Facile and optimal decision support model for development photovoltaic solar power toward sustainability: Four case studies for selection location, manufacturer, technology, and strategy

IF 9.5 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Ibrahim Alrashdi , Ahmed M. Ali , Karam M. Sallam , Mohamed Abdel-Basset
{"title":"Facile and optimal decision support model for development photovoltaic solar power toward sustainability: Four case studies for selection location, manufacturer, technology, and strategy","authors":"Ibrahim Alrashdi ,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Ali ,&nbsp;Karam M. Sallam ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdel-Basset","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fossil fuels pose various risks to human health and the environment. Fossil fuels release carbon emissions, impact climate change, air pollutions harm human health, and water pollution harm communities. Solar is the best choice to convert from fossil fuel to clean, sustainable, inexpensive energy sources and solve all previous issues. Photovoltaic (PV) energy is the primary part of solar energy. PV is used to generate electricity. This paper proposes an intelligent decision support model for the sustainable development of solar PV power by introducing four stages. The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) procedure is used in this paper to deal with conflict criteria. Two MCDM methods are used such as Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) to obtain factor weights and Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) to order alternatives. A spherical fuzzy set (SFS) framework is used with MCDM methods to deal with vague information. There are four stages in this paper applied to four applications in the solar PV field. In the first stage, the site selection application is employed using the SF-SWARA-EDAS procedure to select the best location. Then, in the second stage, after obtaining the best location, the manufacturer selection application is solved by choosing the best manufacturer. In the third stage, the technology selection application is solved after obtaining the best location and manufacturer. Finally, the strategy selection application is solved to select the best strategy to overcome issues in the development of solar power PV. In each stage, sensitivity and comparative analysis are employed. The main results show the location 10, manufacture 10, technology 1, and strategy 1 are the best alternatives. The sensitivity analysis shows the rank of alternatives in each stage is stable. The comparative study compared the SF-SWARA-EDAS procedure with other MCDM methods. The outcomes of the comparative analysis show the SF-SWARA-EDAS procedure is effective compared with other MCDM approaches. This study can aid governance in providing sustainability and renewable energy with multiple benefits such as clean energy production, reduced carbon emissions, minimized dependence on fossil fuels, and reduced costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100520"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125001603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fossil fuels pose various risks to human health and the environment. Fossil fuels release carbon emissions, impact climate change, air pollutions harm human health, and water pollution harm communities. Solar is the best choice to convert from fossil fuel to clean, sustainable, inexpensive energy sources and solve all previous issues. Photovoltaic (PV) energy is the primary part of solar energy. PV is used to generate electricity. This paper proposes an intelligent decision support model for the sustainable development of solar PV power by introducing four stages. The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) procedure is used in this paper to deal with conflict criteria. Two MCDM methods are used such as Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) to obtain factor weights and Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) to order alternatives. A spherical fuzzy set (SFS) framework is used with MCDM methods to deal with vague information. There are four stages in this paper applied to four applications in the solar PV field. In the first stage, the site selection application is employed using the SF-SWARA-EDAS procedure to select the best location. Then, in the second stage, after obtaining the best location, the manufacturer selection application is solved by choosing the best manufacturer. In the third stage, the technology selection application is solved after obtaining the best location and manufacturer. Finally, the strategy selection application is solved to select the best strategy to overcome issues in the development of solar power PV. In each stage, sensitivity and comparative analysis are employed. The main results show the location 10, manufacture 10, technology 1, and strategy 1 are the best alternatives. The sensitivity analysis shows the rank of alternatives in each stage is stable. The comparative study compared the SF-SWARA-EDAS procedure with other MCDM methods. The outcomes of the comparative analysis show the SF-SWARA-EDAS procedure is effective compared with other MCDM approaches. This study can aid governance in providing sustainability and renewable energy with multiple benefits such as clean energy production, reduced carbon emissions, minimized dependence on fossil fuels, and reduced costs.
面向可持续发展的光伏太阳能发展的简单和最优决策支持模型:选择地点、制造商、技术和战略的四个案例研究
化石燃料对人类健康和环境构成各种风险。化石燃料释放碳排放,影响气候变化,空气污染危害人类健康,水污染危害社区。太阳能是将化石燃料转化为清洁、可持续、廉价的能源并解决以往所有问题的最佳选择。光伏(PV)能源是太阳能的主要组成部分。光伏是用来发电的。本文通过引入四个阶段,提出了太阳能光伏发电可持续发展的智能决策支持模型。本文采用多准则决策(MCDM)方法来处理冲突准则。采用逐步权重评估比分析法(SWARA)和基于平均解到有序方案的距离评价法(EDAS)两种MCDM方法获得因子权重。将球面模糊集框架与MCDM方法相结合,对模糊信息进行处理。本文针对太阳能光伏领域的四种应用分为四个阶段。在第一阶段,使用SF-SWARA-EDAS程序使用选址应用程序来选择最佳位置。然后,在第二阶段,在获得最佳位置后,通过选择最佳制造商来解决制造商选择问题。第三阶段,在确定最佳选址和生产厂家后,解决技术选择应用问题。最后,解决了策略选择应用,以选择最佳策略来克服太阳能光伏发电发展中存在的问题。在每个阶段都采用了敏感性分析和比较分析。主要结果表明,区位10、制造10、技术1和战略1是最优选择。灵敏度分析表明,各阶段备选方案的排序是稳定的。比较研究将SF-SWARA-EDAS程序与其他MCDM方法进行了比较。对比分析结果表明,SF-SWARA-EDAS程序与其他MCDM方法相比是有效的。这项研究可以帮助治理提供可持续性和可再生能源的多重效益,如清洁能源生产、减少碳排放、最大限度地减少对化石燃料的依赖和降低成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信