-内啡肽浓度,主观和客观地评估马对约束和内窥镜检查的反应。结果:马在程序耐受性和偏好约束方法方面表现出强烈的个体差异,但在与程序有效性或与约束类型相关的神经内分泌反应相关的结果测量中没有观察到差异。实验过程的重复与平均(95% CI)最低心率从34.2 (31.7-36.7)bpm逐渐下降到30.1 (28.0-32.2)bpm相关(p)。主要限制:方便的马样本熟悉大多数研究干预措施;干预是微创的,持续时间短。结论:研究结果不支持当前的建议,即优先考虑一种类型的约束而不是其他可用的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Equine Veterinary Journal
Equine Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信