Qingsong Xing , Yanlin Yan , Fumin Deng , Peng Wang
{"title":"Regulatory game model of carbon leakage collusion: Prospect theory and verification agency dynamics","authors":"Qingsong Xing , Yanlin Yan , Fumin Deng , Peng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The compliance of carbon data quality is a key factor that concerns national image, market stability, and policy-making, and has always been one of the hot issues widely concerned by all sectors of society. As an important tool for promoting corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) behaviors, the Emission Trading System (ETS) plays a significant role in achieving carbon emission reduction targets. This study introduces prospect theory to construct a regulatory game model of carbon leakage collusion behavior involving both passive and active participation of verification institutions, and discusses the collusion conditions of various participants under different model parameters. Through numerical simulation, the study explores the impact of key factors such as collusion benefits on the shift in the collusion behavior of verification institutions and on the collusion situation of multiple behavior subjects under different model parameters. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) The choice of collusion method by the actors of carbon verification institutions is influenced by their subjective perception of the probability of successful government supervision and the benefits of collusion; 2) The behavior subjects are more sensitive to changes in the degree of loss aversion coefficient than to changes in the degree of marginal sensitivity coefficient.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 108874"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The compliance of carbon data quality is a key factor that concerns national image, market stability, and policy-making, and has always been one of the hot issues widely concerned by all sectors of society. As an important tool for promoting corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) behaviors, the Emission Trading System (ETS) plays a significant role in achieving carbon emission reduction targets. This study introduces prospect theory to construct a regulatory game model of carbon leakage collusion behavior involving both passive and active participation of verification institutions, and discusses the collusion conditions of various participants under different model parameters. Through numerical simulation, the study explores the impact of key factors such as collusion benefits on the shift in the collusion behavior of verification institutions and on the collusion situation of multiple behavior subjects under different model parameters. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) The choice of collusion method by the actors of carbon verification institutions is influenced by their subjective perception of the probability of successful government supervision and the benefits of collusion; 2) The behavior subjects are more sensitive to changes in the degree of loss aversion coefficient than to changes in the degree of marginal sensitivity coefficient.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.