Traumatic cardiac arrest in older adults in the United States

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Aditya C. Shekhar , Zachary Kuschner , Michael Altman-Ezzard , Jennifer Carter , Bojana Milekic , Michael Redlener , Ethan E. Abbott , Benjamin S. Abella , Yuji Yamada
{"title":"Traumatic cardiac arrest in older adults in the United States","authors":"Aditya C. Shekhar ,&nbsp;Zachary Kuschner ,&nbsp;Michael Altman-Ezzard ,&nbsp;Jennifer Carter ,&nbsp;Bojana Milekic ,&nbsp;Michael Redlener ,&nbsp;Ethan E. Abbott ,&nbsp;Benjamin S. Abella ,&nbsp;Yuji Yamada","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Traumatic cardiac arrest is associated with lower survival rates compared with other arrest etiologies. Relatively little research has examined potential variation in traumatic cardiac arrest parameters as a function of patient age. We hypothesize that traumatic cardiac arrest in the older adult population may be appreciably different with regards to demographics and clinical features from traumatic cardiac arrest in other age groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We examined a nationally-representative database of emergency medical services (EMS) activations in the United States (NEMSIS). We included all adult (≥18 years) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests responded to by ground ambulance EMS crews in 2022 and 2023 documented as having a traumatic etiology. Arrests were grouped based on whether they involved adult patients (18–60 years) or older adult patients (61+ years) based on pre-existing classifications within the dataset. Key arrest data were compared across the two groups using two-tailed two-proportion z-tests; significance was defined as <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across 10,573 older adult (61+ years) traumatic cardiac arrests and 34,203 adult (18–60 years) traumatic cardiac arrests, traumatic cardiac arrests in older adults were less likely to be witnessed (35.9 % vs. 39.5 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.00001), less likely to receive pre-EMS cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (29.7 % vs. 33.1 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.00001), more likely to be initially-shockable (3.7 % vs. 2.4 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.00001), and more likely to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (11.3 % vs. 7.5 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.00001). Traumatic cardiac arrests in older adults were also less likely to be associated with mass casualty incidents (MCIs) (0.7 % vs. 0.9 %; <em>p</em> = 0.02642) or the use of alcohol/drugs (3.5 % vs. 6.4 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.00001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our analysis of a large and nationally-representative database of EMS activations in the United States reveals traumatic cardiac arrest in older adults is associated with several key differences. Further study is needed to identify potential mechanisms underpinning these differences and develop approaches to mitigate the risk of traumatic cardiac arrest across all ages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101076"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425002139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Traumatic cardiac arrest is associated with lower survival rates compared with other arrest etiologies. Relatively little research has examined potential variation in traumatic cardiac arrest parameters as a function of patient age. We hypothesize that traumatic cardiac arrest in the older adult population may be appreciably different with regards to demographics and clinical features from traumatic cardiac arrest in other age groups.

Methods

We examined a nationally-representative database of emergency medical services (EMS) activations in the United States (NEMSIS). We included all adult (≥18 years) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests responded to by ground ambulance EMS crews in 2022 and 2023 documented as having a traumatic etiology. Arrests were grouped based on whether they involved adult patients (18–60 years) or older adult patients (61+ years) based on pre-existing classifications within the dataset. Key arrest data were compared across the two groups using two-tailed two-proportion z-tests; significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results

Across 10,573 older adult (61+ years) traumatic cardiac arrests and 34,203 adult (18–60 years) traumatic cardiac arrests, traumatic cardiac arrests in older adults were less likely to be witnessed (35.9 % vs. 39.5 %; p < 0.00001), less likely to receive pre-EMS cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (29.7 % vs. 33.1 %; p < 0.00001), more likely to be initially-shockable (3.7 % vs. 2.4 %; p < 0.00001), and more likely to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (11.3 % vs. 7.5 %; p < 0.00001). Traumatic cardiac arrests in older adults were also less likely to be associated with mass casualty incidents (MCIs) (0.7 % vs. 0.9 %; p = 0.02642) or the use of alcohol/drugs (3.5 % vs. 6.4 %; p < 0.00001).

Conclusion

Our analysis of a large and nationally-representative database of EMS activations in the United States reveals traumatic cardiac arrest in older adults is associated with several key differences. Further study is needed to identify potential mechanisms underpinning these differences and develop approaches to mitigate the risk of traumatic cardiac arrest across all ages.
美国老年人的创伤性心脏骤停
与其他心脏骤停病因相比,外伤性心脏骤停与较低的生存率相关。相对较少的研究检查了创伤性心脏骤停参数作为患者年龄函数的潜在变化。我们假设老年人群的创伤性心脏骤停与其他年龄组的创伤性心脏骤停在人口统计学和临床特征方面可能有明显不同。方法:我们检查了美国紧急医疗服务(EMS)激活的全国代表性数据库(NEMSIS)。我们纳入了所有在2022年和2023年由地面救护车EMS人员响应的具有创伤病因的成人(≥18岁)院外心脏骤停。根据数据集中已有的分类,根据是否涉及成年患者(18-60岁)或老年成人患者(61岁以上)对逮捕进行分组。使用双尾双比例z检验比较两组的关键骤停数据;显著性定义为p <; 0.05。结果在10,573名老年人(61岁以上)外伤性心脏骤停和34,203名成年人(18-60岁)外伤性心脏骤停中,老年人外伤性心脏骤停的可能性较低(35.9%对39.5%;p < 0.00001),接受急救前心肺复苏(CPR)的可能性较低(29.7%对33.1%;p < 0.00001),更容易出现最初休克(3.7%对2.4%;p < 0.00001),更有可能实现自然循环恢复(ROSC)(11.3%对7.5%;p < 0.00001)。老年人的创伤性心脏骤停也不太可能与大规模伤亡事件(MCIs)(0.7%对0.9%;p = 0.02642)或酒精/药物使用(3.5%对6.4%;p < 0.00001)相关。结论:我们对美国具有全国代表性的大型EMS激活数据库的分析显示,老年人的创伤性心脏骤停与几个关键差异有关。需要进一步的研究来确定这些差异背后的潜在机制,并制定降低所有年龄段创伤性心脏骤停风险的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信