Diverging Composition of Natural Temperate Grasslands in Response to Land Use Provides Complementary Conservation Opportunities

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Brad J. Farmilo, Ben J. Zeeman, John W. Morgan, Tara Jalali, Steve J. Sinclair
{"title":"Diverging Composition of Natural Temperate Grasslands in Response to Land Use Provides Complementary Conservation Opportunities","authors":"Brad J. Farmilo,&nbsp;Ben J. Zeeman,&nbsp;John W. Morgan,&nbsp;Tara Jalali,&nbsp;Steve J. Sinclair","doi":"10.1111/emr.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Natural temperate grasslands in south-eastern Australia are threatened ecological communities that have been massively reduced across their range. Relatively intact examples, however, remain on both public land (e.g., roadsides) and private land (e.g., farmland). In western Victoria, natural temperate grasslands have typically been managed by livestock grazing on farmland and by frequent burning on roadsides. Little attention has been given to how grasslands on farmland and roadsides may each contribute to regional or landscape-scale conservation objectives. Our aim was to compare the plant composition of natural temperate grasslands that have been long-managed with fire with those long-managed primarily by sheep grazing, to explore how land-use history influences plant community structure and its potential implications for conservation planning. We sampled 17 sites in frequently burnt grasslands on roadsides, and 10 sites in historically grazed grasslands on farmland. We used non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination techniques to compare plant community composition between grasslands under these different tenures, and to determine how species richness, cover of different species groups and substrate cover were associated with tenure. We also assessed taxonomic beta diversity to quantify species turnover to enable a detailed comparison of species turnover and compositional consistency between roadside and farmland grasslands. There were marked differences in plant community composition between grasslands on roadsides and farmland. Some grazing-tolerant native forbs and C3 grasses were associated with farmland. High native species richness, grazing-sensitive and taller (&gt; 5 cm tall) forbs, native geophytes, and bare ground cover were associated with roadsides. Taxonomic diversity partitioning showed only slight differences in species turnover between farmland and roadside grasslands. Differences in community composition between natural temperate grasslands on roadsides and farmland are consistent with differences in long-term management practices that drive the vegetation in different directions. We argue that long-grazed grasslands on farmland and long-burnt grasslands on roadsides have complementary values for conservation. Both should be targeted for management, which should recognise their differences in size, shape and connectivity. Future funding and incentives for grassland conservation in south-eastern Australia will require careful balance to ensure investments consider the complementary roles of different types of grassland sites at the landscape scale.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.70022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural temperate grasslands in south-eastern Australia are threatened ecological communities that have been massively reduced across their range. Relatively intact examples, however, remain on both public land (e.g., roadsides) and private land (e.g., farmland). In western Victoria, natural temperate grasslands have typically been managed by livestock grazing on farmland and by frequent burning on roadsides. Little attention has been given to how grasslands on farmland and roadsides may each contribute to regional or landscape-scale conservation objectives. Our aim was to compare the plant composition of natural temperate grasslands that have been long-managed with fire with those long-managed primarily by sheep grazing, to explore how land-use history influences plant community structure and its potential implications for conservation planning. We sampled 17 sites in frequently burnt grasslands on roadsides, and 10 sites in historically grazed grasslands on farmland. We used non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination techniques to compare plant community composition between grasslands under these different tenures, and to determine how species richness, cover of different species groups and substrate cover were associated with tenure. We also assessed taxonomic beta diversity to quantify species turnover to enable a detailed comparison of species turnover and compositional consistency between roadside and farmland grasslands. There were marked differences in plant community composition between grasslands on roadsides and farmland. Some grazing-tolerant native forbs and C3 grasses were associated with farmland. High native species richness, grazing-sensitive and taller (> 5 cm tall) forbs, native geophytes, and bare ground cover were associated with roadsides. Taxonomic diversity partitioning showed only slight differences in species turnover between farmland and roadside grasslands. Differences in community composition between natural temperate grasslands on roadsides and farmland are consistent with differences in long-term management practices that drive the vegetation in different directions. We argue that long-grazed grasslands on farmland and long-burnt grasslands on roadsides have complementary values for conservation. Both should be targeted for management, which should recognise their differences in size, shape and connectivity. Future funding and incentives for grassland conservation in south-eastern Australia will require careful balance to ensure investments consider the complementary roles of different types of grassland sites at the landscape scale.

自然温带草原的不同组成对土地利用的响应提供了互补的保护机会
澳大利亚东南部的自然温带草原是受到威胁的生态群落,它们的分布范围已经大规模减少。然而,相对完整的例子仍然存在于公共土地(如路边)和私人土地(如农田)上。在维多利亚州西部,自然温带草原通常是由牲畜在农田上放牧和经常在路边焚烧来管理的。很少有人注意到农田和路边的草地如何对区域或景观尺度的保护目标做出贡献。我们的目的是比较长期以火为主要管理方式的自然温带草原与长期以放牧为主要管理方式的自然温带草原的植物组成,探讨土地利用历史如何影响植物群落结构及其对保护规划的潜在影响。我们对17个地点进行了采样,这些地点位于路边经常被烧毁的草地上,10个地点位于农田上的历史放牧草地上。利用非度量的多维尺度排序技术,比较了不同权属下草原的植物群落组成,分析了物种丰富度、不同类群覆盖度和底物覆盖度与权属的关系。我们还评估了分类β多样性来量化物种更替,以便详细比较路边草地和农田草地的物种更替和组成一致性。路边草地与农田草地的植物群落组成差异显著。一些耐放牧的乡土牧草和C3草与农田共生。高本地物种丰富度、放牧敏感性和较高(5 cm高)的草本植物、原生地植物和裸地植被与路边相关。分类多样性划分表明,农田与路边草地的物种更替差异不大。路边自然温带草地与农田草地群落组成的差异与导致植被向不同方向移动的长期管理措施的差异是一致的。我们认为,长期放牧的农田草地和长期燃烧的路边草地具有互补的保护价值。两者都应该成为管理的目标,管理应该认识到它们在大小、形状和连通性方面的差异。未来对澳大利亚东南部草原保护的资金和激励措施需要谨慎平衡,以确保投资考虑到不同类型草地在景观规模上的互补作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信