A. M. Lunichkin, I. G. Andreeva, L. G. Zaitseva, E. A. Ogorodnikova
{"title":"Individual Differences in Auditory Feedback Control of Speech in Noise","authors":"A. M. Lunichkin, I. G. Andreeva, L. G. Zaitseva, E. A. Ogorodnikova","doi":"10.1134/S1063771024602577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study tested the hypothesis that speech changes in noise (the Lombard effect) may have significant individual differences, including those due to the gender and age of the speakers. For this, the characteristics of Lombard speech were studied for 12 speakers (6 men, 6 women; age groups: 25–35 and 55–59 age). The study used recordings of speech consisting of disyllabic words with stressed vowel sounds [<i>a</i>], [<i>i</i>], [<i>u</i>] of Russian speech in silence and in multitalker noise at levels of 60 and 72 dB(A). Changes in the fundamental frequency (Δ<i>F</i>0) and intensity (Δ<i>I</i>) of the voice in noise compared to silence were determined. When comparing groups of men and women, significant differences in the change of <i>F</i>0 in noise of 60 dB are shown. Differences in vowel characteristics between the young and middle-aged speaker groups were found for Δ<i>F</i>0 and Δ<i>I</i> in 72 dB noise. Regardless of gender and age, two types of speakers were identified, differing in the Δ<i>F</i>0 and Δ<i>I</i> values at both noise levels. Type 1 speakers in multitalker noise increased <i>F</i>0 by 23 and 57 Hz, for levels of 60 and 72 dB, respectively, and type 2 speakers, by 16 and 23 Hz. At two levels of noise masking, the voice intensity of type 1 speakers increased by 8 and 16 dB; the voice intensity of type 2 speakers, by 6 and 10 dB. The obtained differences may be determined by the greater influence of voluntary control, with an increase in the noise level in type 2 speakers we have identified.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":455,"journal":{"name":"Acoustical Physics","volume":"71 3","pages":"467 - 478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1063771024602577","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study tested the hypothesis that speech changes in noise (the Lombard effect) may have significant individual differences, including those due to the gender and age of the speakers. For this, the characteristics of Lombard speech were studied for 12 speakers (6 men, 6 women; age groups: 25–35 and 55–59 age). The study used recordings of speech consisting of disyllabic words with stressed vowel sounds [a], [i], [u] of Russian speech in silence and in multitalker noise at levels of 60 and 72 dB(A). Changes in the fundamental frequency (ΔF0) and intensity (ΔI) of the voice in noise compared to silence were determined. When comparing groups of men and women, significant differences in the change of F0 in noise of 60 dB are shown. Differences in vowel characteristics between the young and middle-aged speaker groups were found for ΔF0 and ΔI in 72 dB noise. Regardless of gender and age, two types of speakers were identified, differing in the ΔF0 and ΔI values at both noise levels. Type 1 speakers in multitalker noise increased F0 by 23 and 57 Hz, for levels of 60 and 72 dB, respectively, and type 2 speakers, by 16 and 23 Hz. At two levels of noise masking, the voice intensity of type 1 speakers increased by 8 and 16 dB; the voice intensity of type 2 speakers, by 6 and 10 dB. The obtained differences may be determined by the greater influence of voluntary control, with an increase in the noise level in type 2 speakers we have identified.
期刊介绍:
Acoustical Physics is an international peer reviewed journal published with the participation of the Russian Academy of Sciences. It covers theoretical and experimental aspects of basic and applied acoustics: classical problems of linear acoustics and wave theory; nonlinear acoustics; physical acoustics; ocean acoustics and hydroacoustics; atmospheric and aeroacoustics; acoustics of structurally inhomogeneous solids; geological acoustics; acoustical ecology, noise and vibration; chamber acoustics, musical acoustics; acoustic signals processing, computer simulations; acoustics of living systems, biomedical acoustics; physical principles of engineering acoustics. The journal publishes critical reviews, original articles, short communications, and letters to the editor. It covers theoretical and experimental aspects of basic and applied acoustics. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.