Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs Intravenous Analgesics Administered to Donors and Recipients in Renal Transplantation Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Fatma Acil, Andaç Dedeoğlu, Ali İhsan Yürekli, Hülya Tosun Söner, Osman Uzundere, Ramazan Danış, Nurettin Ay, Cem Kıvılcım Kaçar, Erhan Gökçek, Sedat Kaya
{"title":"Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs Intravenous Analgesics Administered to Donors and Recipients in Renal Transplantation Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Fatma Acil, Andaç Dedeoğlu, Ali İhsan Yürekli, Hülya Tosun Söner, Osman Uzundere, Ramazan Danış, Nurettin Ay, Cem Kıvılcım Kaçar, Erhan Gökçek, Sedat Kaya","doi":"10.12659/AOT.949037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Among the limited analgesic options, plane blocks are of great importance in providing effective postoperative analgesia to donors and recipients in renal transplantation surgery. We aimed to demonstrate that anterior type quadratus lumborum plane block provides better analgesia than intravenous paracetamol in open and closed nephrectomy patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study. Renal recipients and donors were divided into 2 groups. One group received anterior quadratus lumborum plane block and the other group received intravenous paracetamol. Pain levels and total tramadol consumption at 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively were recorded as primary data. RESULTS Demographic data of donors and recipients were similar between the QLB and IVA groups, and there was no significant difference in the time spent for surgery, anesthesia, or hospitalization. In renal donors, we found that total tramadol consumption and pain scores of the quadratus lumborum block group were significantly lower than in the intravenous analgesia group (P<0.001). In renal recipients, we found that postoperative tramadol consumption and pain levels of the quadratus lumborum block group were significantly lower than in the intravenous analgesia group (P<0.001). Additionally, the duration of rescue analgesic requirement was significantly shorter in renal recipients and donors who underwent quadratus lumborum plane block compared to the intravenous analgesic group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The anterior type quadratus lumborum plane block provides effective analgesia to recipients and donors in renal transplantation surgery and reduces postoperative opioid consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e949037"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.949037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Among the limited analgesic options, plane blocks are of great importance in providing effective postoperative analgesia to donors and recipients in renal transplantation surgery. We aimed to demonstrate that anterior type quadratus lumborum plane block provides better analgesia than intravenous paracetamol in open and closed nephrectomy patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study. Renal recipients and donors were divided into 2 groups. One group received anterior quadratus lumborum plane block and the other group received intravenous paracetamol. Pain levels and total tramadol consumption at 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively were recorded as primary data. RESULTS Demographic data of donors and recipients were similar between the QLB and IVA groups, and there was no significant difference in the time spent for surgery, anesthesia, or hospitalization. In renal donors, we found that total tramadol consumption and pain scores of the quadratus lumborum block group were significantly lower than in the intravenous analgesia group (P<0.001). In renal recipients, we found that postoperative tramadol consumption and pain levels of the quadratus lumborum block group were significantly lower than in the intravenous analgesia group (P<0.001). Additionally, the duration of rescue analgesic requirement was significantly shorter in renal recipients and donors who underwent quadratus lumborum plane block compared to the intravenous analgesic group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The anterior type quadratus lumborum plane block provides effective analgesia to recipients and donors in renal transplantation surgery and reduces postoperative opioid consumption.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腰前方肌阻滞对肾移植手术供体和受者术后镇痛效果的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景在有限的镇痛选择中,平面阻滞在肾移植手术中为供体和受者提供有效的术后镇痛方面具有重要意义。我们的目的是证明前型腰方肌平面阻滞比静脉注射扑热息痛对开放式和闭合性肾切除术患者有更好的镇痛效果。材料和方法我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。肾受者和供者分为两组。一组给予腰前方肌平面阻滞治疗,另一组给予扑热息痛静脉注射。记录术后1、2、6、12和24小时的疼痛水平和曲马多总消耗量作为主要数据。结果:QLB组和IVA组供体和受者的人口学数据相似,手术时间、麻醉时间和住院时间无显著差异。在肾供者中,我们发现腰方肌阻滞组曲马多总消耗量和疼痛评分明显低于静脉镇痛组(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation. Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication. Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信