Centerline-based quantification of true Lumen helical Morphology in Type B aortic dissection: Unlocking the potential of helicity as a geometric biomarker

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Fikunwa O. Kolawole , Johan Bondesson , Brant W. Ullery , Christopher P. Cheng
{"title":"Centerline-based quantification of true Lumen helical Morphology in Type B aortic dissection: Unlocking the potential of helicity as a geometric biomarker","authors":"Fikunwa O. Kolawole ,&nbsp;Johan Bondesson ,&nbsp;Brant W. Ullery ,&nbsp;Christopher P. Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The helical morphology of Type B aortic dissections (TBAD) represents a potentially important geometric biomarker that may influence dissection progression. While three-dimensional surface-based quantification methods provide accurate TBAD helicity assessment, their clinical adoption remains limited by significant processing time. We developed and validated a clinically practical centerline-based helicity quantification method using routine imaging software (TeraRecon) against an extensively validated surface-based method (SimVascular). In 87 TBAD patients, we semi-automatically extracted aortic, true lumen, and branch vessel centerlines from CT imaging. Helical parameters, including true lumen helical angle and peak helical twist, were computed relative to a standardized anatomical reference, enabling classification of patients into four distinct helicity categories: left-chiral, right-chiral, non-helical, and mixed-chiral patterns. The centerline method demonstrated 92% classification accuracy with excellent agreement with surface-based measurements (Cohen’s <span><math><mrow><mi>κ</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>88</mn></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></mrow></math></span>). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests revealed a median difference of <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><msup><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> (<span><math><mrow><mi>z</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>08</mn></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>28</mn></mrow></math></span>), indicating no statistically significant systematic bias between methods. This centerline approach we have developed provides clinically feasible TBAD helicity classification while maintaining excellent agreement with the gold-standard surface-based method. This technique can integrate seamlessly with existing clinical workflows, enabling practical assessment of TBAD helical morphology for enhanced risk stratification and personalized treatment planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112933"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The helical morphology of Type B aortic dissections (TBAD) represents a potentially important geometric biomarker that may influence dissection progression. While three-dimensional surface-based quantification methods provide accurate TBAD helicity assessment, their clinical adoption remains limited by significant processing time. We developed and validated a clinically practical centerline-based helicity quantification method using routine imaging software (TeraRecon) against an extensively validated surface-based method (SimVascular). In 87 TBAD patients, we semi-automatically extracted aortic, true lumen, and branch vessel centerlines from CT imaging. Helical parameters, including true lumen helical angle and peak helical twist, were computed relative to a standardized anatomical reference, enabling classification of patients into four distinct helicity categories: left-chiral, right-chiral, non-helical, and mixed-chiral patterns. The centerline method demonstrated 92% classification accuracy with excellent agreement with surface-based measurements (Cohen’s κ=0.88, p<0.001). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests revealed a median difference of 0.4 (z=1.08, p=0.28), indicating no statistically significant systematic bias between methods. This centerline approach we have developed provides clinically feasible TBAD helicity classification while maintaining excellent agreement with the gold-standard surface-based method. This technique can integrate seamlessly with existing clinical workflows, enabling practical assessment of TBAD helical morphology for enhanced risk stratification and personalized treatment planning.
B型主动脉夹层真实腔腔螺旋形态的中心线量化:释放螺旋度作为几何生物标志物的潜力
B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)的螺旋形态是一种可能影响夹层进展的重要几何生物标志物。虽然基于三维表面的量化方法提供了准确的TBAD螺旋度评估,但其临床应用仍然受到大量处理时间的限制。我们开发并验证了一种临床实用的基于中心线的螺旋度定量方法,该方法使用常规成像软件(TeraRecon)和广泛验证的基于表面的方法(SimVascular)。在87例TBAD患者中,我们从CT图像中半自动提取主动脉、真腔和分支血管中心线。螺旋参数,包括真正的管腔螺旋角和峰值螺旋扭,计算相对于标准化的解剖参考,使患者分为四种不同的螺旋类型:左手性,右手性,非螺旋和混合手性模式。中心线方法显示出92%的分类准确率,与基于表面的测量结果非常吻合(Cohen’s κ=0.88, p<0.001)。Wilcoxon符号秩检验显示中位数差异为−0.4°(z=−1.08,p=0.28),表明两种方法之间没有统计学上显著的系统偏差。我们开发的这种中心线方法提供了临床可行的TBAD螺旋度分类,同时与金标准的基于表面的方法保持了良好的一致性。该技术可以与现有的临床工作流程无缝集成,实现TBAD螺旋形态的实际评估,以增强风险分层和个性化治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信