The Preanalytical Error Rates of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Central Laboratory.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Zeliha Kocaismail, Esra Yıldırım Demirçin, Esra Fırat Oğuz
{"title":"The Preanalytical Error Rates of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Central Laboratory.","authors":"Zeliha Kocaismail, Esra Yıldırım Demirçin, Esra Fırat Oğuz","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.250248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical laboratories have a crucial role in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of diseases. The total testing procedure is significantly affected by the preanalytical factors. In this study, we aimed to assess pre-analytical errors to ensure high-quality laboratory performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A one-year retrospective data analysis from the Laboratory Information System was conducted, focusing on the sample rejections for the year 2023 from the central laboratory of our hospital. The data is evaluated based on the samples sent from various departments and by the analytic groups studied from these samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of samples admitted to the central laboratory of the Ankara Bilkent City Hospital were 2,647,527 in year 2023. Out of this total number, 35,024 samples (1.32%) were rejected. Among these rejections, 29,699 samples (84.8%) were rejected due to preanalytical causes. The most encountered preanalytical rejection reasons were improper test request, inadequate sample volume, and incomplete/incorrect information in the test request. The biochemistry samples had the highest rejection rates in the main, cardiovascular, oncology, obstetrics & gynecology, and physical therapy & rehabilitation departments. The coagulation samples were mostly rejected in the neurology and orthopedics departments, and the hemogram samples had the highest rejection rates in the pediatrics department.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preanalytical phase of the total testing procedure is the stage most vulnerable to errors. Therefore, it is crucial to focus on identifying preanalytical errors and implementing corrective actions, as this will enhance the accuracy and quality of the test results.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"71 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.250248","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical laboratories have a crucial role in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of diseases. The total testing procedure is significantly affected by the preanalytical factors. In this study, we aimed to assess pre-analytical errors to ensure high-quality laboratory performance.

Methods: A one-year retrospective data analysis from the Laboratory Information System was conducted, focusing on the sample rejections for the year 2023 from the central laboratory of our hospital. The data is evaluated based on the samples sent from various departments and by the analytic groups studied from these samples.

Results: The total number of samples admitted to the central laboratory of the Ankara Bilkent City Hospital were 2,647,527 in year 2023. Out of this total number, 35,024 samples (1.32%) were rejected. Among these rejections, 29,699 samples (84.8%) were rejected due to preanalytical causes. The most encountered preanalytical rejection reasons were improper test request, inadequate sample volume, and incomplete/incorrect information in the test request. The biochemistry samples had the highest rejection rates in the main, cardiovascular, oncology, obstetrics & gynecology, and physical therapy & rehabilitation departments. The coagulation samples were mostly rejected in the neurology and orthopedics departments, and the hemogram samples had the highest rejection rates in the pediatrics department.

Conclusions: The preanalytical phase of the total testing procedure is the stage most vulnerable to errors. Therefore, it is crucial to focus on identifying preanalytical errors and implementing corrective actions, as this will enhance the accuracy and quality of the test results.

安卡拉比尔肯特市医院中心实验室分析前错误率。
背景:临床实验室在疾病的诊断、监测和治疗中起着至关重要的作用。总的测试过程受到分析前因素的显著影响。在本研究中,我们旨在评估分析前误差,以确保高质量的实验室性能。方法:回顾性分析实验室信息系统1年的数据,重点分析我院中心实验室2023年度的拒收样本。这些数据是根据来自各个部门的样本和分析小组对这些样本进行评估的。结果:2023年安卡拉比尔肯特市医院中心实验室收治的样本总数为2,647,527例。在总数中,35,024个样本(1.32%)被拒绝。其中,29699份(84.8%)样品因分析前原因被拒绝。最常见的分析前拒收原因是不适当的测试请求、样品量不足和测试请求中的信息不完整/不正确。生物化学样本排斥率最高的科室为内科、心血管科、肿瘤科、妇产科、理疗康复科。凝血标本拒绝率以神经内科和骨科居多,血象标本拒绝率以儿科最高。结论:整个检测程序的分析前阶段是最容易出错的阶段。因此,重点识别分析前错误并实施纠正措施是至关重要的,因为这将提高测试结果的准确性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信