Zain Mohammed, Mohammed Sarwar Shah, Imtanaan Abbas, Nabeel Hussain, Shehzar Shah, Saira Chowdry, Shyam Balasubramanian, Kate Owen
{"title":"Pharmacist Peer-Led Teaching Enhances Medical Undergraduate Prescribing: A Mixed-Methods Study","authors":"Zain Mohammed, Mohammed Sarwar Shah, Imtanaan Abbas, Nabeel Hussain, Shehzar Shah, Saira Chowdry, Shyam Balasubramanian, Kate Owen","doi":"10.1111/tct.70192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Prescribing is a high-stakes clinical task where newly qualified doctors frequently report low confidence, with national data highlighting persistent error rates. Medical schools face logistical and staffing barriers in delivering high-quality, simulation-based prescribing education. Peer-led, interprofessional teaching, particularly by pharmacists, may offer a scalable solution in this context.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>This is the first study to evaluate pharmacist peer-led prescribing education using a mixed-methods framework. We designed and implemented a pharmacist peer-led prescribing programme for final-year medical students at Warwick Medical School. Peer tutors were final-year medical students with pharmacy backgrounds. Participants were recruited from the final year cohort (<i>n</i> = 74) and were split randomly across two groups, receiving teaching in a crossover format at different intervals. Teaching focused on calculations, high-risk drugs and prescribing in clinical scenarios. Mixed-methods evaluation included simulated assessments, confidence questionnaires, national PSA performance and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using non-parametric tests, and qualitative data were thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke's framework.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-four students participated. Simulated prescribing assessment scores significantly improved within both groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with large effect sizes and strong domain-level gains (e.g., calculations +38.1%, data interpretation +37.2%). PSA scores and pass rates were higher among participants. Confidence improved across all domains (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Thematic analysis revealed four key enablers: specialist peer insights, interactive delivery, psychological safety and curriculum alignment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This novel pharmacist-led, peer-teaching model improved prescribing skills, confidence and interprofessional awareness. Now adopted locally and nationally, it offers a transferable, low-cost framework for embedding peer-led simulation into prescribing education.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70192","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Prescribing is a high-stakes clinical task where newly qualified doctors frequently report low confidence, with national data highlighting persistent error rates. Medical schools face logistical and staffing barriers in delivering high-quality, simulation-based prescribing education. Peer-led, interprofessional teaching, particularly by pharmacists, may offer a scalable solution in this context.
Approach
This is the first study to evaluate pharmacist peer-led prescribing education using a mixed-methods framework. We designed and implemented a pharmacist peer-led prescribing programme for final-year medical students at Warwick Medical School. Peer tutors were final-year medical students with pharmacy backgrounds. Participants were recruited from the final year cohort (n = 74) and were split randomly across two groups, receiving teaching in a crossover format at different intervals. Teaching focused on calculations, high-risk drugs and prescribing in clinical scenarios. Mixed-methods evaluation included simulated assessments, confidence questionnaires, national PSA performance and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using non-parametric tests, and qualitative data were thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke's framework.
Evaluation
Seventy-four students participated. Simulated prescribing assessment scores significantly improved within both groups (p < 0.001), with large effect sizes and strong domain-level gains (e.g., calculations +38.1%, data interpretation +37.2%). PSA scores and pass rates were higher among participants. Confidence improved across all domains (p < 0.001). Thematic analysis revealed four key enablers: specialist peer insights, interactive delivery, psychological safety and curriculum alignment.
Implications
This novel pharmacist-led, peer-teaching model improved prescribing skills, confidence and interprofessional awareness. Now adopted locally and nationally, it offers a transferable, low-cost framework for embedding peer-led simulation into prescribing education.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.