{"title":"Differentiating wild and domesticated bananas using volcaniform phytolith morphology and dimensions: Evidence from Sri Lanka","authors":"R. Premathilake , C.O. Hunt , P.P.D.C. Perera","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Identifying domesticated banana phytoliths from archaeological sites within the natural geographical range of the wild progenitors of domesticated bananas is very challenging. This is because of the considerable similarity between phytoliths of domesticated triploid and tetraploid banana plants and those of the diploid species <em>Musa acuminata</em> and <em>M. balbisiana</em> in the <em>Eumusa</em> section, from which the domesticated varieties ultimately derive. This paper presents evidence for separating phytoliths derived from diploid, triploid and tetraploid banana plants in the Sri Lankan context. 8649 volcaniform (cavate) phytoliths from domesticated (triploid/tetraploid) banana plants and 2592 volcaniform phytoliths from diploid cultiwild and wild banana plants underwent morphotypic analysis into Ball et al.’s eight classes and were measured for basal length and crater width. Although there is overlap, modern domesticated triploid/tetraploid and diploid banana plants in Sri Lanka can be discriminated on morphotypic variation and size-ranges of volcaniform phytoliths. In our sampling, triploid and tetraploid banana plants have higher percentages of V3 morphotypes and generally higher percentages of V4 and V6 morphotypes of volcaniform phytoliths relative to <em>M. acuminata</em> and <em>M. balbisiana</em>, while V2 and V7 morphotypes are restricted to triploid and tetraploid banana plants and are not present in <em>M. acuminata</em> and <em>M. balbisiana</em>. Further, V4 and V8 are found in <em>M. balbisiana</em>, but not in <em>M. acuminata</em>. In Sri Lanka, mean basal length and crater width of volcaniform phytoliths in triploid and tetraploid bananas are greater than in <em>M. acuminata</em> and <em>M. balbisiana</em>. The overlap of size-ranges between phytoliths of triploid/tetraploid and diploid banana taxa is problematical, but threshold values of basal length > 29.1 µm and crater width > 12.1 µm can be used to distinguish some of the larger volcaniform phytoliths from triploid and tetraploid banana plants from those from and <em>M. balbisiana</em>, which do not exceed these dimensions in Sri Lanka, while <em>M. acuminata</em> volcaniforms do not exceed basal length of 27.2 µm and crater width of 10.2 µm. The size distributions of <em>M. balbisiana</em> volcaniforms suggest that two populations of this species are present in Sri Lanka, conceivably with different histories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 105377"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25004109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Identifying domesticated banana phytoliths from archaeological sites within the natural geographical range of the wild progenitors of domesticated bananas is very challenging. This is because of the considerable similarity between phytoliths of domesticated triploid and tetraploid banana plants and those of the diploid species Musa acuminata and M. balbisiana in the Eumusa section, from which the domesticated varieties ultimately derive. This paper presents evidence for separating phytoliths derived from diploid, triploid and tetraploid banana plants in the Sri Lankan context. 8649 volcaniform (cavate) phytoliths from domesticated (triploid/tetraploid) banana plants and 2592 volcaniform phytoliths from diploid cultiwild and wild banana plants underwent morphotypic analysis into Ball et al.’s eight classes and were measured for basal length and crater width. Although there is overlap, modern domesticated triploid/tetraploid and diploid banana plants in Sri Lanka can be discriminated on morphotypic variation and size-ranges of volcaniform phytoliths. In our sampling, triploid and tetraploid banana plants have higher percentages of V3 morphotypes and generally higher percentages of V4 and V6 morphotypes of volcaniform phytoliths relative to M. acuminata and M. balbisiana, while V2 and V7 morphotypes are restricted to triploid and tetraploid banana plants and are not present in M. acuminata and M. balbisiana. Further, V4 and V8 are found in M. balbisiana, but not in M. acuminata. In Sri Lanka, mean basal length and crater width of volcaniform phytoliths in triploid and tetraploid bananas are greater than in M. acuminata and M. balbisiana. The overlap of size-ranges between phytoliths of triploid/tetraploid and diploid banana taxa is problematical, but threshold values of basal length > 29.1 µm and crater width > 12.1 µm can be used to distinguish some of the larger volcaniform phytoliths from triploid and tetraploid banana plants from those from and M. balbisiana, which do not exceed these dimensions in Sri Lanka, while M. acuminata volcaniforms do not exceed basal length of 27.2 µm and crater width of 10.2 µm. The size distributions of M. balbisiana volcaniforms suggest that two populations of this species are present in Sri Lanka, conceivably with different histories.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.