A Review on Biomarker-Enhanced Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction in Ovarian Cancer Management

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-10 DOI:10.1002/cam4.71224
Somayyeh Hormaty, Anwar Nather Seiwan, Bushra H. Rasheed, Hanieh Parvaz, Ali Gharahzadeh, Hamid Ghaznavi
{"title":"A Review on Biomarker-Enhanced Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction in Ovarian Cancer Management","authors":"Somayyeh Hormaty,&nbsp;Anwar Nather Seiwan,&nbsp;Bushra H. Rasheed,&nbsp;Hanieh Parvaz,&nbsp;Ali Gharahzadeh,&nbsp;Hamid Ghaznavi","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy, largely due to its late-stage diagnosis and nonspecific early symptoms. Advances in biomarker identification and machine learning offer promising avenues for improving early detection and prognosis. This review evaluates the role of biomarker-driven ML models in enhancing the early detection, risk stratification, and treatment planning of OC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed literature spanning clinical, biomarker, and ML studies, emphasizing key diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers (e.g., CA-125, HE4) and ML techniques (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost, Neural Networks). The review synthesizes findings from 17 investigations that integrate multi-modal data, including tumor markers, inflammatory, metabolic, and hematologic parameters, to assess ML model performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Biomarker-driven ML models significantly outperform traditional statistical methods, achieving AUC values exceeding 0.90 in diagnosing OC and distinguishing malignant from benign tumors. Ensemble methods (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost) and deep learning approaches (e.g., RNNs) excel in classification accuracy (up to 99.82%), survival prediction (AUC up to 0.866), and treatment response forecasting. Combining CA-125 and HE4 with additional markers like CRP and NLR enhances specificity and sensitivity. However, limitations such as small sample sizes, lack of external validation, and exclusion of imaging/genomic data hinder clinical adoption.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Biomarker-driven ML represents a transformative approach for OC management, improving diagnostic precision and personalized care. Future research should prioritize multi-center validation, multi-omics integration, and explainable AI to overcome current challenges and enable real-world implementation, potentially reducing OC mortality through earlier detection and optimized treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71224","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy, largely due to its late-stage diagnosis and nonspecific early symptoms. Advances in biomarker identification and machine learning offer promising avenues for improving early detection and prognosis. This review evaluates the role of biomarker-driven ML models in enhancing the early detection, risk stratification, and treatment planning of OC.

Methods

We analyzed literature spanning clinical, biomarker, and ML studies, emphasizing key diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers (e.g., CA-125, HE4) and ML techniques (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost, Neural Networks). The review synthesizes findings from 17 investigations that integrate multi-modal data, including tumor markers, inflammatory, metabolic, and hematologic parameters, to assess ML model performance.

Findings

Biomarker-driven ML models significantly outperform traditional statistical methods, achieving AUC values exceeding 0.90 in diagnosing OC and distinguishing malignant from benign tumors. Ensemble methods (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost) and deep learning approaches (e.g., RNNs) excel in classification accuracy (up to 99.82%), survival prediction (AUC up to 0.866), and treatment response forecasting. Combining CA-125 and HE4 with additional markers like CRP and NLR enhances specificity and sensitivity. However, limitations such as small sample sizes, lack of external validation, and exclusion of imaging/genomic data hinder clinical adoption.

Conclusion

Biomarker-driven ML represents a transformative approach for OC management, improving diagnostic precision and personalized care. Future research should prioritize multi-center validation, multi-omics integration, and explainable AI to overcome current challenges and enable real-world implementation, potentially reducing OC mortality through earlier detection and optimized treatment.

Abstract Image

生物标志物增强机器学习在卵巢癌早期诊断和预后预测中的研究进展
背景卵巢癌(OC)仍然是最致命的妇科恶性肿瘤,主要是由于其晚期诊断和非特异性早期症状。生物标志物识别和机器学习的进步为改善早期检测和预后提供了有希望的途径。这篇综述评估了生物标志物驱动的ML模型在增强OC的早期发现、风险分层和治疗计划方面的作用。方法我们分析了临床、生物标志物和机器学习研究的文献,强调了关键的诊断和预后生物标志物(如CA-125、HE4)和机器学习技术(如随机森林、XGBoost、神经网络)。该综述综合了17项研究的结果,整合了多模式数据,包括肿瘤标志物、炎症、代谢和血液学参数,以评估ML模型的性能。结果生物标志物驱动的ML模型明显优于传统的统计方法,在诊断OC和区分良恶性肿瘤方面的AUC值超过0.90。集成方法(如Random Forest、XGBoost)和深度学习方法(如rnn)在分类精度(高达99.82%)、生存预测(AUC高达0.866)和治疗反应预测方面表现优异。CA-125和HE4与其他标志物如CRP和NLR联合使用可提高特异性和敏感性。然而,样本量小、缺乏外部验证以及排除影像学/基因组数据等局限性阻碍了临床应用。结论生物标志物驱动的ML代表了一种革命性的OC管理方法,提高了诊断精度和个性化护理。未来的研究应优先考虑多中心验证、多组学整合和可解释的人工智能,以克服当前的挑战,并使现实世界的实施成为可能,通过早期检测和优化治疗,潜在地降低OC死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信