Seismic response and failure mode of a shallow overburden slope reinforced with an ecological frame beam structure

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Jiayong Niu , Shuai Zhang , Lixin Zhang , Jianjing Zhang , Xueliang Jiang
{"title":"Seismic response and failure mode of a shallow overburden slope reinforced with an ecological frame beam structure","authors":"Jiayong Niu ,&nbsp;Shuai Zhang ,&nbsp;Lixin Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianjing Zhang ,&nbsp;Xueliang Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The technique of integrating vegetation and geotechnical measure is an effective and ecological method for preventing and controlling shallow landslide. A new type of ecological frame beam, a bamboo frame structure incorporating the dynamic shear resistance of plant roots (<em>Amorpha fruticosa</em>), was designed to reinforce shallow overburden slope. To investigate the seismic response and failure mode of the slope reinforced by this support structure, a large-scale shaking table test was conducted taking into consideration different seismic wave types and excitation amplitudes. The results show that the distribution and amplitude of low-frequency seismic components (&lt;18 Hz) significantly influence slope displacement responses. The sudden change of natural frequency and damping ratio can also reflect the damage degree and deformation stage of the slope. Seismic damage of the slope mainly occurs at the slope shoulder and the slope crest, as well as at the left and right boundaries of the upper part of the shallow overburden. The failure mode is the continuous collapse and sliding of the shallow overburden along the stable surface, which is characterized by the crushing spreading of overburden soil mass. The ecological frame beam structure exhibits effective seismic resistance at peak seismic excitation ≤0.6 g. It is recommended to consider 2.1–3.6 times the elevation amplification effect in the seismic design of ecological frame beam structure. The root system contributes to seismic performance by reducing near-surface dynamic responses and enhancing energy dissipation capacity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 107795"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742500285X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The technique of integrating vegetation and geotechnical measure is an effective and ecological method for preventing and controlling shallow landslide. A new type of ecological frame beam, a bamboo frame structure incorporating the dynamic shear resistance of plant roots (Amorpha fruticosa), was designed to reinforce shallow overburden slope. To investigate the seismic response and failure mode of the slope reinforced by this support structure, a large-scale shaking table test was conducted taking into consideration different seismic wave types and excitation amplitudes. The results show that the distribution and amplitude of low-frequency seismic components (<18 Hz) significantly influence slope displacement responses. The sudden change of natural frequency and damping ratio can also reflect the damage degree and deformation stage of the slope. Seismic damage of the slope mainly occurs at the slope shoulder and the slope crest, as well as at the left and right boundaries of the upper part of the shallow overburden. The failure mode is the continuous collapse and sliding of the shallow overburden along the stable surface, which is characterized by the crushing spreading of overburden soil mass. The ecological frame beam structure exhibits effective seismic resistance at peak seismic excitation ≤0.6 g. It is recommended to consider 2.1–3.6 times the elevation amplification effect in the seismic design of ecological frame beam structure. The root system contributes to seismic performance by reducing near-surface dynamic responses and enhancing energy dissipation capacity.
生态框架梁结构加筋浅覆盖层边坡地震响应及破坏模式
植被与土工措施相结合技术是防治浅层滑坡的一种有效的生态方法。设计了一种新型生态框架梁,即结合植物根系动态抗剪能力的竹框架结构,用于加固浅层覆盖层边坡。为研究该支护结构加固边坡的地震响应和破坏模式,进行了考虑不同地震波类型和激励幅值的大型振动台试验。结果表明,低频地震分量(<18 Hz)的分布和幅值对边坡位移响应有显著影响。固有频率和阻尼比的突变也能反映边坡的损伤程度和变形阶段。边坡地震破坏主要发生在坡肩、坡顶以及浅覆盖层上部的左右边界。破坏模式为浅层覆盖层沿稳定面连续垮塌滑动,其特征为覆盖层土体的破碎扩展。生态框架梁结构在峰值地震激励≤0.6 g时表现出有效的抗震性能。建议在生态框架梁结构抗震设计中考虑2.1 ~ 3.6倍的高程放大效应。根系通过降低近地表动力响应和增强耗能能力来提高抗震性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信