Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator In-Basket? Evaluation of Patient Electronic Communication Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Skyler K Palmer, Ananya Shah, Zain Aryanpour, David Le, Julian Winocour, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, David W Mathes, Katie G Egan
{"title":"Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator In-Basket? Evaluation of Patient Electronic Communication Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Skyler K Palmer, Ananya Shah, Zain Aryanpour, David Le, Julian Winocour, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, David W Mathes, Katie G Egan","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient electronic communication (PEC) via secure messaging is important for patient engagement. While PEC has been studied in primary care, data on surgical specialties, particularly plastic surgery, remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assessed the volume and content of post-discharge PECs among patients undergoing post-mastectomy autologous breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective mixed-methods study of PECs from patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction at a large academic institution from January 2021 to December 2023. Primary outcomes included the quantity and thematic content of PECs sent within 30 days post-discharge. Covariates of interest included patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative details. Quantitative analysis included descriptive statistics and multivariable regression to identify predictors of PEC frequency. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify thematic categories of PECs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 297 patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction from January 2021 to December 2023. Of these, 230 patients (77.44%) sent 806 PECs within 30 days post-discharge. The most frequent message topics related to drains, wounds, pain, and activity restrictions. Younger age was a significant negative predictor of total PEC volume (p < .001) and wound-related (p=0.021) or pain-related (p<0.001) PECs, while immediate reconstruction was associated with more wound-related messages (p=0.011). Depression was a positive predictor of pain-related PECs (p=0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first comprehensive study evaluating the quantity and content of post-discharge PECs in a large cohort of patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction. Understanding volume and content of PEC following autologous breast reconstruction may inform strategies for improving perioperative patient education.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient electronic communication (PEC) via secure messaging is important for patient engagement. While PEC has been studied in primary care, data on surgical specialties, particularly plastic surgery, remain limited.

Objectives: This study assessed the volume and content of post-discharge PECs among patients undergoing post-mastectomy autologous breast reconstruction.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective mixed-methods study of PECs from patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction at a large academic institution from January 2021 to December 2023. Primary outcomes included the quantity and thematic content of PECs sent within 30 days post-discharge. Covariates of interest included patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative details. Quantitative analysis included descriptive statistics and multivariable regression to identify predictors of PEC frequency. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify thematic categories of PECs.

Results: A total of 297 patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction from January 2021 to December 2023. Of these, 230 patients (77.44%) sent 806 PECs within 30 days post-discharge. The most frequent message topics related to drains, wounds, pain, and activity restrictions. Younger age was a significant negative predictor of total PEC volume (p < .001) and wound-related (p=0.021) or pain-related (p<0.001) PECs, while immediate reconstruction was associated with more wound-related messages (p=0.011). Depression was a positive predictor of pain-related PECs (p=0.029).

Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive study evaluating the quantity and content of post-discharge PECs in a large cohort of patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction. Understanding volume and content of PEC following autologous breast reconstruction may inform strategies for improving perioperative patient education.

腹壁深下穿支内篮?自体乳房再造术后患者电子通讯的评价。
背景:通过安全消息传递的患者电子通信(PEC)对患者参与非常重要。虽然在初级保健中对PEC进行了研究,但关于外科专科,特别是整形外科的数据仍然有限。目的:本研究评估乳房切除术后自体乳房重建术患者出院后PECs的体积和含量。方法:我们对2021年1月至2023年12月在一家大型学术机构接受自体乳房重建的患者的PECs进行了回顾性混合方法研究。主要结局包括出院后30天内发送PECs的数量和主题内容。感兴趣的协变量包括患者人口统计学、合并症和手术细节。定量分析包括描述性统计和多变量回归来确定PEC频率的预测因子。质性内容分析用于确定pec的主题类别。结果:2021年1月至2023年12月,共有297例患者接受了自体乳房重建术。其中230例(77.44%)患者在出院后30天内发送了806次PECs。最常见的消息主题与排水、伤口、疼痛和活动限制有关。年龄较小是总PEC体积(p < 0.001)、伤口相关(p=0.021)或疼痛相关(p < 0.001)的显著负向预测因子。结论:这是第一个评估大量自体乳房重建术患者出院后PEC数量和含量的综合研究。了解自体乳房再造术后PEC的体积和内容可以为改善围手术期患者教育提供策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信