Modelling residential relocation behaviour combining passive revealed preference data and stated preference survey data

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yu Wang , Thomas O. Hancock , Yacan Wang , Charisma Choudhury
{"title":"Modelling residential relocation behaviour combining passive revealed preference data and stated preference survey data","authors":"Yu Wang ,&nbsp;Thomas O. Hancock ,&nbsp;Yacan Wang ,&nbsp;Charisma Choudhury","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding how various factors shape residential relocation is crucial for effective infrastructure planning and policy. Yet, existing revealed preference (RP) datasets often lack essential demographic or dwelling details, while stated preference (SP) surveys are prone to hypothetical bias and behavioural incongruence. To fill in this gap, this study presents a residential relocation choice model that combines residential location data derived from passively generated public transport smart cards of 82,720,872 users and SP data from 971 respondents (8739 observations) in Beijing, China. Both types of data were generated or collected in the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to higher-than-usual residential relocations in Beijing. The integrated approach, which accounts for the scale difference between the two datasets, reveals a strong preference for city-centre locations. But higher infection risks increase the likelihood of moving away from crowded areas, whereas flexible work-from-home policies lower the inclination to relocate to the centre. These findings quantify how different pandemic-related factors alter traditional relocation drivers. The results can guide policymakers in designing more resilient housing and transport policies, especially under future disruptions like pandemics. Moreover, the data-fusion framework offers a replicable strategy for researchers and planners seeking to capture both real-world behaviours and hypothetical scenarios in residential location studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 103789"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how various factors shape residential relocation is crucial for effective infrastructure planning and policy. Yet, existing revealed preference (RP) datasets often lack essential demographic or dwelling details, while stated preference (SP) surveys are prone to hypothetical bias and behavioural incongruence. To fill in this gap, this study presents a residential relocation choice model that combines residential location data derived from passively generated public transport smart cards of 82,720,872 users and SP data from 971 respondents (8739 observations) in Beijing, China. Both types of data were generated or collected in the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to higher-than-usual residential relocations in Beijing. The integrated approach, which accounts for the scale difference between the two datasets, reveals a strong preference for city-centre locations. But higher infection risks increase the likelihood of moving away from crowded areas, whereas flexible work-from-home policies lower the inclination to relocate to the centre. These findings quantify how different pandemic-related factors alter traditional relocation drivers. The results can guide policymakers in designing more resilient housing and transport policies, especially under future disruptions like pandemics. Moreover, the data-fusion framework offers a replicable strategy for researchers and planners seeking to capture both real-world behaviours and hypothetical scenarios in residential location studies.
结合被动显示偏好数据和陈述偏好调查数据对住宅搬迁行为进行建模
了解各种因素如何影响居民搬迁对有效的基础设施规划和政策至关重要。然而,现有的显示偏好(RP)数据集往往缺乏必要的人口统计或居住细节,而陈述偏好(SP)调查容易产生假设偏差和行为不一致。为了填补这一空白,本研究提出了一个住宅搬迁选择模型,该模型结合了北京82,720,872名被动生成的公共交通智能卡用户的住宅位置数据和来自971名受访者(8739个观察点)的SP数据。这两种类型的数据都是在COVID-19大流行的背景下生成或收集的,这导致北京的居民搬迁率高于平时。综合方法解释了两个数据集之间的规模差异,揭示了对城市中心位置的强烈偏好。但是,较高的感染风险增加了离开拥挤地区的可能性,而灵活的在家工作政策降低了迁移到中心的倾向。这些发现量化了不同的大流行相关因素如何改变传统的迁移驱动因素。研究结果可以指导决策者设计更具弹性的住房和交通政策,尤其是在未来出现流行病等破坏的情况下。此外,数据融合框架为研究人员和规划人员提供了一种可复制的策略,可以在住宅选址研究中捕捉现实世界的行为和假设的场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信