A 25-Year Review and Psychometric Synthesis of the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) – Form M

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Bradley T. Erford, Xi Zhang, Elizabeth L. Sweeting, Mia Russo, Anna Rashid, Martin F. Sherman, Emily L. Bradford, Xinran Wang, Allison Gao, Xinlei Huang, Ziyi Liu, Allie Haskew, Erin MacInerney, Ellery Moore, Daryn Thompson, Stephanie Barboza, Xinran Huang, Anqi Zhou, Yikai Xu, Yuxin Liu, Shagyuan Xu, Lingxiao Chen, Xianya Yang, Mengxuan Tong, Jieyi Ding, Xinya Yang
{"title":"A 25-Year Review and Psychometric Synthesis of the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) – Form M","authors":"Bradley T. Erford,&nbsp;Xi Zhang,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Sweeting,&nbsp;Mia Russo,&nbsp;Anna Rashid,&nbsp;Martin F. Sherman,&nbsp;Emily L. Bradford,&nbsp;Xinran Wang,&nbsp;Allison Gao,&nbsp;Xinlei Huang,&nbsp;Ziyi Liu,&nbsp;Allie Haskew,&nbsp;Erin MacInerney,&nbsp;Ellery Moore,&nbsp;Daryn Thompson,&nbsp;Stephanie Barboza,&nbsp;Xinran Huang,&nbsp;Anqi Zhou,&nbsp;Yikai Xu,&nbsp;Yuxin Liu,&nbsp;Shagyuan Xu,&nbsp;Lingxiao Chen,&nbsp;Xianya Yang,&nbsp;Mengxuan Tong,&nbsp;Jieyi Ding,&nbsp;Xinya Yang","doi":"10.1002/jcad.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Myers–Briggs Type Indicator – Form M (MBTI-M) is the most popular personality assessment used by professional counselors and taught in counselor education programs. Still, little is known about MBTI-M score reliability and validity beyond what is published in the test manual. This psychometric synthesis aggregated the results across 193 studies from 1999 to 2024 using the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Form M. Internal consistency was 0.845–0.921 across subscales and total scores. Convergent evidence with similar constructs were robust across six personality instruments. Proportions of types and subtypes were aggregated from 178 articles with an aggregated <i>n</i> of 57,170 participants and compared to the normative proportions (<i>n</i> = 3009) published in the manual. Structural validity and test-retest studies were absent from the 25-year literature sampling.</p>","PeriodicalId":48104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling and Development","volume":"103 4","pages":"403-417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcad.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling and Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcad.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Myers–Briggs Type Indicator – Form M (MBTI-M) is the most popular personality assessment used by professional counselors and taught in counselor education programs. Still, little is known about MBTI-M score reliability and validity beyond what is published in the test manual. This psychometric synthesis aggregated the results across 193 studies from 1999 to 2024 using the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Form M. Internal consistency was 0.845–0.921 across subscales and total scores. Convergent evidence with similar constructs were robust across six personality instruments. Proportions of types and subtypes were aggregated from 178 articles with an aggregated n of 57,170 participants and compared to the normative proportions (n = 3009) published in the manual. Structural validity and test-retest studies were absent from the 25-year literature sampling.

Abstract Image

迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标(MBTI)的25年回顾与心理测量综合
迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标-表格M (MBTI-M)是最受专业咨询师使用的人格评估,并在咨询师教育项目中教授。尽管如此,除了测试手册中公布的内容外,人们对MBTI-M分数的信度和效度知之甚少。采用MBTI表格m,对1999年至2024年193项研究的结果进行了心理测量综合。各子量表和总分的内部一致性为0.845-0.921。在六种人格工具中,具有相似结构的趋同证据是强有力的。类型和亚型的比例汇总自178篇文章,共57,170名参与者,并与手册中公布的规范比例(n = 3009)进行比较。在25年的文献抽样中没有结构效度和重测研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Counseling & Development publishes practice, theory, and research articles across 18 different specialty areas and work settings. Sections include research, assessment and diagnosis, theory and practice, and trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信