Human Health Risk Assessment of Fluoride Intake from Tea and Herbal Infusion (Loose-Leaf and Bagged) Consumption in Brazil.

IF 3.6 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Júlia Oliveira Penteado, Gustavo de Oliveira Silveira, Rodrigo de Lima Brum, Lívia da Silva Freitas, Flávio Manoel Rodrigues da Silva Júnior
{"title":"Human Health Risk Assessment of Fluoride Intake from Tea and Herbal Infusion (Loose-Leaf and Bagged) Consumption in Brazil.","authors":"Júlia Oliveira Penteado, Gustavo de Oliveira Silveira, Rodrigo de Lima Brum, Lívia da Silva Freitas, Flávio Manoel Rodrigues da Silva Júnior","doi":"10.1007/s12011-025-04817-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate fluoride concentrations in a variety of commonly consumed teas and Herbal infusions in Brazil and assess potential Health risks associated with their ingestion. A total of 21 samples were analyzed, including 12 loose-leaf and 9 commercially bagged products. Fluoride quantification was performed using a validated spectrophotometric method, and a deterministic and probabilistic human Health risk assessment was conducted. Fluoride concentrations ranged from 0.5 mg/L (eucalyptus) to 52.8 mg/L (hibiscus) in loose-leaf samples, and from 7.5 mg/L (anis) to 47.9 mg/L (hibiscus) in bagged products. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed in six of the nine comparable samples between formats. The non-carcinogenic risk assessment revealed that 3 out of 21 samples, hibiscus (both forms) and boldo (loose-leaf), exceeded the acceptable HQ > 1. Monte Carlo simulation confirmed these findings, with hibiscus infusions showing HQ > 1 in over 90% of the 10,000 iterations. Additionally, the average HI exceeded 1 in six loose-leaf and all bagged samples, with hibiscus reaching a peak HI of 18.06. These findings suggest that the consumption of certain teas and infusions, especially those with high fluoride concentrations, may contribute to excessive fluoride intake and potential health risks. The results support the need for clearer labeling and stricter regulation of fluoride content in tea and infusion products, particularly in countries like Brazil where their consumption is increasing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8917,"journal":{"name":"Biological Trace Element Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Trace Element Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-025-04817-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate fluoride concentrations in a variety of commonly consumed teas and Herbal infusions in Brazil and assess potential Health risks associated with their ingestion. A total of 21 samples were analyzed, including 12 loose-leaf and 9 commercially bagged products. Fluoride quantification was performed using a validated spectrophotometric method, and a deterministic and probabilistic human Health risk assessment was conducted. Fluoride concentrations ranged from 0.5 mg/L (eucalyptus) to 52.8 mg/L (hibiscus) in loose-leaf samples, and from 7.5 mg/L (anis) to 47.9 mg/L (hibiscus) in bagged products. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed in six of the nine comparable samples between formats. The non-carcinogenic risk assessment revealed that 3 out of 21 samples, hibiscus (both forms) and boldo (loose-leaf), exceeded the acceptable HQ > 1. Monte Carlo simulation confirmed these findings, with hibiscus infusions showing HQ > 1 in over 90% of the 10,000 iterations. Additionally, the average HI exceeded 1 in six loose-leaf and all bagged samples, with hibiscus reaching a peak HI of 18.06. These findings suggest that the consumption of certain teas and infusions, especially those with high fluoride concentrations, may contribute to excessive fluoride intake and potential health risks. The results support the need for clearer labeling and stricter regulation of fluoride content in tea and infusion products, particularly in countries like Brazil where their consumption is increasing.

巴西从茶叶和草药冲剂(散装叶和袋装)中摄入氟的人类健康风险评估。
本研究旨在评估巴西各种常用茶和草药冲剂中的氟化物浓度,并评估与摄入相关的潜在健康风险。共分析了21个样品,其中12个为活页产品,9个为商业袋装产品。氟定量采用验证分光光度法进行,并进行确定性和概率人类健康风险评估。活叶样品中的氟化物浓度从0.5毫克/升(桉树)到52.8毫克/升(木槿)不等,袋装产品中的氟化物浓度从7.5毫克/升(anis)到47.9毫克/升(木槿)不等。差异有统计学意义(p . 1。蒙特卡罗模拟证实了这些发现,在10,000次迭代中,90%以上的木槿注射显示HQ bbb101。6个活叶和全部袋装样品的平均HI均超过1,其中芙蓉的最高HI为18.06。这些发现表明,饮用某些茶和冲剂,特别是那些氟化物浓度高的茶和冲剂,可能会导致过量的氟化物摄入和潜在的健康风险。研究结果表明,有必要对茶叶和输液产品中的氟化物含量进行更清晰的标识和更严格的监管,特别是在巴西等消费量不断增加的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Trace Element Research
Biological Trace Element Research 生物-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.30%
发文量
459
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Biological Trace Element Research provides a much-needed central forum for the emergent, interdisciplinary field of research on the biological, environmental, and biomedical roles of trace elements. Rather than confine itself to biochemistry, the journal emphasizes the integrative aspects of trace metal research in all appropriate fields, publishing human and animal nutritional studies devoted to the fundamental chemistry and biochemistry at issue as well as to the elucidation of the relevant aspects of preventive medicine, epidemiology, clinical chemistry, agriculture, endocrinology, animal science, pharmacology, microbiology, toxicology, virology, marine biology, sensory physiology, developmental biology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信