Toward a Learning Cycle Data-Governance Toolkit for Rule-Makers and Policy Leaders in Smart Cities

IF 1.8 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Daniela Piana
{"title":"Toward a Learning Cycle Data-Governance Toolkit for Rule-Makers and Policy Leaders in Smart Cities","authors":"Daniela Piana","doi":"10.1002/pa.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This commentary article presents a learning-centric approach to smart cities [FUTURA] with a triadic quality assurance method, inclusive design and use, risk management, and rights protection. The model displays high suitability for contexts of intensive digital transformation, leading to a rise in fairness, social inclusion, and intergenerational sustainability in cities experiencing comprehensive processes of innovation that are data-driven and AI-supported. The article outlines for decision-makers involved in the city governance processes a four-step-based policy design and implementation method at the crossroads of AI, data-driven information, and institutionally embedded knowledge. The proposal takes stock of a longstanding research program delving into the functional and structural rationales of the human oversight (art.14) approach adopted in the context of AI-governance interpenetration. Beyond the empirical evidence gathered through a scientific strategy that has disentangled the mechanisms of digital transformation at the individual, organizational, and systemic levels of four policy sectors, this work heads straightforwardly to make a case in favor of the adoption of a toolkit and the associated methodology in the context of the European AI Act implementation. The empirical field considered is smart cities. This choice merges two rationales, one scientific—the level of analysis of a smart city enables researchers to have a heuristically adequate and in-depth understanding of the three micro-meso-macro interdependences—and one institutional—cities represent nowadays spectacular and highly sensitive targets of innovation, investments, and citizens/leaders' responsiveness and mutual engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Affairs","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pa.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.70069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This commentary article presents a learning-centric approach to smart cities [FUTURA] with a triadic quality assurance method, inclusive design and use, risk management, and rights protection. The model displays high suitability for contexts of intensive digital transformation, leading to a rise in fairness, social inclusion, and intergenerational sustainability in cities experiencing comprehensive processes of innovation that are data-driven and AI-supported. The article outlines for decision-makers involved in the city governance processes a four-step-based policy design and implementation method at the crossroads of AI, data-driven information, and institutionally embedded knowledge. The proposal takes stock of a longstanding research program delving into the functional and structural rationales of the human oversight (art.14) approach adopted in the context of AI-governance interpenetration. Beyond the empirical evidence gathered through a scientific strategy that has disentangled the mechanisms of digital transformation at the individual, organizational, and systemic levels of four policy sectors, this work heads straightforwardly to make a case in favor of the adoption of a toolkit and the associated methodology in the context of the European AI Act implementation. The empirical field considered is smart cities. This choice merges two rationales, one scientific—the level of analysis of a smart city enables researchers to have a heuristically adequate and in-depth understanding of the three micro-meso-macro interdependences—and one institutional—cities represent nowadays spectacular and highly sensitive targets of innovation, investments, and citizens/leaders' responsiveness and mutual engagement.

Abstract Image

面向智慧城市规则制定者和政策领导者的学习周期数据治理工具包
这篇评论文章提出了一种以学习为中心的智慧城市方法[FUTURA],采用三合一的质量保证方法、包容性设计和使用、风险管理和权利保护。该模型非常适合密集的数字化转型背景,从而在经历数据驱动和人工智能支持的全面创新过程的城市中提高公平性、社会包容性和代际可持续性。本文为参与城市治理过程的决策者概述了在人工智能、数据驱动信息和制度嵌入知识的十字路口,基于四步的政策设计和实施方法。该提案评估了一项长期研究计划,该计划深入研究了人工智能治理相互渗透背景下采用的人类监督(第14条)方法的功能和结构原理。除了通过科学战略收集的经验证据(该战略在四个政策部门的个人、组织和系统层面上理清了数字化转型的机制)之外,这项工作直接提出了一个支持在欧洲人工智能法案实施背景下采用工具包和相关方法的案例。考虑的实证领域是智慧城市。这一选择融合了两个基本原理,一个是科学的——智慧城市的分析水平使研究人员能够启发式地充分和深入地理解这三个微观-中观-宏观的相互依存关系,另一个是制度的——城市代表了当今创新、投资、公民/领导人的反应和相互参与的壮观和高度敏感的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Affairs
Journal of Public Affairs PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Affairs provides an international forum for refereed papers, case studies and reviews on the latest developments, practice and thinking in government relations, public affairs, and political marketing. The Journal is guided by the twin objectives of publishing submissions of the utmost relevance to the day-to-day practice of communication specialists, and promoting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信